Skip to main content

Industry Analysts and the Labour of Comparison

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers how incommensurable artefacts and actors are brought together, the relationships between them standardized, so that they can be compared in the same space. This issue — described here as the labour of comparison — is beginning to attract attention from scholars in Science and Technology Studies (STS), Economic Sociology, Organization Studies and beyond. Some have gone as far as to conceptualize the economy in a way that comparison is central to its organization (Callon et al., 2002). Within this view, what has been termed as an ‘economy of qualities’ (Callon et al., 2002), the experts that measure and classify the properties of technologies and products are key. When lacking the devices to establish equivalence, how can different objects be brought together and compared? Without the practices to produce differences how can similar commodities be sorted out? The labour of comparison is not without politics or complexities (Barry, 2006; Mol, 2002; Porter, 1995) particularly concerning the status and detachment of experts who perform this work, the devices used in their craft, the identification of the properties to be measured and the calculations and actions that stem from these practices (Callon and Muniesa, 2005). The labour of comparison and its related politics and complexities, should be of wider interest to scholars interested in objects and the economy, technologies and standardization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Austin, J. L. (1962), How to Do Things With Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1983), ‘Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction’, Sociology 17, pp. 524–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (2006), ‘Technological Zones’, European Journal of Social Theory 9(2), pp. 239–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. and D. Slater (eds) (2005), The Technological Economy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, B. and T. Vurdubakis (2002), ‘The Vision Thing: Constructing Technology and the Future in Management Advice’, in T. Clark and R. Fincham (eds), Critical Consulting (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. and T. Aston (2004), ‘How Gartner Evaluates Vendors in a Market’, Document ID Number: G00123716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (2007), ‘What Does it Mean to Say that Economics is Performative?’ in D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa and L. Siu (eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., C. Meadel and V. Rabeharisoa (2002), ‘The Economy of Qualities’, Economy and Society 32, pp. 194–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and F. Muniesa (2005), ‘Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices’, Organization Studies 26(8), pp. 1229–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cant, S. (2002), ‘Analyze This’, Sydney Morning Herald, 16thApril, http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/04/16/101833475874.html, accessed 29 March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, D. and E. Swanson (2005), ‘How Useful are IT Research and Analysis Services?’ Business Horizons 48(2), pp. 151–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2002), ‘Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective’, Business History Review 76, pp. 37–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999), The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hind, P. (2004), ‘Self-Fulfilling Prophecies?’ CIO, 12 July, http://www.cio.au/pp.php?id=885195886andfp=4&fpid=1854618785, accessed 29 March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. (2004), ‘Let’s Play the Magic Quadrant Game’, The Register, 24 December, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/24/magic_quadrant/print.html, accessed 22 February 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. and D. Wilson (2006), ‘Actionable Strategy Knowledge: A Practice Perspective’, European Management Journal 24(5), pp. 348–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action, How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissack, M. and K. Richardson (2003), ‘Models Without Morals: Toward the Ethical Use of Business Models’, Emergence 5(2), pp. 72–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (2003), ‘An Equation and its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics’, Social Studies of Science 33(6), pp. 831–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (2009), Material Markets: How Economics Agents are Constructed (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2001), ‘Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter’, Social Research 68(2), pp. 379–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002), ‘Cutting Surgeons, Walking Patients: Some Complexities Involved in Comparing’, in J. Law and A. Mol (eds), Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. and M. Morrison (1999), Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, N. and R. Williams (2007), ‘Technology Choice and its Performance: Towards a Sociology of Software Package Procurement’, Information and Organisation 17, pp. 131–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, N. and R. Williams (2009), Software and Organizations: The Biography of the Enterprise-wide System or How SAP Conquered the World (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1995), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A. (2006), ‘Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists’, Science as Culture 15(4), pp. 349–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soejarto, A. and F. Karamouzis (2005), ‘Magic Quadrants for North American ERP Service Providers’, Gartner Document, ID Number: G00127206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Violino, B. and R. Levin (1997), ‘Analyzing the Analysts’, Information Week, 17 November, http://informationweek.com/657/57iuana.htm, accessed 29 March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Neil Pollock

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pollock, N. (2010). Industry Analysts and the Labour of Comparison. In: Higgins, V., Larner, W. (eds) Calculating the Social. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289673_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics