Conclusion

  • Carlos M. Peláez
  • Carlos A. Peláez
Part of the Palgrave Texts in Finance and Monetary Economics book series (PTFME)

Abstract

Debtor countries need to manage their external relations to prevent crises and find rapid resolution to those that occur, which motivates this long exegesis of official doctrine and practices by private creditors. It would be alarming to invoke crises in other countries, but debtor countries do have the risk of a sudden stop of external capital flows, or reversal of flows, which actually happened in Mexico in 1994–95, Argentina currently and in 1994–95, Asia 1997–98 and Russia, Brazil and LTCM 1998. Private creditors and investors must engage in due diligence when providing credit to countries, analyzing carefully vulnerabilities and their probable impact on the value of their assets.

Keywords

Europe Argentina Indonesia Ecuador 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 21.
    Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for Directives of the European Parliament and the Council (Brussels: Jul 14, 2004).Google Scholar
  2. 28.
    Price, Waterhouse, Coopers, Study on the Financial and Macroeconomic Consequences of the Draft Proposed New Capital Requirements for Banks and Investment Firms in the EU (Brussels: European Commission, Apr 8, 2004 ).Google Scholar
  3. 33.
    Charles Pretzlik and David Wrighton, “Financial Regulators Slated for Discord,” Financial Times, Mar, 3, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 35.
    Darrell Duffie, “Irresistible Reasons for Better Models of Credit Risk,” Financial Times, Apr 15, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 42.
    Charles Pretzlik, Gary Silverman and Andreas Krosta, “Basel II is More Risk-Sensitive,” Financial Times, Jun 16, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 43.
    Jane Croft, “HBOS Sees Growth in Savings and Mortgages,” Financial Times, Jun 24, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 46.
    Charles Pretzlik and Gary Silverman, “US Regulator Questions Basel Timetable,” Financial Times, Jun 16, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 47.
    Stephen Timewell, “Basel II: Complex Catalyst for Change,” The Banker, Jun 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 54.
    Joshua Chaffin and Charles Pretzlik, “US Senators Anxious about Basel II Banking Reforms,” Financial Times, Jun 19, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 55.
    PriceWaterhouseCoopers, “No Reprieve for Risk Managers,” Bangkok Post, Thailand, Jun 3, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 56.
    David G. Strongin, “Basel II Must Accommodate Securities Firms,” Financial Times, Jun 20, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carlos M. Peláez & Carlos A. Peláez 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Peláez
  • Carlos A. Peláez

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations