Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘A Necessary Supplement’ — What the United Nations Global Compact Is (and Is Not)

  • Chapter
Corporate Social and Human Rights Responsibilities

Abstract

Since its operational launch in 2000, the United Nations Global Compact has attracted a good deal of both support and criticism. The Compact represents the world’s largest network-based voluntary corporate citizenship initiative.1 The term ‘corporate citizenship’ is adopted here from the literature as a descriptor for a voluntary change of business practices to meet the responsibilities imposed on firms by their stakeholders.2 It is, however, outside the scope of this chapter to undertake a careful delineation of its similarities and differences with ‘corporate responsibility’. Although progress has been made in terms of the large number of business and non-business participants (now numbering 7,300) and improvements in business practices have been presented (McKinsey3 concludes that nine out of ten participants are doing more towards the Compact’s principles than they were 5 years ago), this progress also brought about a lot of criticism, largely from nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academics and the wider press. Thérien and Pouliot,4 for instance, argue that the Compact fosters a ‘pro-market spin’ that breaks with the UN’s traditional position and thus is eroding its legitimacy in the long run. Amnesty International5 complains about the missing accountability of the initiative and asks for a more rigorous assessment of whether participants are really complying with the principles. In a more radical way, Sethi argues that the Compact ‘provides a venue for opportunistic companies to make grandiose statements of corporate citizenship without worrying about being called to account for their actions’.6

The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Business and Society, 48/4, December/2009 by SAGE Publications, Inc., All rights reserved. © SAGE Publications, Inc. The article can be accessed at: http://bas.sagepub.com.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hemphill, Thomas A. (2005). The United Nations global compact. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Norman, Wayne & Néron, Pierre-Yves (2008). Citizenship Inc.: do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKinsey & Company (2007). Shaping the New Rules of Competition: UN Global Compact Participant Mirror. London: McKinsey.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thérien, Jean-Philippe & Pouliot, Vincent (2006). The global compact: shifting the politics of international development. Global Governance, 12, 55–75, here: p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deva, Surya (2006). Global compact: a critique of the UN’s “public-private” partnership for promoting corporate citizenship. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Communication, 34, 107–151; Nolan, Justine (2005). The United Nations global compact with business: hindering or helping the protection of human rights? The University of Queensland Law Journal, 24, 445–466;Rizvi, Haider (2004). UN pact with business lacks accountability, available at: http://2qwww.globalpolicy.org; Zammit, Ann (2003). Development at Risk: Rethinking UN-Business Partnerships. New York: The South Centre and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations (1 February 1999) Secretary-General Address to the World Economic Forum in Davos [Press Release SG/SM/6881]. New York: United Nations, here: p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ruggie. John G. (2001). Global_governance.net: the global compact as learning network. Global Governance, 7, 371–378, here: p. 371;Ruggie, John G. (2002). Trade, sustainability and global governance. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 27, 297–307, here: 301.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, Oliver F. (2004). The UN global compact: the challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 755–774, here: 760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palazzo, Guido & Scherer, Andreas G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88; Windsor, Duane (2007). Toward a global theory of cross-border and multilevel corporate political activity. Business and Society, 46(2), 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kell, Georg & Ruggie, John G. (1999). Global markets and social legitimacy: the case for the ‘global compact’. Transnational Corporations, 8, 101–120, here: 103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, Jonathan (2001). The world’s business: the United Nations and the globalization of corporate citizenship. In J. Andriof & M. Macintosh (Eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship. Sheffield: Greenleaf, pp. 185–197, here: p. 185.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kell, Georg (2005). The global compact: selected experiences and reflections. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 69–79, here: 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenau, James N. (1992). Governance, order and change in world politics. In James N. Rosenau & Ernst Otto Czempiel (Eds.), Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dingwert, Klaus & Pattberg, Phillip (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12, 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll, Archie B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Birch, David (2001). Corporate citizenship: rethinking business beyond corporate social responsibility. In Joerg Andriof & Malcolm McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship (pp. 53–65). Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Poncelet, Eric (2003). Resisting corporate citizenship: business-NGO relations in multistakeholder environmental partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kell, Georg & Levin, David (2003). The global compact network: an historic experiment in learning and action. Business and Society Review, 108, 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Global Compact (2003a). HIV/AIDS: Everybody’s Business. New York: Global Compact Office; Global Compact (2003b). Experiences in Management for Sustainability. New York: Global Compact Office; Global Compact (2003c). From Principles to Practice. New York: Global Compact Office; Global Compact (2004). Embedding Human Rights in Business practice. New York: Global Compact Office; Global Compact (2006). Business Against Corruption: Case Stories and Examples. New York: Global Compact Office.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Transnational Resource and Action Center (TRAC) (2000). Tangled up in Blue: Corporate Partnerships at the United Nations. San Francisco: TRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Palazzo, Guido & Scherer, Andreas G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McIntosh, Malcom, Thomas, Ruth, Leipziger, Deborah, & Coleman, Gill (2003). Living Corporate Citizenship: Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business. London et al.: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fort, Timothy L. & Schipani, Cindy A. (2002). The role of the corporation in fostering sustainable peace. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 35, 389–435.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cavanagh, Gerald F. (2004). Global business ethics — regulation, code, or self-restraint. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scherer, Andreas G., Palazzo, Guido, & Baumann, Dorothee (2006). Global rules and private actors: toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bigge, David M. (2004). Bring on the bluewash — a social constructivist argument against using nike v. Kasky to attack the UN Global Compact. International Legal Perspectives, 14, 6–21, here: 10; Kell (2005), supra note 16, here: 71.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levy, David L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963; Levy, David L. & Prakash, Aseem (2003). Bargains old and new: multinational corporations in global governance. Business and Politics, 5(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy, Sean D. (2005). Taking multinational corporate codes of conduct to the next level. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43, 388–433, here: 389.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Global Compact (2007). UN Global Compact Annual Review. New York: Global Compact Office.

    Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2005). Implementing the Global Compact: A Booklet for Inspiration. Copenhagen: UNDP, here: p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kell, Georg (2003). The Global Compact: origins, operations, progress, challenges. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11, 35–49, here: 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2007). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental, and Social Performance v3. Boston, MA: GRI.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gilbert, Dirk U. & Rasche, Andreas (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: the ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baldwin, Robert, Scott, Colin, & Hood, Christopher (1998). A Reader on Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Selznick, Philip (1985). Focusing organizational research on regulation. In Ed R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences (pp. 363–367). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, here: p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Webb, Kernaghan (2004). Understanding the voluntary code phenomenon. In Kernaghan Webb (Ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (pp. 3–32). Ottawa, CA: Carleton University Press, here: p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. United Nations (24 June 2004). Global compact participants on ‘Common Historic Journey’ to fairer, more stable world says Secretary-General at UN Summit [Press Release SG/SM/9383, ECO/69]. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bardach, Eugene & Kagan, Robert A. (1982). Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Coglianese, Cary, & Nash, Jennifer. (2001). Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals. Washington: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  40. International Chamber of Commerce (24 June 2004). The Global Compact: A Business Perspective [Press release]. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  41. United Nations (3 December 2001). Towards global partnerships [General Assembly Resolution A/56/L.33]. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hemphill (2005), supra note 2, here: 312;Williams (2004), supra note 11, here: 758.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ziegler, Oliver (2007). Global Compact membership in Europe and the US: a case study of the automobile industry. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 26, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Blagescu, Monica & Lloyd, Robert (2006). 2006 Global Accountability Report: Holding Power to Account. London: One World Trust;Rasche, Andreas & Esser, Daniel E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability: applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Centindamar, Dilek & Husoy, Kristoffer (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior: the case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 163–176; McKinsey & Company (2004). Assessing the Global Compact’s Impact. New York: Global Compact Office.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Aupperle, Kenneth E., Carroll, Archie B., & Hatfield, John (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Waddock, Sandra & Graves, Samuel B. (1997). The corporate social performance: financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Orlitzky, Marc, Schmidt, Frank L., & Rynes, Sara (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Goldman Sachs (2007). Introducing GS Sustain. London: The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Christian Science Monitor (2000). A New Global Compact. Retrieved 20 July 2007, available at: http://www.csmonitor.com/2000/0908/p10s1.html.

  51. Deva (2006), Nolan (2005), supra note 8;Thérien & Pouliot (2006), supra note 5; Williams (2004), supra note 11.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gilbert, Dirk U. & Rasche, Andreas (2008). Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives: a stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 755–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rasche, Andreas (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards: the case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 192–205; United Nations (2004), supra note 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Andreas Rasche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    Karin Buhmann (Associate Professor) (Associate Professor)

  2. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

    Lynn Roseberry (Associate Professor) & Mette Morsing (Professor of Corporate Social Responsibility) (Associate Professor) &  (Professor of Corporate Social Responsibility)

Copyright information

© 2011 Andreas Rasche

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rasche, A. (2011). ‘A Necessary Supplement’ — What the United Nations Global Compact Is (and Is Not). In: Buhmann, K., Roseberry, L., Morsing, M. (eds) Corporate Social and Human Rights Responsibilities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294615_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation