Skip to main content

Abstract

Employees can engage in a wide spectrum of misbehaviour in organizations. Such counterproductivity costs employers billions of dollars annually worldwide (Ones, 2002). The extent of actual, psychological and societal costs to organizations can be better understood when one considers the multitude of different ways employees can misbehave. Geddes and Baron (1997) found that 69 per cent of managers reported having experienced verbal aggression. Wimbush and Dalton (1997) used multiple methods and samples to estimate the base rate for employee theft, and found ‘Depending on the level one ascribes to nontrivial employee theft, .. . [the different techniques of estimating employee theft] . . . converge on theft rates over 50 per cent’ (p. 756). It is estimated that substance abuse costs the United States alone more than $135 billion each year (DeCresce et al., 1990). Harwood, Fountain and Livermore (1992) estimated that in the United States economy $82 billion in lost potential productivity could be attributed to alcohol and drug abuse in 1992 ($67.7 billion and $14.2 billion, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. and Heggestad, E. D. (1997) ‘Intelligence, personality, and interest: evidence for overlapping traits’, Psychological Bulletin, 121(2), 219–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C. (1998) ‘Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R. and Mount, M. K. (1991) ‘The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. and Judge, T. A. (2001) ‘Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: what do we know and where do we go next?’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1997) ‘Identity, self-concept, and self-esteem: the self lost and found’, in R. Hogan, J. Johnson and S. Briggs (eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 681–711). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J. and Robinson, S. L. (2000) ‘Development of a measure of workplace deviance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1995) ‘A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description’, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, A. and Heatherly, L. (2001) ‘Predictors of employee deviance: the relationship between bad attitudes and bad behavior’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(3), 405–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D. and Motowidlo, S. J. (2001) ‘Personality predictors of citizenship performance’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P. (1990) ‘The role of theory in Industrial and organizational psychology’, in M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 39–73). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. Y. and Spector, P. E. (1992) ‘Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: an exploratory study’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J. J. and Viswesvaran, C. (2000) ‘The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: a meta-analysis’, Personality and Individual Differences, 29(2), 265–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1992) ‘Four ways five factors are basic’, Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, M. J. and Sackett, P. R. (in press) ‘Personality and counterproductive workplace behavior’, in M. Barrick and A. M. Ryan (eds), Personality and Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J. (1994) ‘On emotion, mood, and related affective constructs’, in P. Ekman and R. J. Davidson (eds), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (pp. 51–5). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCresce, R., Mazura, A., Lifshitz, M. and Tilson, J. (1990) Drug Testing in the Workplace. Chicago: American Society of Clinical Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Larsen, R. J. and Emmons, R. A. (1984) ‘Person * Situation interactions: choice of situations and congruence response models’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 580–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S. and Emmons, R. A. (1985) ‘Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1253–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990) ‘Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model’, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1997) ‘Higher order factors of the Big Five’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. and Takemoto-Chock, M. K. (1981) ‘Factors in the natural language of personality: re-analysis and comparison of six major studies’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C. and Shaw, J. D. (1998) ‘Positive affectivity and negative outcomes: the role of tenure and job satisfaction’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 950–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1994) ‘Mood, emotions, and traits’, in P. Ekman and R. J. Davidson (eds), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (pp. 56–8). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. and Diener, E. (1986) ‘An interactional approach to the study of personality and emotion’, Journal of Personality, 54(2), 371–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, Robert, A., Diener, Ed and Larsen, Randy, J. (1985) ‘Choice of situations and congruence models of interactionism’, Personality and Individual Differences, 6(6), 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1991) ‘Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, or 3-criteria for a taxonomic paradigm’, Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Spector, F. S. and Miles, D. (2001) ‘Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1930) Civilization and its Discontents. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (1997) The Personality Puzzle. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, D. H. and Baron, R. A. (1997) ‘Workplace aggression as a consequence of negative performance feedback’, unpublished manuscript, Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1989) ‘Mood and absence’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 317–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1991) ‘State or trait: effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. and Bettenhausen, K. (1990) ‘Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: a group-level analysis in a service context’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990) ‘An alternative “description of personality”: the big five factor structure’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993) ‘The structure of phenotypic personality traits’, American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, H. H. (1994) ‘Parsing the emotional domain from a developmental perspective’, in P. Ekman and R. J. Davidson (eds), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (pp. 68–73). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruys, M. L. (1999) ‘The dimensionality of deviant employee performance in the workplace’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakstian, A. R., Farrell, S. and Tweed, R. G. (2002) ‘The assessment of counterproductive tendencies by means of the California Psychological Inventory’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, H., Fountain, D. and Livermore, G. (1992) The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992. National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J. and Hogan, R. (1989) ‘How to measure employee reliability’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. and Hogan, J. (1992) Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., Hogan, R. and Busch, C. (1984) ‘How to measure service orientation’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 167–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. and Clark, J. P. (1983) Theft By Employees. Lexington, MA: DC Heath & Company/Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992) ‘The “Big Five” personality variables – construct confusion: description versus prediction’, Human Performance, 5, 139–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1998) ‘Personality at work: issues and evidence’, in M. Hakel (ed.), Beyond Multiple Choice: Evaluating Alternatives to Traditional Testing for Selection (pp. 131–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. and Ones, D. S. (2001) ‘The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology’, in N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. Sinangil and C. Viswesvaran (eds) Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 233–77). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. and Oswald, F. (2000) ‘Personnel selection: looking toward the future – remembering the past’, Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D. and McCloy, R. A. (1990) ‘Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities’ (monograph), Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. T. (1996) ‘Generic work behavior: an investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance’, Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E. and Schmidt, F. L. (1990) Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1984) ‘Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition’, in R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (eds), Handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, E. (1957) ‘Normal and pathological moods: their nature and functions’, in R. S. Eisler, A. F. Freud, H. Hartman and E. Kris (eds), The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, Vol. 12 (pp. 73–113). New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jockin, V., Arvey, R. D. and McGue, M. (2001) ‘Perceived victimization moderates self-reports of workplace aggression and conflict’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1262–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1990a) ‘The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires’, in L. A. Pervin (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1990b) ‘The search for basic dimensions of personality’, in P. McReynods, J. C. Rosen and G. J. Chelune (eds), Advances in Psychological Assessment (pp. 1–37). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Angleitner, A. and Ostendorf, F. (1988) ‘The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research’, European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J. (1988) ‘Expertise and decision under uncertainty: performance and process’, in M. T. Chi, R. Glaser and M. J. Farr (eds), The Nature of Expertise (pp. 209–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1994) ‘Distinctions among emotions, moods, and temperamental qualities’, in P. Ekman and R. J. Davidson (eds), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (pp. 74–8). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R. (1990) ‘Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology’, in M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 75–170). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. K., Loughlin, C., Barling, J. and Nault, A. (2002) ‘Self-reported counterproductive behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors: separate but related constructs’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F. and Hastie, R. (1997) ‘Mental representations of persons and personality’, in R. Hogan, J. Johnson and S. Briggs (eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 712–36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1977) The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowsky, M., Sagie, A., Krausz, M. and Singer, A. D. (1997) ‘Correlates of employee lateness: some theoretical considerations’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, A. M. and Terry, P. C. (2000) ‘The nature of mood: development of a conceptual model with a focus on depression’, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 12, 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. (1994) ‘The stable and unstable in emotion’, in P. Ekman and R. J. Davidson (eds), The nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (pp. 79–85). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. and Allen, N. J. (2002) ‘Organizational citizenship behavior deviance: the role of affect and cognitions’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, W. E. K. and Simpson, D. D. (1992) ‘Employee substance use and on the job behaviors’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 309–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B., Schuler, H., Quell, P. and Hümpfner, G. (2002) ‘Measuring counter-productivity: development and initial validation of a German self-report’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J. and Douglas, S. C. (2002) ‘Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: a causal reasoning perspective’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. Jr (1987) ‘Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. Jr (1997) ‘Personality trait structure as a human universal’, American Psychologist, 52, 509–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A. and Frei, R. L. (1994) ‘Validity of customer service measures in personnel selection: a meta-analysis’, paper presented at the ninth annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, R. A. and Paajanen, G. (1994) PDI Customer Service Inventory Manual. Minneapolis, MN: PDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I. (1997) ‘Internal inhibitions and controls’, in R. Hogan, J. Johnson and S. Briggs (eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 581–614). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, D. E., Borman, W. E., Spector, P. E. and Fox, S. (2002) ‘Building an integrative model of extra role work behaviors: a comparison of counterproductive work behavior with organizational citizenship behavior’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W. N. (1989) Mood: The Frame of Mind. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1963) ‘Personality measurement, faking, and detection: an assessment method for use in personnel selection’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 225–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S. (1993) ‘The construct validity of integrity tests’, unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa City, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S. (2002) Introduction to the Special Issue on Counterproductive Behaviors at Work, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S. and Viswesvaran, C. (1996) ‘Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 209–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S. and Viswesvaran, C. (1998) ‘Integrity testing in organizations’, in R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly and J. M. Collins (eds), Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations: Vol. 2. Nonviolent Behaviors in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S. and Viswesvaran, C. (2001a) ‘Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S. and Viswesvaran, C. (2001b) ‘Personality at work: criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection’, in B. Roberts and R. T. Hogan (eds), Applied Personality Psychology, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. and Reiss, A. D. (1996) ‘Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: the red herring’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. and Schmidt, F. L. (1993) ‘Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology (Monograph), 78, 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. and Schmidt, F. L. (in press) ‘Personality and absenteeism: a meta-analysis of integrity tests’, European Journal of Personality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. and Ryan, K. (1995) ‘A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior’, Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, F. and Angleitner, A. (1994) ‘The five-factor taxonomy: robust dimensions of personality description’, Psychologica Belgica, 34(4), 175–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M. and Spector, P. (2002) ‘Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: do bigger egos mean bigger problems?’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 126–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. and Bennett, R. J. (1995) ‘A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: a multidimensional scaling study’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H. and Knafo, A. (2002) ‘The Big Five personality factors and personal values’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. (2002) ‘The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. and DeVore, C. (2001) ‘Counterproductive behaviors at work’, in N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. Sinangil and C. Viswesvaran (eds) Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 145–64). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. and Wanek, J. E. (1996) ‘New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection’, Personnel Psychology, 49, 787–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Burris, L. R. and Callahan, C. (1989) ‘Integrity testing for personnel selection: an update’, Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. F. (1997) ‘The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. F. (2002) ‘The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors’, Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. I. and Fraser, S. L. (1993) Development and Validation of the Corporate Social Style Inventory: A Measure of Customer Service Skills (Technical Report No. 93–108). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. and Goldberg, L. R. (1998) ‘What is beyond the Big Five?’, Journal of Personality, 66, 495–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. and Ostendorf, F. (1999) ‘Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: a cross-language replication’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 613–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R. and Weitz, B. (1982) ‘The SOCO scale measure of the customer orientation of salespeople’, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D. S. (1997) ‘Validity of integrity tests for predicting drug and alcohol abuse: a meta-analysis’, in W. J. Bukoski (ed.), Meta-Analysis of Drug Abuse Prevention Programs (pp. 69–95). Rockville, MD: NIDA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P. and Folger, R. (1997) ‘Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971) Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P. and Ones, D. S. (2002) ‘Personality and happiness: a national level analysis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 767–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (1996) The Origin of Everyday Moods: Managing Energy, Tension, and Stress. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (2000) ‘Negative emotion in the workplace: employee jealousy and envy’, International Journal of Stress Management, 7(3), 161–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C. (1993) ‘Modeling job performance: is there a general factor?’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D. S. (2000a) ‘Measurement error in “Big Five Factors” of personality assessment: reliability generalization across studies and measures’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D. S. (2000b) ‘Perspectives on models of job performance’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L. and Ones, D. S. (1996) ‘Modeling job performance: is there a general factor?’, poster presented at the eleventh annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1988) ‘Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1020–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2000) Mood and Temperament. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1929) Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, J. C. and Dalton, D. R. (1997) ‘Base rate for employee theft: convergence of multiple methods’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 756–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Deniz S. Ones and Chockalingam Viswesvaran

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C. (2003). The Big-5 Personality and Counterproductive Behaviours. In: Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S., Koslowsky, M. (eds) Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288829_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics