Abstract
The swadeshi and boycott movement,1 and the revolutionary movement were a part of the Information Empire in which the telegraph was an essential factor. The particular moment and nature of articulation of swadeshi was the product of rapid informational change. Telegraph rates and press rates were crucial to its rise. This chapter shows how imperialism created the technological environment which facilitated the growth of its opposite: nationalism. The telegraph strike was as much a political crisis for the government as was the swadeshi and subsequent revolutionary movements. Both were part of a global information order, though each claimed independence from each other. The international representation of Indian nationalism was followed by its articulation in India. The lowering of telegraph rates and the loosening of Reuters grip over Indian news facilitated this nationalism. For nearly a century British India was ‘destined to play a central and highly profitable part in the Reuters empire within the British Empire’.2 Reuters monopolised the supply of news to both English and vernacular papers3 until further reductions in rates allowed more regional news reporting to emerge. Traditional historiography is discussed in this chapter to show how fresh insights can be gained by analysing communication systems and the information order.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Donald Read, The Power of News: The History of Reuters Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 63.
For a discussion of the intellectual origins of the movement see C.A. Bayly, Origins of Nationality in South Asia: Patriotism and Ethical Government in the Making of Modern India Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998.
V.I. Lenin, The Heritage We Renounce London: NA 1897, p. 74.
Das, India under Morley and Minto S. Gopal, British Policy in India Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965; A. Seal, The Emergence of Indian Nationalism: Competition and Collaboration in the Later Nineteenth Century Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968; R.K. Ray, Urban Roots of Indian Nationalism Delhi: Vikas, 1979.
S. Sarkar, The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal 1903–1908 Delhi: People’s Publishing House, 1973.
Benoyjiban Ghosh, Revolt of 1905 in Bengal Calcutta: South Asia Books, 1987
D. Laushey, Bengal Terrorism and the Marxist Left 1905–1942 Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay, 1975.
R.K. Ray, Social Conflict and Political Unrest in Bengal 1875–1927 Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984
C.A. Bayly, The Local Roots of Indian Politics: Allahabad 1880–1920 Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.
S. Das, Communal Riots in Bengal 1905–1947 Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1991.
R. Chandavarkar, Imperial Power and Popular Politics: Class, Resistance and the State in India c. 1850–1950 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
R. Chandavarkar, The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay 1900–1940 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
R.J. Popplewell, Intelligence and Imperial Defence: British Intelligence and the Defence of the Indian Empire, 1904–1924 London: Frank Cass, 1995.
David Arnold, ‘The Armed Police and Colonial Rule in South India, 1914–1947’, Modern Asian Studies vol. II, no. 1, 1977; David Arnold, Police Power and Colonial Rule: Madras 1859–1947 Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987.
D. Dignan, The Indian Revolutionary Movement in British Diplomacy 1914–1919 Delhi: Allied Publishers, 1983.
J.M. MacKenzie, Propaganda and Empire: The Manipulation of British Public Opinion 1880–1960 Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
Leonard A. Gordon, ‘Portrait of a Bengal Revolutionary’, Journal of Asian Studies XVII, February 1968, pp. 197–216.
Gopal Haider, ‘Revolutionary Terrorism’, in Atul Chandra Gupta (ed.), Studies in the Bengal Renaissance Calcutta: National Council of Education, 1958, p. 242; cited in David M. Laushey, Bengal Terrorism and the Marxist Left 1905–1942 Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay, 1975, p. 7.
John Morley, Rousseau vol. I [1712–78], London: Macmillan and Co., 1910.
George MacMunn, The Underworld of India London: Jarrolds, 1933, p. 135.
Minto Papers, Minto to Morley, 15 August 1906, roll no. 5, cited in Stephen F. Koss, John Morley at the India Office 1905–1910 Yale: Yale University Press, 1969, p. 103.
Cf. F.C. Isemonger and J. Slattery (comp.), Confidential: An Account of the Ghadr Conspiracy 1913–15 Lahore: Government Printing, 1919. NL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Deep Kanta Lahiri Choudhury
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choudhury, D.K.L. (2010). Swadeshi and Information Panic: Functions and Malfunctions of the Information Order, c. 1900–12. In: Telegraphic Imperialism. The Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289604_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289604_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30171-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28960-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)