Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series ((PMAES))

Abstract

In the last chapter, we saw that irrespective of the theoretical links between Marxism and justice for animals, the two social movements related to them possess close historical connections. Many Victorian social reformists, such as George Bernard Shaw and Henry Salt, campaigned on behalf of both workers and animals. Interestingly, the historical links between animal protection and feminism are just as strong, if not stronger. Once again, those connected roots lie in Victorian Britain where social reformers campaigned on behalf of women and animals. For example, Frances Power Cobbe was an active campaigner for women’s suffrage, and also co-founder of the Victoria Street Society for the Protection of Animals Liable to Vivisection. Anna Kingsford was one of the first women in Britain to qualify as a doctor, did so without vivisecting a single animal, and campaigned against vivisection for the rest of her life.1 Furthermore, it is certainly possible to argue that such connections have carried forward to contemporary times, not least because women comprise the bulk of campaigners in the animal protection movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Garner (2005) The Political Theory of Animal Rights (Manchester: Manchester University Press), p. 141;

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Donovan and C. Adams (2007) ‘Introduction’ in J. Donovan and C. Adams (eds) The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Gruen (2007) ‘Empathy and Vegetarian Commitments’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Donovan (2007) ‘Animal Rights and Feminist Theory’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, K. Warren (1990) ‘The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism’, Environmental Ethics, 12, 125–46;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Plumwood (1991) ‘Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism’, Hypatia, 6, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Adams (2000) The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory, 10th anniversary edn (New York: Continuum), pp. 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. MacKinnon (2007) ‘Of Mice and Men: A Fragment on Animal Rights’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 319.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See A. Cochrane (2009) ‘Ownership and Justice for Animals’, Utilitas, 21, 424–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Singer (1995) Animal Liberation, 2nd edn (London: Pimlico), p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Kelch (2007) ‘The Role of the Rational and the Emotive in a Theory of Animal Rights’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Luke (2007) ‘Justice, Caring, and Animal Liberation’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kheel (2007) ‘The Liberation of Nature: A Circular Affair’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Slicer (2007) ‘Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Gilligan (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  16. This account has been informed by R. Tong and N. Williams (2009) ‘Feminist Ethics’ in E.N. Zalta (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/feminism-ethics/ (accessed 18 June 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Noddings (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Josephine Donovan (2007) ‘Attention to Suffering’ in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Regan (1995) ‘Obligations to Animals are Based on Rights’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 8, 171–80, especially, p. 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Franklin (2005) Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Alasdair Cochrane

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cochrane, A. (2010). Feminism and Animals. In: An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290594_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics