Abstract
After a series of false starts, a ‘Museum of Europe’ recently opened in Brussels, albeit as a temporary exhibition marking fifty years since the Treaties of Rome. The museum, which is still seeking a permanent home, is dedicated to building a sense of common European identity through a narrative of European history.1 Part of the museum’s proposed permanent exhibit is devoted to a series of active maps, the last of which, representing European history after 1945, is in a room fashioned to resemble a railway waiting room. Visitors can gaze up to a moving map, which, like the flipping departures board ‘in a large European railway station’, shows the ‘arrival’ of nations in Europe. ‘After the centuries of Unity through faith and the decades of Unity through the Enlightenment [represented in other maps], the Unity through the project evolves year for year, as shown by a digital counter.,2 While this narrative of Europe’s history is at best questionable, the metaphor of the train for the project of Europe is by no means inept.3 If anything, it is too apt: while it is meant to support an optimistic story of steady modernization, the associations between Europe and material networks, particularly trains, are not so easily channelled. Observers in this waiting room might just as easily think of other trains, and darker sides of European history and modernity: the trains that never arrived, such as the pre-war Berlin–Baghdad Railway or many sections of the German-Dutch Betuwe line project, never stopped, leaving certain towns and places off the map of ‘European’ progress, or, like the trains in the brutal machinery of the Holocaust, never returned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For critiques of this narrative, see Jan Nederveen Pieterse, ‘Fictions of Europe’, Race and Class 32(2) (1991), pp. 3–10
Cris Shore, Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration (London: Routledge 2000), pp. 59–60.
See Akira Iriye, Global community. The role of international organisations in the making of the contemporary world (Berkeley: University of California Press 2002).
See Waqar Zaidi, Science and Technology & Liberal Internationalism in France, the United States and Great Britain, 1920–1945 (PhD Thesis, Imperial College, London, 2009).
See Jo-Anne Pemberton, ‘New worlds for old: the League of Nations in the age of electricity’, Review of International Relations, 28 (2002), pp. 311–36; Shore, Building Europe, pp. 113–14.
Daniel Headrick, The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850–1940 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988); The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1981).
See further Dirk van Laak, Imperiale Infrastruktur. Deutsche Planungen für eine Erschließung Afrikas 1880 bis 1960 (Paderborn: F. Schöningh 2004).
Ole B. Jensen and Tim Richardson, Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity (London: Routledge 2004).
The Transnational Infrastructures and the Rise of Contemporary Europe (TIE) Project: www.tie-project.nl, led by Professor Johan Schot and supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research under the VICI scheme (dossiernummer 277–53-001). Key publications from this project to date include Vincent Lagendijk, Electrifying Europe: The Power of Europe in the Construction of Electricity Networks (Amsterdam: Aksant/SHT 2008)
Frank Schipper, Driving Europe. Building Europe on Roads in the Twentieth Century (Amsterdam, Aksant/SHT 2008)
Irene Anastasiadou, In Search of a Railway Europe: International Railway Developments in Interwar Europe (PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2009).
Ibid., pp. 22–3. Ben Rosamond similarly describes how the language of describing integration entrenches such notions in ‘The political sciences of European integration: disciplinary history and EU studies’, in Knud Erik Jørgensen, Mark A. Pollack and Ben Rosamond (eds) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage 2007), pp. 7–30.
Hartmut Kaelble, Auf dem Weg zu einer europäischen Gesellschaft. Eine Sozialgeschichte Westeuropas, 1880–1980 (München: Beck 1987).
Some of the richer recent discussions include Iriye, Global community; Akira Iriye, ‘Transnational history’, Contemporary European History 13(2) (2004), pp. 211–22
Patricia Clavin, ‘Introduction: defining transnationalism’, Contemporary European History 14(4) (2005), pp. 421–40
Pierre Yves Saunier, ‘Going transnational?’; Gunilla Budde, Sebastian Conrad and Oliver Janz, Transnationale Geschichte. Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006).
A good overview of their meanings and uses in the history of technology specifically, see Erik van der Vleuten, ‘Toward a transnational history of technology: meaning, promises, pitfalls’, Technology and Culture, 49 (2008), pp. 974–94.
Michael Mann, ‘Globalization, Macro-regions and nation-states’ in Budde, Conrad and Janz, Transnationale Geschichte, 21. For other more detailed versions of these dynamics see Alan Milward, The European Rescue of the Nation-State (London and New York: Routledge 2000, second edition), and a very sophisticated account of these processes in recent decades in Neil Brenner, New State Spaces (Oxford: OUP 2004).
See Iriye, Global Community; Patricia Clavin and Jens-Wilhelm Wessels, ‘Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of Its Economic and Financial Organization’, Contemporary European History 14 (2005), pp. 465–92
as an interesting corollary, which also charts a longer history, see Hartmut Kaelble, ‘The historical rise of a European public sphere?’, Journal of European Integration History 8(2) (2002), pp. 9–22.
Misa and Schot, ‘Introduction’; for narratives of fragmentation, see Andreas Fickers’ work on the line standards and colour TV formats in Europe, ‘Politique de la grandeur’ versus ‘Made in Germany’. Politische Kulturgeschichte der Technik am Beispiel der PAL/SECAM-Kontroverse (München: Oldenbourg 2007); Andreas Fickers, ‘National Barriers for an Imag(e)ined European Community: The TechnoPolitical Frames of Postwar Television Development in Europe’ in Lennard Hojbjerg and Henrik Sondergaard (eds) European Film and Media Culture, Northern Lights. Film and Media Studies Yearbook 2005 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculum Press/University of Copenhagen 2006), pp. 15–36.
Erikvan der Vleuten and Arne Kaijser (eds), Networking Europe. Transnational Infrastructures and the Shaping of Europe1850–2000 (Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications 2006).
Some articulations of this focus are Nigel Thrift, Spatial Formations (London 1996) pp. 256–310
Mimi Sheller and John Urry, ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A 38 (2006), pp. 207–26; Kevin Hannam, Mimi Sheller and John Urry, ‘Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings’, Mobilities 1(1).
Andrew Barry, Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society (London: Athlone 2001).
Ginette Verstraete, ‘Timescapes: An artistic challenge to the European Union paradigm’, European Journal of Cultural Studies 12(2) (2009), pp. 157–74.
Dirk van Laak, ‘Infra-strukturgeschichte’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft 27 (2001), p. 385.
Achim Landwehr and Stefanie Stockhorst, Einführung in die Europäische Kulturgeschichte (Paderborn: UTB 2004), pp. 264ff
See also Gerard Delanty, Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London 1995)
Bo Stråth (ed.) Europe and the Other, Europe as the Other (Brussels 2000)
Anssi Paasi, ‘Europe as a Social Process and Discourse. Considerations of Place, Boundaries and Identity’, European Urban and Regional Studies 8(1) (2001), pp. 7–28.
See Bo Stråth and Mikael af Malmborg, ‘Introduction: The National Meanings of Europe’, in Bo Stråth and Mikael af Malmborg (eds) The Meaning of Europe (Oxford: Berg 2002), pp. 1–26.
See Richard Münch, Das Projekt Europa. Zwischen Nationalstaat, regionaler Autonomie und Weltgesellschaft (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp 1993).
See Alexander Schmidt-Gernig, ‘Gibt es eine “europäische Identität”’? in Kaelble and Schriewer, Diskurse und Entwicklungspfade. Der Gesellschaftsvergleich in den Geschichts- und Sozialwissenschaften (Frankfurt: Campus 1999), pp. 163–216; David Morley has been particularly insistent on exploring the various and problematic ways in which increasingly destabilized notions of ‘home’ are remapped on and through changing structures of mediation. See his Home Territories: Media Mobility and Identity (London: Routledge 2000).
Michael G. Müller and Cornelius Torp indeed argue in a recent article that the polarity found in much scholarship between the global and the national ‘involves the danger of neglecting space as a dimension of history altogether’: ‘Conceptualising transnational spaces in history’, European Review of History 16(5) (2009), p. 611.
Pierre-Yves Saunier, ‘Learning by Doing: Notes about the Making of the Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History’, Journal of Modern European History 6(2) (2008), pp. 173–4.
For an account of these forces at a local level, see also Noyan Dinçkal, “The Universal Mission of Civilisation and Progress”. Infrastruktur, Europa und die Osmanische Stadt um 1900’, in Themenportal Europäische Geschichte (2009): http://www.europa.clio-online.de/2009/Article=348.
Interesting work has already begun in this direction. See, among others, Katrin Steffen and Martin Kohlraush, ‘The limits and merits of internationalism: experts, the state and the international community in Poland in the first half of the twentieth century’, European Review of History 16 (2009), pp. 715–37
Jiři Janac, ‘Europe through waterways: The European Coasts of Bohemia’, Tensions of Europe Working Papers, 2008_8: http://www.tensionsofeurope.eu/publications/working/workingpdf/2008_8.pdf (accessed 11 July 2009).
This is more or less the dynamic explored by the Large Technical Systems (LTS) idea built upon the pioneering works of Thomas P. Hughes. For an overview, see Erik van der Vleuten, ‘Understanding Network Societies: Two Decades of Large Technological Systems’ in Vleuten and Kaijser (eds) Networking Europe, pp. 279–314 for a critical evaluation of both the merits and limits of the LTS approach see Bernward Joerges, ‘High Variability Discourse in the History and Sociology of Large Technological Systems’ in Olivier Coutard (ed.) The Governance of Large Technological Systems (London/New York: Routledge 1999), pp. 258–90.
The problem of coupling different systems was debated on several occasions during discussions surrounding this book. One way to address these problems is tofocus more on the meso-level (as suggested by Schot in this book). Another possibility is discussed under the label of ‘resilience’. See Hans Liljenström and Uno Svedin, ‘Bridges, Connections and Interfaces — Reflections on the Meso Theme’ in Liljenström and Svedin (eds) Micro, Meso, Macro. Addressing Complex Systems Couplings (London: World Scientific 2005), pp. 317–30.
Paul N. Edwards, ‘Modernity and Infrastructures: Force, Time and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Organizations’ in Misa, Brey and Feenberg (eds) Modernity and Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2003), pp. 185–226.
See Eve Darian-Smith, Bridging Divides: The Channel Tunnel and English Legal Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press 1999)
Per Olof Berg, Anders Linde-Laursen and Orvar Löfgren (eds), Invoking a Transnational Metropolis (Lund: Studentlitteratur 2000)
Judith Schueler, Materializing Identity: the co-construction of the Gotthard Railway and Swiss national identity (Eindhoven: Aksant/SHT 2008).
See Maria Kaika and Erik Swyngedow, ‘Fetishising the modern city: the phantasmagoria of urban technological networks’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(1) (2000), pp. 120–38
Mikael Hård and Thomas J. Misa (eds), Urban Machinery: Inside Modern European Cities (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 2008); Dinçkal, ‘Universal Mission’.
Graham and Marvin, Splintering Urbanism. For a further discussion of the ‘splintering urbanism’ thesis, see Olivier Coutard, Richard Hanley and Rae Zimmerman, Sustaining Urban Networks: the Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems (London: Routledge 2005).
Bruno Latour, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford UP 2005).
See, for example, David Gugerli, ‘The Effective Fiction of Internationality. Analyzing the Emergence of a European Railroad System in the 1950s’, Preprints zur Kulturgeschichte der Technik / 2003 / 17: http://www.tg.ethz.ch/dokumente/pdf_Preprints/Preprint17.pdf (accessed 19 March 2007), and further Badenoch’s essay in this volume.
For a popular explanation of the epistemological consequences or problems of modern quantum physics and on Nils Bohr’s ‘principle of complementarity’ as an interpretation of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle see John Gribbin, In Search of Schrödinger’s Cat. Quantum Physics and Reality (London: Bantam 1984).
Tineke Egyedi, ‘Infrastructure Flexibility Created by Standardized Gateways: The Cases of XML and the ISO Container’, Knowledge, Technology & Policy 14(3) (2001), 41–54.
Paul N. Edwards et al., ‘Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, Designs’. Report of a Workshop on ‘History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures’ (January 2007), p. 16. Online at: http://www.si.umich.edu/InfrastructureWorkshop/documents/Understanding-Infrastructure2007.pdf.
Some of these roles have been captured in the notion of the ‘system-builder’ in the Large Technical Systems (LTS) tradition, which looks to the actors who are able to embed technologies within social and institutional frameworks. See Erik van der Vleuten et al., ‘Europe’s system builders: The Contested Shaping of Europe’s Road, Electricity and Rail Networks’, Contemporary European History, 16(3) (2007) 321–47; further, van der Vleuten’s chapter in this volume.
See Wolfgang Schivelbusch, Geschichte der Eisenbahnreise. Industrialisierung von Raum und Zeit im 19. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt: Fischer 1977).
Roger Silverstone and Leslie Haddon refer to this as the ‘double articulation’ of media as consumable objects as well as media for other products: ‘Design and Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life’ in Robin Mansell and Roger Silverstone, Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1996), pp. 44–74.
See the classical study of Elihu Katz and Daniel Dayan, Media Events. The Live Broadcasting of History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1994).
Nick Couldry, Media Rituals. A Critical Approach (London/New York: Routledge 2003), p. 56.
Gerhard Schulze, Die Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus 1992).
Bryan Pfaffenberger, ‘Technological Dramas’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(3) (1992), p. 286.
Such ‘biographical’ impulses lie at the root of seminal works on modern material culture: Arjun Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in cultural perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986)
specifically dealing with technology, see Bruno Latour’s innovative biography of a never-completed network, Aramis, or the love of technology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1996).
Johan Schot and Vincent Lagendijk, ‘Technocratic internationalism in the interwar years: building Europe on motorways and electricity networks’, Journal of Modern European History 6(2) (2008) 196–217.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Alexander Badenoch and Andreas Fickers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Badenoch, A., Fickers, A. (2010). Introduction Europe Materializing? Toward a Transnational History of European Infrastructures. In: Badenoch, A., Fickers, A. (eds) Materializing Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292314_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292314_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31313-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29231-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)