Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bauman’s Implicit Theology

  • Chapter
Bauman’s Challenge

  • 298 Accesses

Abstract

Mixing sociology with religion and theology generates a cocktail very few English sociologists care to sip, even after 9/11. The bartending activities producing such toxic cultural and political mixtures violate the foundational aspirations of English sociology which sought to overthrow an establishment patrician culture, in which the theology of Anglicanism played a significant legitimizing part (Halsey 1987). Theology is treated as incredible, archaic and regressive. Most English sociologists are pleased to act as bouncers on the field of culture, regarding those who would plant the seeds of faith there as representing all the discipline was formed to denounce and replace. A strange land now, English society conceives of itself as living in a state of post-secularity, beyond religion and rendering civil inattention to any of its activities. Thus, in times when identity politics is shaped by inclusiveness for all, religion is bracketed with suspicion and designated as ‘unrecognised’ and somehow unfit for inclusion in civil, refined life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Badham, P. (2008), ‘Concepts of Heaven and Hell in the Modern Era’, in Peter C. Jupp (ed.) Death Our Future: Christian Theology and Pastoral Practice in Funeral Ministry, London: Epworth, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, J. (2003), ‘Moral Choices in the Age of Gas Chambers’, in Peter Wagner and Bo Stråth (eds), Between Two Wars: Janina and Zygmunt Bauman’s Analyses of the Contemporary Human Condition, Florence: European University Institute Working paper HEC No. 2003/4, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1967), ‘Image of Man in the Modern Sociology (Some methodological remarks)’. Polish Sociological Bulletin, 1: 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989), Modernity and the Holocaust, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992), Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1996), ‘Assimilation into Exile: The Jew as a Polish Writer’. Poetics Today, 17 (4): 569–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998), ‘Postmodern religion?’ in Paul Heelas (ed.), Religion, Modernity and Postmodernity, Oxford: Blackwell, 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000a), ‘Am I my brother’s keeper?’. European Journal of Social Work, 3 (1): 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000b), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001), The Individualized Society, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2002), ‘Pierre Bourdieu or the Dialectics of Vita Contemplativa and Vita Activa’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 2 (220): 179–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2003), Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2006), Liquid Fear, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2008), The Art of Life, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. and Keith, T. (2001), Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995), The Normal Chaos of Love, trans. Mark Ritter and Jane Wiebel, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilharz, P. (2000), Zygmunt Bauman: Dialectic of Modernitv, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI (2006), Deus Caritas Est, London: Catholic Truth Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw, T. (2006), ‘Too Good for Sociology’. Polish Sociological Review, 3 (155): 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2000), Pascalian Meditations, trans. Richard Nice, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buci-Glucksmann, C. (1994), Baroque Reason: The Aesthetics of Modernity, trans. Patrick Camiller, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cladis, M. S. (2008), ‘Suffering to Become Human: A Durkheimian Perspective’, in W. S. F. Pickering and Massimo Rosati (eds), Suffering and Evil: The Durkheimian Legacy, Oxford: Berghahn, 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (1992), ‘How to become an Internationally Famous British Social Theorist’. The Sociological Review, 40 (2): 576–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (ed.) (1963), ‘Introduction’, in Sociology Through Literature, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1969) ‘The Visibility of Evil’, Journal of Social Issues, 25(1): 101–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creelan, P. (1984), ‘Vicissitudes of the Sacred: Erving Goffman and the Book of Job’. Theory and Society, 13: 663–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1968), Essays in the Theory of Society, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2002), Purity and Danger, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, K. (2006), ‘The Church in Liquid Modernity: A Sociological and Theological Exploration of a Liquid Church’. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 6 (1): 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, K. (2007), Sociology in Theology: Reflexivity and Belief, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, K. (2008), ‘Sociology into Theology: The Unacceptable Leap’. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8): 236–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, K. (2009), ‘Conversion: Heroes and their Sociological Redemption’, in Guiseppe Giordan, ed., Conversion in the Age of Pluralism, Leiden: Brill, 33–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love & Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967), ‘Where the Action Is’, in Interaction Ritual, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 149–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (1987), ‘Provincials and Professionals: The British Post-War Sociologists’. LSE Quarterly, 1 (1): 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1975), Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health, London: Calder & Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankélévitch, S. (2008), ‘Le Suicide and Psychological Suffering’, in W.S.F. Pickering and Massimo Rosati (eds), Suffering and Evil: The Durkheimian Legacy, Oxford: Berghahn, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (2003), Refractions of Violence, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, P. C. (2008a), ‘The Context of Christian Funeral Ministry Today’, in Peter C. Jupp, ed., Death Our Future: Christian Theology and Funeral Practice, London: Epworth, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, P. C. (2008b), ‘Changing Christian Beliefs about the Afterlife’, in Peter C. Jupp, (ed.), Death Our Future: Christian Theology and Funeral Practice, London: Epworth, 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kołakowski, L. (1997), Modernity on Endless Trial, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski, L. (1998), God Owes Us Nothing, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kołakowski, L. (2001a), Metaphysical Horror, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kołakowski, L. (2001b), Religion: If There is No God…, South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, V. (2008), ‘Interview with Gillian Rose’. Theory, Culture & Society, 25 (7–8): 201–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, A. (2007), ‘On Restlessness’. Communio, 34 (2): 176–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, J. (2008), Lecture to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Sandford St. Martin Trust, The Daily Telegraph, 1st October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (1974), ‘Cultic Aspects of Sociology: A Speculative Essay’. The British Journal of Sociology, 25 (1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1975), Collected Works, vol. 3, London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendieta, E. (ed.) (2004), The Frankfurt School on Religion: Key Writings by the Major Thinkers, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. (2002), Sociology as an Art Form, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, G. (2008), ‘Some concepts of “Evil” in Durkheim’s Thought’, in W. S. F. Pickering and Massimo Rosati (eds), Suffering and Evil: The Durkheimian Legacy, Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, W. S. F. and Massimo Rosati (eds) (2008), Suffering and Evil: The Durkheimian Legacy, Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1995), Love’s Work, London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1998), ‘The Final Notebooks of Gillian Rose’. Women: A Cultural Review, 9 (1): 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, R. (1993), Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. C. (2007a), ‘Why we Need Paul Claudel’. Communio, 34 (1): 120–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. C. (2007b), ‘Restlessness as an Image of God’. Communio, 34 (2): 264–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca (2005), Dialogues and Letters, ed. and trans. C.D.N. Costa, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servais, J. (2007), ‘Restlessness as an Image of God’. Communio, 34 (2): 224–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, A. (2008), Against Innocence: Gillian Rose’s Reception and Gift of Faith, London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Augustine (1997), The Confessions, trans. Maria Boulding O.S.B., London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. R. (1963), ‘The Poetic Metaphors of Sociology’, in Maurice Stein and Arthur Vidich (eds), Sociology on Trial, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, F. (1967), Taboo, Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, K. (2004), The Social Thought of Zygmunt Bauman, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torevell, D. (1995), ‘The Terrorism of Reason in the Thought of Zygmunt Bauman’. New Blackfriars, 76 (889): 141–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (1994), ‘Introduction’, in Christine Buci-Glucksmann, Baroque Reason: The Aesthetics of Modernity, trans. Patrick Camiller, London: Sage, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. (2002), Liquid Church, Cumbria: Paternoster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, R. (1989), ‘Experience and Materialism in Benjamin’s Passagenwerk’, in Gary Smith (ed.), Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 210–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. (2008), ‘Shun Idols’. The Catholic World Report, 19 (10): 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kieran Flanagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Leeds, UK

    Mark Davis

  2. University of Hull, UK

    Keith Tester

Copyright information

© 2010 Kieran Flanagan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flanagan, K. (2010). Bauman’s Implicit Theology. In: Davis, M., Tester, K. (eds) Bauman’s Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290457_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation