Abstract
In recent years, a number of theorists — I will focus on Daniel Levy and Natan Sznaider (2006), but see also Jeffrey C. Alexander (2002) and Helmut Dubiel (2003)1 — have argued for what I will call the ‘universalization scenario’ about the memory of the Holocaust. This scenario has two aspects. The first is that the Holocaust has come to function not merely as a name for a specific historical crime, but as a universal signifier for the systematic violation of human rights in general. It has been ‘transformed into a generalized symbol of human suffering and moral evil’ (Alexander 2002, p. 6), denoting ‘moral evil itself’ (Dubiel 2003, p. 59). At the same time, and this is the second aspect of the scenario, the memory of the Holocaust has ceased to be the particular possession of the members of those states and groups which were directly involved in the Holocaust, but has become universalized in the sense that it has become the common property of everyone (or at least of everyone in what the authors call ‘Second Modernity’). As Levy and Sznaider occasionally recognize, there are two concepts of universality at work here. The first is the conceptual and normative universality of a concept that applies to a potentially infinite number of instances; the second is geographical, or perhaps political: it refers to the spread of a cultural symbol across state boundaries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2002. ‘On the social construction of moral universals: the ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama.’ European Journal of Social Theory 5(1), pp. 5–85.
Arendt, Hannah. 1994a. ‘Organized guilt and collective responsibility.’ First published in 1945. Republished in Arendt, Essays in Understanding 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 121–32.
Arendt, Hannah. 1994b [1963]. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books.
Assmann, Jan. 2006 [2000]. Religion and Cultural Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Burg, Avraham. 2008. The Holocaust is Over; We Must Rise From its Ashes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dubiel, Helmut. 2003. ‘The remembrance of the holocaust as a catalyst for a transnational ethic.’ New German Critique 90 (Autumn), pp. 59–70.
Hoerl, Christoph. 1999. ‘Memory, amnesia and the past.’ Mind and Language 14(2), pp. 227–51.
Klein, Kerwin Lee. 2000. ‘On the emergence of memory in historical discourse.’ Representations 69 (Winter), pp. 127–50.
Kundera, Milan. 1999 [1984]. The Unbearable Lightness of Being. New York: HarperPerennial.
Levy, Daniel and Natan Sznaider. 2006 [2001]. The Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Nora, Pierre. 1989. ‘Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire.’ Representations 26, pp. 1–21.
Poole, Ross. 2008. ‘History, memory, and the claims of the past.’ Memory Studies 1(2), pp. 149–66.
Ricoeur, Paul. 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
Young, James E. 1993. The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
Zertal, Idith. 2005. Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Ross Poole
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poole, R. (2010). Misremembering the Holocaust: Universal Symbol, Nationalist Icon or Moral Kitsch?. In: Gutman, Y., Brown, A.D., Sodaro, A. (eds) Memory and the Future. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292338_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292338_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31989-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29233-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)