Skip to main content

Abstract

The timing of employees’ work hours and the degree to which they are able to exercise control over it are increasingly important determinants of workers’ motivation, behaviour and effort at work. More sectors in the global economy are moving toward operating on a round-the-clock service or continuous production. At the same time, dual-income households and annual and weekly work hours (in the US) are climbing. These forces have contributed to a spreading out of the workday, and thus a growing value being attached to the temporal flexibility in work schedules and the timing of work activities (e.g. Fagan, 2001; Hamermesh, 1999; Presser, 1995). Flexible schedules are perceived to help reduce the chronic pressures imposed on workers by time and role conflicts that arise when work and non-work responsibilities overlap in the same block of time. Flexible work schedules are being implemented by organizations in certain sectors as either or both a prized employee benefit to promote employee retention and as a device to curb forms of employee withdrawal, such as absenteeism, tardiness, quits and on-thejob leisure. Flexibility is thus becoming an ever more important tool for improving individual, organizational and national productivity, including indirectly by attempting to curb various employee misbehaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmadi, M., Raiszedeh, F. and Wells, W. (1986) ‘Traditional vs. non-traditional work schedules: a case study of employee preference’, Industrial Management, 28(2), 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ala-Mursula, L., Vahtera, J., Kivim, M., Kevin, M. and Pentti, J. (2002) ‘Employee control over working times: associations with subjective health and sickness absences’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(4), 272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. (1987) ‘An empirical model of work attendance’, Review of Economics and Statistics, February, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E. D. and Kaplan, S. (2002) ‘The effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout and behavioral job outcomes in public accounting’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L., Drago, R. and Kochan, T. (2001) Integrating Work and Family Life: A Holistic Approach. Report for Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Work-Family Policy Network, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B., Briggs, T., Wright, J. and Neuman, G. (1999) ‘Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: a meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel, E. A., Moss, S., Smyrnios, K. and Tharenou, P. (1999) ‘Employee characteristics associated with the provision of work-family policies and programs’, International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 563–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., Gareis, K. and Brennan, R. T. (1999) ‘Fit as a mediator of the relationship between work hours and burnout’, Journal of Occupational Health of Psychology, 4, 307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M. R., Kicza, D. C. and Crane, N. (1987) ‘A note on the effectiveness of flextime as an organizational intervention’, Public Personnel Management, 16(3), 259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K. and Staines, L. G. (1990) ‘Flextime: a viable solution to work/family conflict?’, Journal of Family Issues, 11, 455–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkberg, M. (2000) Balancing Acts: Easing the Burdens and Improving the Options for Working Families. (Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. and Mesch, D. (1990) ‘The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 370–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deery, S. and Mahony, A. (1994) ‘Temporal flexibility: management strategies and employee preferences in the retail industry’, Journal of Industrial Relations, September, 332–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, R., Pierce, J. and Castenda, M. (1987) ‘Alternative work schedules: two field quasi-experiments’, Personnel Psychology, 40, 215–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezra, M. and Deckman, M. (1996) ‘Balancing work and family responsibilities: flextime and child care in the federal government’, Public Administration Review, 56(2), 174–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, C. (2001) ‘The temporal re-organization of employment and the household rhythm of work schedules’, American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Families and Work Institute (1993) The 1992 Study of the Changing Work Force. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, R. and Tausig, M. (2001) ‘Scheduling stress: family and health outcomes of shift work and schedule control’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1179–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. and Waldfogel, J. (1998) ‘The long-term consequences of non-standard work’, Monthly Labor Review, 121(5), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flexible Resources (2001) Profile of candidates seeking flexible work arrangements. May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, E. and Bond, J. T. (eds) (1998) The 1998 Business Work-Life Study: A Sourcebook. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. (1995) ‘Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive benefits’, Work and Occupations, 22(4), 380–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, L. (1996) ‘The economics of worktime length, adjusting and flexibility: contributions of three competing paradigms’, Review of Social Economy, Spring 1996, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, L. (2001) ‘Flexible work schedules: what are workers trading off to get them?’, Monthly Labor Review, 124(3), 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, J. (1998) ‘Employers warming up to flexible schedules’, Business Insurance, 32(24), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. (1999) ‘Timing of work over time’, The Economic Journal, 109(452), 37–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. and Barbera, K. (1997) ‘Toward an integration of alternative work’, Human Resource Planning, 20(2), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrick, E., Vanek, G. and Michlitsch, J. (1986) ‘Alternative work schedules, productivity, leave usage and employee attitudes: a field study’, Public Personnel Management, 15(2), 159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, K. (1999) ‘Finding balance’, Incentive, 173, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A., Ferris, M. and Weitzman, M. (2001) ‘Finding an extra day a week: positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family balance’, Family Relations, 50(1), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohl, L. (1996) ‘The effects of flexible work arrangements’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HR Focus (1998) ‘The work/life haves and have-nots’, 75(8), s6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1998) ‘Measuring time at work: are self-reports accurate?’, Monthly Labor Review, December, 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. and Provan, K. (1995) ‘The relationship between work/family benefits and earnings: a test of competing hypotheses’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(4), 571–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kate, Nancy Ten (1998) ‘Two careers, one marriage’, American Demographics, 20(4), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. and Campagna, A. (1981) ‘Effects of flexitime on employee attendance and performance: a field experiment’, Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 729–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, R. (1986) ‘Alternative work schedules and productivity: a review of the evidence’, National Productivity Review, 5(2), 150–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E., Barber, A. and Winters, D. (1999) ‘Using flexible schedules in the managerial world’, Human Resource Management, 38(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausz, M. and Freibach, N. (1983) ‘Effects of flexible working time for employed women upon satisfaction, strains and absenteeism’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 2, 155–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausz, M. and Hermann, E. (1991) ‘Who is afraid of flexitime? Correlates of personal choice of flexitime schedules’, Applied Psychology, 40(3), 315–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausz, M., Sagie, A. and Bidermann, Y. (2000) ‘Actual and preferred work schedules and scheduling control as determinants of job-related attitudes’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kush, K. and Stroh, L. (1994) ‘Flextime: the imaginary innovation’, Business Horizons, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, B. (1999) ‘Flexibility may enhance job performance’, HRMagazine, 44(9), 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrate, E. (2002) ‘Working mothers in a double bind wednesday’, Economic Policy Institute, Washington DC, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B. and Liro, J. R. (1987) ‘Absenteeism and flexible work schedules’, Public Personnel Management, 16, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShulskis, E. (1997) ‘Work and family benefits are increasingly popular’, HRMagazine, 42(7), 26–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. S., Mukerjee, S. and Sestero, A. (2001) ‘Work-family benefits: which ones maximize profits?’, Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(1), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, R. L. and Curtis, T. D. (1985) ‘The economics of flexitime’, Journal of Behavioral Economics, Summer, 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. (1995) ‘Job, family and gender: determinants of nonstandard work schedules among employed americans in 1991’, Demography, 32(4), 577–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. (1999) ‘Toward a 24-hour economy’, Science, 284, 1778–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. (1989) ‘The benefits of flextime: real or imagined?’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10(4), 369–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. and Flanagan, M. (1985) ‘The effect of flextime on absenteeism and turnover for male and female employees’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26(2), 206–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D., Anthony, W. and Gustafson, D. (1985) ‘Employees may love flexibility, but what does it do to the organization’s productivity?’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 272–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, C. (1994) ‘What is your flexibility factor?’, Management Review, January, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, T. and Lankau, M. (1997) ‘Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(4), 377–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1994) ‘Worktime in a contemporary context: amending the FLSA’, Chicago- Kent Law, 70(1), 157–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D., Hermsen, J. and Billings, J. (2002) ‘Factors associated with having flextime: a focus on married workers’, Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, E., Clifton, T. and Kruse, D. (1996) ‘Flexible work hours and productivity: some evidence from the pharmaceutical industry, Industrial Relations, 35(1), 123–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, K., Faragher, B. and Cooper, C. (2001) ‘Well-being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor (1999) Futurework – Trends and Challenges for Work in the 21st Century. Part 3: Work And Family: Flexibility On The Job. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (1998) ‘Workers on flexible and shift schedules in 1997’, USDL 98–119, BLS News, March 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2002) ‘Workers on flexible and shift schedules in 2001’, USDL 02–225, BLS News, April 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Lonnie Golden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golden, L. (2003). Flexible Work Schedules and Their Impact on Employees. In: Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S., Koslowsky, M. (eds) Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288829_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics