Skip to main content

Privacy and Law

  • Chapter

Abstract

Not much will be gained from discussing privacy and its legal regulation in the abstract. Perhaps the need for privacy is an aspect of human nature (Moore, 1984, p. 59ff.) but the form this need takes and the way that law may be used to protect this interest are neither given by nature nor likely to be interestingly the same throughout history. When considering our understandings of privacy and its appropriate regulation we are of course contemplating the world made by us, the social rather than the natural world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alldridge, P. and C. Brants (eds) (2001), Personal Autonomy, the Private Sphere and the Criminal Law ( Oxford: Hart Publishing ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. (2004), “Privacy in American Law,” in B. Rössler (ed.), Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations ( Stanford: Stanford University Press ), 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K. (2005), The Ethics of Identity ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S. (1971), “Privacy, Freedom and Respect for Persons,” Nomos, vol. XIII, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969), Four Essays on Liberty ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignami, F. (2007), “European Versus American Liberty: A Comparative Privacy Analysis Of Antiterrorism Data Mining,” Boston College Law Review, vol. 48, 609–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J. and J. Anderson (eds) (2005), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L. (2004), Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M. (1999), “A Space of One’s Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no. 1, 23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavison R. (1980), “Privacy and the Limits of the Law,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 89, 421–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss R. (2001), Public Goods, Private Goods ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F (1971), The Philosophy of Right ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. (2002), “Human Dignity in German Law,” in D. Kretzmer and E. Klein (eds), The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse ( The Hague: Kluwer Law International ), 145–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, J. (1987), “Privacy, Autonomy, and Self-Concept,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, 81–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2004), “Interpreting Doctrines of Privacy,” in B. Rössler (ed.), Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations ( Stanford: Stanford University Press ), 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1989), On Liberty, S. Collini (ed.) ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1984), Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History ( New York: Pantheon Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1988), “Concealment and Exposure,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, R. (1989), “The Social Foundations of Privacy,” California Law Review, vol. 77, 957–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, R. (2001), “Three Concepts of Privacy,” Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 89, 2087–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1975), “Why Privacy Is Important,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 4, 323–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1986), Morality of Freedom ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2001), “Privacy, Autonomy and Criminal Justice Rights: Philosophical Preliminaries,” in P. Alldridge and C. Brants (eds), Personal Autonomy, the Private Sphere and the Criminal Law: A Comparative Study ( Oxford: Hart Publishing ), 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, B. (ed.) (2004), Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations ( Stanford: Stanford University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, B. (2005), The Value of Privacy ( Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, J. (2007), Privacy in Peril ( New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. J. (2008), Understanding Privacy ( Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989), Sources of the Self ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacks, R. (2006), “Why No English Common Law Privacy Tort,” in A. Kenyon and M. Richardson (eds), New Dimensions in Privacy Law ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), 154–183.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, J. Q. (2004), “The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 113, 1151–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glass, A. (2010). Privacy and Law. In: Blatterer, H., Johnson, P., Markus, M.R. (eds) Modern Privacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290679_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics