Abstract
Although according to moral particularism, principles need not be in themselves metaphysically or rationally dubious, the order of priority between principle and particular runs from the latter to the former. Thus, whatever moral principles exist, they ‘are learnt in and from particular cases’ (Dancy, 1985a, p.151), and it is also suggested that an agent who is in possession of a ‘large list of principles … [could be] at an advantage when coming to a decision in a particular case’ (Dancy, 1985a, p.150). Notwithstanding the admission that principles can be learnt, and it can be a good thing to learn them from the point of view of moral reasoning, the role of principles is nevertheless highly restricted. Recall from Chapter 1 §1.4 that ‘a moral principle amounts to a reminder of the sort of importance that a property can have in suitable circumstances’ (Dancy, 1985a, p.150).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Benedict Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, B. (2011). Particularism and Subjectivity. In: Particularism and the Space of Moral Reasons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292437_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292437_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36269-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29243-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)