Abstract
Although the New Criticism encouraged a sharp distinction between the language of poetry and the language of science, it has increasingly been recognised that modernist poets took cognizance of scientific developments. What is harder to determine is the nature of the relationship. Science is often mentioned in contextualising introductions to modernism, but many such introductions give students a relatively superficial acquaintance with illustrious names. How can one help students to become knowledge producers rather than passive acquirers, in the face of the real and the perceived difficulties of science? Several problems need to be addressed: problems of the authority of science, problems of knowledge, and problems concerning what counts as knowledge. More mundanely, because the relevant prose texts are not always readily available, and some of the most interesting poets are not canonical, there are problems of resources. In what follows, I have assumed that seminars are the best environment for learning from this material. If lectures are offered in support, it is important that they leave scope for further discussion in seminars. The sometimes arcane nature of the material, and the intimidating authority of science, can leave students more than usually anxious that the poem is a puzzle with only one correct solution, not a space for imaginative exploration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works cited and further reading
Albright, Daniel (1997) Quantum Poetics: Yeats, Pound, Eliot, and the Science of Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, Tim (2000) ‘Poetry and Science’, in Neil Roberts (ed.), A Companion to Twentieth-Century Poetry in English. Oxford: Blackwell, 76–88.
Bell, Ian F. A. (1981) Critic as Scientist: the Modernist Poetics of Ezra Pound. London: Methuen.
Bradbury, Malcolm and James McFarlane (eds) (1976) Modernism, 1890–1930. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bradshaw, David (1996) ‘The Best of Companions: J. W. N. Sullivan, Aldous Huxley, and the New Physics’, Review of English Studies 47: 188–206, 352–68.
Bunting, Basil (1994) The Complete Poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cain, Sarah (1999) ‘The Metaphorical Field: Post-Newtonian Physics and Modernist Literature’, Cambridge Quarterly 28: 46–64.
Crundell, H. W. (1919) ‘Art and Science’, Athenaeum (4 July): 566.
Day Lewis, C. (1957) The Poet’s Way of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Day Lewis, C. and L. A. G. Strong (1941) Introduction to A New Anthology of Modern Verse, 1920–1940. London: Methuen, xiii–xiv.
Eliot, T. S. (1918) ‘Contemporanea’, The Egoist 5(6) (June/July 1918): 84.
Eliot, T. S. (1920) ‘Ben Jonson’, The Sacred Wood. London: Methuen.
Eliot, T. S. (1920) ‘Modern Tendencies in Poetry’, Shama’a 1: 9–18.
Empson, William (2000) The Complete Poems, ed. John Haffenden. London: Allen Lane.
Foster, Steven (1965) ‘Relativity and The Waste Land: a Postulate’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language 7: 77–95. [Far from satisfactory, but could be used as a test case in relation to methodology.]
Frank, Waldo (1924) ‘For a Declaration of War’, Secession 7: 5–14.
Friedman, Alan J. and Carol C. Donley (1985) Einstein as Myth and Muse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Gives brief coverage to a wide range of poets and novelists who drew upon Einstein.]
Fry, Roger (1919) ‘Art and Science’, Athenaeum (6 June): 434–5.
Gibson, W. W. (1919) ‘Chambers’, Athenaeum (11 July): 583.
Gibson, W. W. (1920) Windows The Fortnightly Review n.s. 113: 570–1.
Heath-Stubbs, John and Phillips Salman (eds) (1984) Poems of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Heilbron, J. L. (1982) ‘Fin-de-Siècle Physics’, in Carl Gustaf Bernhard, Elisabeth Crawford, and Per Sörbom (eds), Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel. Nobel Symposium, 52. Oxford: Pergamon, 51–73.
Herbert, Christopher (2001) Victorian Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holton, Gerald (1973) Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hulme, T. E. (1994) The Collected Writings of T. E. Hulme, ed. Karen Csengeri. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hutcheon, Linda (1984) Formalism and the Freudian Aesthetic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kayman, Martin A. (1986) The Modernism of Ezra Pound: the Science of Poetry. London: Macmillan.
Kenner, Hugh (1988) Self-Similarity, Fractals, Cantos ELH 55: 721–9.
MacNeice, Louis (2007) ‘Star Gazer’, Collected Poems, ed. Peter MacDonald. London: Faber & Faber, 607–8.
Middleton, Peter (2007) Can Poetry Be Scientific? in Philip Coleman (ed.), On Literature and Science: Essays, Reflections, Provocations. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 190–208.
Morgan, Edwin (1973) ‘At the Television Set’, From Glasgow to Saturn. Cheadle: Carcanet, 22.
Poincaré, Henri (1905) Science and Hypothesis. London: Walter Scott.
Poincaré, Henri (1914) Science and Method, trans. F. Maitland. London: Thomas Nelson.
Pound, Ezra (1954) Literary Essays ofEzra Pound, ed. T. S. Eliot. London: Faber & Faber.
Richards, I. A. (1919) ‘Art and Science’, Athenaeum (27 June): 534–5.
Richards, I. A. (1926) Science and Poetry. London: Kegan Paul.
Richards, I. A. (1970) Poetries and Sciences. London: Routledge. [A significant revision of the 1926 book.]
Riordan, Maurice and Jon Turney (eds) (2000) A Quark for Mister Mark: 101 Poems About Science. London: Faber & Faber.
Roberts, Michael (1928) ‘Credo: a Note on Poetry and Science’, Poetry Review 19: 192–6.
Roberts, Michael (1928) ‘On Mechanical Hallelujahs, or How Not To Do It’, Poetry Review 19: 433–8.
Roberts, Michael (1930) These Our Matins. London: Elkin Mathews.
Roberts, Michael (1958) Collected Poems. London: Faber & Faber.
Roberts, Michael (1980) Selected Poems andProse, ed. Frederick Grubb. Manchester: Carcanet.
Rousseau, G. S. (1978) ‘Literature and Science: the State of the Field’, Isis 69: 583–91. [Outdated, but still an important introduction to the development of the field.]
Ryan, Richard (c.1973) ‘Galaxy’, in John Heath-Stubbs and Phillips Salman (eds), Poems of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 314–15.
Smith, Grover (ed.) (1963) Josiah Royce’s Seminar, 1913–1914. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Place of Science’, Athenaeum (11 April): 176.
Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Justification of the Scientific Method’, Athenaeum (2 May): 275.
Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Notion of Simultaneity’, Athenaeum (23 May): 369.
Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Equivalence Principle’, Athenaeum (6 June): 433.
Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘Science and Personality’, Athenaeum (18 July): 624.
Sullivan, J. W. N. (1923) ‘The Interest of Science’, Aspects of Science. London: Cobden-Sanderson, 9–22. [Incorporates ‘The Place of Science’ and ‘Justification’.]
Turner, W. J. (1921) ‘In Time Like Glass’, In Time Like Glass. London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1.
Whitworth, Michael H. (1996) ‘Pièces D’identité: T. S. Eliot, J. W. N. Sullivan and Poetic Impersonality’, English Literature in Transition 39: 149–70.
Whitworth, Michael H. (2001) Einstein’s Wake: Relativity, Metaphor, and Modernist Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Michael H. Whitworth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whitworth, M.H. (2010). Science and Poetry. In: Middleton, P., Marsh, N. (eds) Teaching Modernist Poetry. Teaching the New English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289536_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289536_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-20233-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28953-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)