Skip to main content

Europe’s Revolution in Defence Industrial Affairs

  • Chapter
Managing the Revolution in Military Affairs
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

The potential for the timely implementation of an RMA in the early years of the twenty-first century rests on a wide variety of considerations. These include the readiness of governments to spend significantly on defence and the capacity of armed forces to reshape their doctrine, training and organization to take full advantage of available technologies. As discussed by Bill Kincaid in Chapter 11 of this volume, tight equipment acquisition practices, involving precise and coherent requirements’ capture and the use of a variety of contracting arrangements, will also be needed. But much will also depend on the performance of the defence businesses that will be contracted to develop and produce the equipment involved. Defence industry is predominantly in private hands in the US, the UK and Germany. In states where state ownership of defence production has been the central tradition, most prominently France, Italy and Spain, there is a strong trend towards privatization. Defence industry, in short, is largely beyond the direct control of government, although government’s influence as a customer, regulator and sponsor of defence businesses is huge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. There is a large literature on defence equipment collaboration, including Alan G. Draper, European Defence Equipment Collaboration: Britain’s Involvement 1957–87 (Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Creasey and S. May, The European Armaments Market and Procurement Co-operation Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1988

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Trevor Taylor, Defence, Technology and International Integration (London: Pinter, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keith Hartley, NATO Arms Collaboration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Relevant press reports include ‘MoD Faces Plea over Eurofighter Missile Deal’, Daily Telegraph, 5 January 2000; ‘UK Under Pressure to Buy European Missile’, The Times, 4 January 2000; ‘Blair Faces Call for Action over Eurofighter Missiles’, Tinancial Times 3 January 2000; ‘Blair Caught in Missile Crossfire’, Independent on Sunday, 28 November 1999; ‘Raytheon Offers RAF Half-Price Missile Deal’, The Independent, 16 September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A telling critique of European arms cooperation practices was the Vredeling Report commissioned by the Independent European Programme Group, formally known as the Independent Study Team Report, Towards a Stronger Europe (Brussels: IEPG, December 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Trevor Taylor, ‘Defence Industries in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol.16, no. 1, January 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. At the end of 1999 the Greek government was looking to sell 49 per cent and management control of Hellenic Aerospace Industry to a foreign defence company. See ‘Greek Aerospace Plant Draws Bids’, Financial Times, 8 December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ‘Rheinmetall Boosts Euro Dominance’, Jane’s Defence Weekly, 17 November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ‘BAe’s Marconi Purchase Now Viewed as Damaging’, International Herald Tribune, 26 February 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a prominent GEC executive writing about the weakness of British political support for defence firms compared with the backing provided by the French government for French firms, see Alan Kemp, ‘Paying the Price for Under Investment’, Defence Procurement Analysis, winter 98/99, pp. 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Edward Kolodziej, Making and Marketing Arms: the French Experience and Its Implications for the International System, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ‘DASA Spanish Deal Trumps BAe’, Daily Telegraph, 14 June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a summary of EADS structure including its shareholders, see ‘EADS Structures Itself for Different Futures’, Jane’s Defence Weekly, 15 December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ‘European Restructuring Takes Off’, Flight International, 6–12 January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ‘Thomson Ready to Take Fight to New BAe’, Jane’s Defence Weekly, 24 November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ‘Finmeccanica takes Missile Group Stake’, Financial Times, 21 October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ‘BAe and EADS Battle for Alenia’, Flight International, 22 December 1999–3 January 2000; ‘BAe, EADS Fight for Finmeccanica’, Financial Times, 17 January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 1998–1999 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998) pp. 273ff, 284ff. See also Gordon Adams, then of the IISS, ‘The Atlantic Option’, Financial Times, 28 January 1999; and ‘Platform Envy’, The Economist, 12 December 1998, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ‘Lockheed Chief Warns of a Fortress Europe’, Financial Times, 30 October 1998; ‘Raytheon Seeks More Link Ups’, Financial Times, 31 March 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ‘Thomson-CSF fait mouche à l’exportation’, Figaro, 4–5 December 1999; Thomson-CSF to buy into Avimo’, Financial Times, 21 September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. This issue is discussed in ‘JSF Negotiations Pivot on Technology Access’, Defense News, 20 December 1999. See also ‘£6 billion Work for UK if Boeing Wins Dogfight’, The Guardian, 28 January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See ‘DoD Struggles with “Globalisation”’, Jane’s Defence Weekly, 4 August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See ‘KPMG Withdraws Merger Study’, Financial Times, 29 November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Cartwright and G. L. Cooper, Managing Mergers, Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances: Integrating People and Cultures, 2nd edn (London: Butterworth/ Heinemann, 1996) pp. 7 and 43, provide much evidence in this area, and observe that ‘most organisations muddle through the merger process, moving from one organisational crisis to another’ (p. 7) and ‘merger and acquiring management are invariably over-confident in their estimation of the speed and ease with which they can achieve integration’ (p. 43)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Ries and J. Trout, Marketing Warfare (London: McGraw-Hill, 1986) pp. 23 and 33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Bullet Point, Issue 66, November/December 1999, for a quick useful guide to the concept and practice of intrapreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  28. ‘An Ambitious Strategist Playing for High Stakes’, Financial Times, 3 January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Ghoshal and C. A. Bartlett, Managing Across Borders: the Transnational Solution (London: Random House, 1998) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See in particular ibid, chapters 5 and 13.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. and S. J. Tolchin, Selling our Security: the Erosion of America’s Assets, New York: Knopf, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, T. (2001). Europe’s Revolution in Defence Industrial Affairs. In: Matthews, R., Treddenick, J. (eds) Managing the Revolution in Military Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294189_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics