Skip to main content

Introduction: Memory and the Future: Why a Change of Focus is Necessary

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies ((PMMS))

Abstract

For those who study memory, there is a nagging concern that memory studies is inherently backward-looking, and that memory itself — and the ways in which it is deployed, invoked and utilized — can potentially hinder efforts to move forward. It is the purpose of this book to challenge these assumptions by looking at how the study and practice of memory are ultimately about and for the present and future. This Janus-faced view of memory as looking to the past in order to shape the present and future is the basis for the increasingly relevant and pressing concerns and scholarship about the relationship of individual and collective memory to democratic politics; human rights and transitional justice; revenge, imposture and forgery; social movements and utopian moments; and historical facts and scientific technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2004. ‘Toward a theory of cultural trauma,’ in Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ron Eyerman, Bernhard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser and Piotr Sztompka (eds), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 6–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932. Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluck, Susan and Nicole Alea. 2002. ‘Exploring the functions of autobiographical memory: why do I remember the autumn?,’ in J.D. Webster and B.K. Haight (eds), Critical Advances in Reminiscence Work: From Theory to Application. New York: Springer Publishing, pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Adam D., James Root, Tracy Romano, Luke Chang and William Hirst. Under Review. ‘The limits of memory and imagination: Overgeneralized autobiographical memory and episodic simulation in posttraumatic stress disorder.’

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza, Roberto and Peggy St Jacques. 2007. ‘Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(5), pp. 219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cieply, Michael. 2009. ‘Turning swords to pens, and warriors to writers.’ New York Times, 12 October. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/movies/13veterans.html?_r=2&ref=arts (accessed 29 January 2010).

  • Conway, Martin A. 2005. ‘Memory and the self.’ Journal of Memory and Language 53(4), pp. 594–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Martin and Kit Pleydell-Pearce. 2000. ‘The construction of autobiographical memories in the self memory system.’ Psychological Review 107(2), pp. 261–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, Jeffery C. 2009. ‘Resistance and creativity in social interaction: for and against memory in Poland, Israel-Palestine, and the United States.’ International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 22(2), pp. 143–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, Yifat. 2009. ‘Where do we go from here: the pasts, presents and futures of Ground Zero.’ Memory Studies 2(1), pp. 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992 [1925]. On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Marianne and Leo Spitzer. 2010. Ghosts of Home: The Afterlife of Czernowitz in Jewish Memory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 2003. ‘Kodak moments, flashbulb memories: reflections on 9/11.’ The Drama Review 47(1), pp. 11–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontopodis, Michalis. 2009. ‘Documents’ memories: enacting pasts and futures at the school for individual learning-in-practice.’ Memory Studies 2(1), pp. 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, Alison. 2004. Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, Ulric. 1978. ‘What are the important questions?,’ in M.M. Gruneberg, E.E. Morris and R.N. Sykes (eds), Practical Aspects of Memory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, David. 1992. ‘Remembering personal circumstances: a functional analysis,’ in E. Winograd and U. Neisser (eds), Affect and Accuracy in Recall: Studies of ‘Flashbulb’ Memories. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Albie. 2009. ‘From prison to constitutional court: the changing face of justice in South Africa.’ Paper presented at Irmgard Coninx Stiftung Roundtables on Transnationality, Memory Politics, 22 October 2009, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, Daniel. 1996. Searching for Memory: the Brain, the Mind, and the Past. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, Daniel, Donna Rose Addis and Richard L. Buckner. 2008. ‘Episodic simulation of future events: concepts, data, and applications.’ The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124, pp. 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 1992. Watergate in American Memory. How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Barry. 1996. ‘The expanding past.’ Qualitative Sociology 19(3), pp. 275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Barry. 2000. Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward. 1981. Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. 2004. ‘September 11, 2001 as cultural trauma,’ in Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ron Eyerman, Bernhard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser and Piotr Sztompka (eds), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 342–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, Jennifer. 2006. ‘Remembering the past’s future: anti-imperialist nostalgia and some versions of the third world.’ Cultural Critique 62, pp. 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, Eugene and Ulric Neisser. 1988. Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, Vera. 1998. ‘Contested remembrance: the Hiroshima exhibit controversy.’ Theory and Society 27(4), pp. 565–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Yifat Gutman, Adam D. Brown and Amy Sodaro

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gutman, Y., Sodaro, A., Brown, A.D. (2010). Introduction: Memory and the Future: Why a Change of Focus is Necessary. In: Gutman, Y., Brown, A.D., Sodaro, A. (eds) Memory and the Future. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292338_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics