Skip to main content

Consociation and Self-Determination Disputes: The Evidence from Northern Ireland and Other Recent Cases

  • Chapter
Book cover After the Nation?

Part of the book series: International Political Theory Series ((IPoT))

Abstract

This chapter examines the relevance of Arend Lijphart’s theory of consociation to self-determination disputes. A self-determination dispute is an empirically testable phenomenon that revolves around discrete national identities and rival nationalist movements. The division over nationality is the key political division. The region’s dominant political parties, and its popular civic associations, are nationalist in character and support the classical political goals of self-determination: autonomy, with or without links to national kin in other states, or independence, or irredentism. A self-determination dispute does not suggest that everyone in the region is a nationalist, or embraces nationalism with the same intensity. It does not imply that national identities are fixed, although it suggests they are durable and unlikely to fuse, assimilate, or dissolve into one common identity within the foreseeable future. Contrary to what is suggested by the title of this volume, self-determination disputes are ubiquitous, occurring within and throughout each continent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakvis, H. (1987) ‘Alternative Models of Governance: Federalism, Consociationalism, and Corporatism’ in H. Bakvis and W. M. Chandler (eds) Federalism and the Role of the State (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1975a) ‘The Consociational Model and Its Dangers’, European Journal of Political Research, 3, 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1975b) ‘Review Article: Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, 5, 477–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, B., Dickson, E., and Kymlicka, W. (2004) Ethnicity and Democracy in Africa (London: James Currey Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, P. (1991) Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison (New Delhi: SAGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (1996) Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, W. (1986) ‘The Impact of Homelands upon Diasporas’ in G. Sheffer (ed.) Modern Diasporas in International Politics (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawisha, A. I. and Dawisha, K. (2003) ‘How to build a Democratic Iraq’, Foreign Affairs, 82 (3), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esman, M. (2005) An Introduction to Ethnic Conflict (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1993) Minorities at Risk (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, H. (2005) ‘The Makeup and Breakup of Ethnofederal States: Why Russia Survives Where the USSR Fell’, Perspectives on Politics, 3 (1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, H. (2004) ‘Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse’, World Politics, 56 (2), 165–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D. (2001) ‘The Agreement: Clear, Consociational and Risky’ in J. McGarry (ed.) Northern Ireland in a Divided World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D. (1991) A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson-Preece, J. (2007) ‘Human and Minority Rights’ in M. Weller and B. Metzger (eds) Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (2004) ‘Constitutional Design for Divided Societies’, Journal of Democracy, 15 (2), 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1995) ‘Self-Determination vs. Pre-Determination of Ethnic Minorities in Power-Sharing Systems’ in W. Kymlicka (ed.) The Rights of Minority Cultures (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1979) ‘Consociation and Federation: Conceptual and Political Links’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12 (3), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1975) ‘Review Article. The Northern Ireland Problem: Cases, Theories, and Solutions’, British Journal of Political Science, 5 (1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1969) ‘Consociational Democracy’, World Politics, 21 (2), 207–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1968) The Politics of Accommodation (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makiya, K. (2003) ‘A Model for Post-Saddam Iraq’, Journal of Democracy, 14 (3), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J. (2007) ‘Iraq and Liberal Consociation’ in B. Roswell, D. Malone and M. Bouillon (eds) Iraq: Preventing Another Generation of Conflict (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J. (2005) ‘Canadian Lessons for Iraq’ in B. O’Leary, J. McGarry, and K. Salih (eds) The Future of Kurdistan in Iraq (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J., Keating, M., and Moore, M. (2006) ‘Introduction: European Integration and the Nationalities Question’ in J. McGarry and M. Keating (eds) European Integration and the Nationalities Question (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (2004) The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, B. (2007) ‘Iraq’s Natural Resources’ in B. Roswell, D. Malone, and M. Bouillon (eds) Iraq: Preventing Another Generation of Conflict (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, B. (2005) ‘Power-Sharing, Pluralist Federation, and Federacy’ in B. O’Leary, J. McGarry, and K. Salih (eds) The Future of Kurdistan in Iraq (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, F. (2007) ‘External Relations and Trans-Border Cooperation’ in M. Weller and B. Metzger (eds) Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber, L. and Little, A. (1996) Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. (2000) From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict (New York: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2003) ‘Democracy and Ethno-Religious Conflict in Iraq’, Survival, 45 (4), 111–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 John McGarry and Brendan O’Leary

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGarry, J., O’Leary, B. (2010). Consociation and Self-Determination Disputes: The Evidence from Northern Ireland and Other Recent Cases. In: Breen, K., O’Neill, S. (eds) After the Nation?. International Political Theory Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293175_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics