Skip to main content

Science and Poetry

  • Chapter
  • 163 Accesses

Part of the book series: Teaching the New English ((TENEEN))

Abstract

Although the New Criticism encouraged a sharp distinction between the language of poetry and the language of science, it has increasingly been recognised that modernist poets took cognizance of scientific developments. What is harder to determine is the nature of the relationship. Science is often mentioned in contextualising introductions to modernism, but many such introductions give students a relatively superficial acquaintance with illustrious names. How can one help students to become knowledge producers rather than passive acquirers, in the face of the real and the perceived difficulties of science? Several problems need to be addressed: problems of the authority of science, problems of knowledge, and problems concerning what counts as knowledge. More mundanely, because the relevant prose texts are not always readily available, and some of the most interesting poets are not canonical, there are problems of resources. In what follows, I have assumed that seminars are the best environment for learning from this material. If lectures are offered in support, it is important that they leave scope for further discussion in seminars. The sometimes arcane nature of the material, and the intimidating authority of science, can leave students more than usually anxious that the poem is a puzzle with only one correct solution, not a space for imaginative exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited and further reading

  • Albright, Daniel (1997) Quantum Poetics: Yeats, Pound, Eliot, and the Science of Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Tim (2000) ‘Poetry and Science’, in Neil Roberts (ed.), A Companion to Twentieth-Century Poetry in English. Oxford: Blackwell, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Ian F. A. (1981) Critic as Scientist: the Modernist Poetics of Ezra Pound. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, Malcolm and James McFarlane (eds) (1976) Modernism, 1890–1930. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, David (1996) ‘The Best of Companions: J. W. N. Sullivan, Aldous Huxley, and the New Physics’, Review of English Studies 47: 188–206, 352–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, Basil (1994) The Complete Poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Sarah (1999) ‘The Metaphorical Field: Post-Newtonian Physics and Modernist Literature’, Cambridge Quarterly 28: 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crundell, H. W. (1919) ‘Art and Science’, Athenaeum (4 July): 566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day Lewis, C. (1957) The Poet’s Way of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day Lewis, C. and L. A. G. Strong (1941) Introduction to A New Anthology of Modern Verse, 1920–1940. London: Methuen, xiii–xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T. S. (1918) ‘Contemporanea’, The Egoist 5(6) (June/July 1918): 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T. S. (1920) ‘Ben Jonson’, The Sacred Wood. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T. S. (1920) ‘Modern Tendencies in Poetry’, Shama’a 1: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empson, William (2000) The Complete Poems, ed. John Haffenden. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Steven (1965) ‘Relativity and The Waste Land: a Postulate’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language 7: 77–95. [Far from satisfactory, but could be used as a test case in relation to methodology.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Waldo (1924) ‘For a Declaration of War’, Secession 7: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Alan J. and Carol C. Donley (1985) Einstein as Myth and Muse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Gives brief coverage to a wide range of poets and novelists who drew upon Einstein.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, Roger (1919) ‘Art and Science’, Athenaeum (6 June): 434–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. W. (1919) ‘Chambers’, Athenaeum (11 July): 583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. W. (1920) Windows The Fortnightly Review n.s. 113: 570–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath-Stubbs, John and Phillips Salman (eds) (1984) Poems of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, J. L. (1982) ‘Fin-de-Siècle Physics’, in Carl Gustaf Bernhard, Elisabeth Crawford, and Per Sörbom (eds), Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel. Nobel Symposium, 52. Oxford: Pergamon, 51–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, Christopher (2001) Victorian Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, Gerald (1973) Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, T. E. (1994) The Collected Writings of T. E. Hulme, ed. Karen Csengeri. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda (1984) Formalism and the Freudian Aesthetic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayman, Martin A. (1986) The Modernism of Ezra Pound: the Science of Poetry. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenner, Hugh (1988) Self-Similarity, Fractals, Cantos ELH 55: 721–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeice, Louis (2007) ‘Star Gazer’, Collected Poems, ed. Peter MacDonald. London: Faber & Faber, 607–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, Peter (2007) Can Poetry Be Scientific? in Philip Coleman (ed.), On Literature and Science: Essays, Reflections, Provocations. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 190–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Edwin (1973) ‘At the Television Set’, From Glasgow to Saturn. Cheadle: Carcanet, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri (1905) Science and Hypothesis. London: Walter Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri (1914) Science and Method, trans. F. Maitland. London: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pound, Ezra (1954) Literary Essays ofEzra Pound, ed. T. S. Eliot. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I. A. (1919) ‘Art and Science’, Athenaeum (27 June): 534–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I. A. (1926) Science and Poetry. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I. A. (1970) Poetries and Sciences. London: Routledge. [A significant revision of the 1926 book.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, Maurice and Jon Turney (eds) (2000) A Quark for Mister Mark: 101 Poems About Science. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Michael (1928) ‘Credo: a Note on Poetry and Science’, Poetry Review 19: 192–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Michael (1928) ‘On Mechanical Hallelujahs, or How Not To Do It’, Poetry Review 19: 433–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Michael (1930) These Our Matins. London: Elkin Mathews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Michael (1958) Collected Poems. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Michael (1980) Selected Poems andProse, ed. Frederick Grubb. Manchester: Carcanet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, G. S. (1978) ‘Literature and Science: the State of the Field’, Isis 69: 583–91. [Outdated, but still an important introduction to the development of the field.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Richard (c.1973) ‘Galaxy’, in John Heath-Stubbs and Phillips Salman (eds), Poems of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 314–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Grover (ed.) (1963) Josiah Royce’s Seminar, 1913–1914. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Place of Science’, Athenaeum (11 April): 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Justification of the Scientific Method’, Athenaeum (2 May): 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Notion of Simultaneity’, Athenaeum (23 May): 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘The Equivalence Principle’, Athenaeum (6 June): 433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. N. (1919) ‘Science and Personality’, Athenaeum (18 July): 624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. N. (1923) ‘The Interest of Science’, Aspects of Science. London: Cobden-Sanderson, 9–22. [Incorporates ‘The Place of Science’ and ‘Justification’.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. J. (1921) ‘In Time Like Glass’, In Time Like Glass. London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, Michael H. (1996) ‘Pièces D’identité: T. S. Eliot, J. W. N. Sullivan and Poetic Impersonality’, English Literature in Transition 39: 149–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, Michael H. (2001) Einstein’s Wake: Relativity, Metaphor, and Modernist Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Michael H. Whitworth

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitworth, M.H. (2010). Science and Poetry. In: Middleton, P., Marsh, N. (eds) Teaching Modernist Poetry. Teaching the New English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289536_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics