Abstract
In May 1865, Trollopé s The Belton Estate launched the Fortnightly Review. In the first part of this chapter, I explore the cultural formation of the Fortnightly and consider the nature of the magazine’s liberalism in relation to the network of male writers which defined it. I believe that, for all its radical policies, there is an absence of the female voice in its contents because of what might be termed its Positivist political stance. The Belton Estate (serialized between May 1865 and January 1866) was the second Trollope novel to launch a periodical, but rather than defining the magazine in the way Framley Parsonage seemed to do in the Cornhill, it sits oddly in the Fortnightly under its first editor, G.H. Lewes. The tensions which I think The Belton Estate generates as a bid for women readers are directly related to its context in a hybrid periodical — not quite a traditional review, not quite a popular monthly. In the second part of the chapter, I discuss the question of signature in the context of anxiety over creating what has been called a star system of criticism. Although star journalism had not yet been fully introduced in the mid-1860s, it can be argued that the rise of individual personalities within a burgeoning mass culture had already begun. The Fortnightly was part of the foundation for a middle-class culture which, as the century moved on, became hooked on personality and celebrity. The anonymity debate, then, can be examined not simply for its effect on honesty in writing but also for its contribution to a culture of celebrity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Prospectus, Fortnightly Review 1 (May 15, 1865), inside front cover.
Charles Morgan, The House of Macmillan (1843–1943) (London: Macmillan, 1943), 50.
Rosemary Ashton, G.H. Lewes: A Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 101.
Auguste Comte, A General View of Positivism, J.H. Bridges, trans. (London: Trubner, 1865), 225–6.
See the following articles on Comte: ‘Positive Philosophy of Comte’, Edinburgh Review 127 (April 1868), 303–57
William Whewell, ‘Comte and Positivism’, Macmillan’s Magazine 13 (March 1866), 353–62
William Whewell, ‘Positivism’, North British Review 49 (September 1868), 209–56
W.H. Freemantle, ‘M. Auguste Comte and His Disciples on International Policy’, Contemporary Review 3 (December 1866), 477–98
Brooke F. Westcott, ‘Comte on the Philosophy of the History of Christianity’, Contemporary Review 3 (December 1867), 399–421
Brooke F. Westcott, ‘Aspects of Positivism in Relation to Christianity’, Contemporary Review 8 (July 1868), 371–86.
Editor [G.H. Lewes], ‘Comte and Mill’, Fortnightly Review 6 (1 October 1866), 385–406.
Lewes’s ‘Auguste Comte’, Fortnightly Review 3 (1 January 1866), 385–410 and his review of Bridges’s General View in the Fortnightly Review 1 (1 June 1865), 250–1, in which he accepts Comte’s early philosophy but not the later doctrinal religion. As I indicate later in this chapter, another way to regard the Fortnightlÿ s promotion of Positivism is to consider the periodical’s relation to radical politics.
G.H. Lewes, Biographical History of Philosophy 2 (2 vols; London: John W. Parker, 1857), 662.
Gordon Haight, ed., The George Eliot Letters 4 (9 vols; London: Oxford University Press; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1956), 496.
See Christopher Kent, ‘Higher Journalism and the Promotion of Comtism’, Victorian Periodicals Review 25:2 (Summer 1992), 51–6.
Richard Dellamora, Masculine Desire: The Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990), chapter 1.
Christopher Kent, Brains and Numbers: Elitism, Comtism, and Democracy in Mid-Victorian England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978), 89.
Richard Congreve, The Propagation of the Religion of Humanity: A Sermon Preached at South Fields, Wandsworth (London: John Chapman, 1860), 13.
E.S. Beesly, J.H. Bridges, Richard Congreve, Religion of Humanity, Republic of the West: Papers on the War between France and Germany (London: Edward Truelove, 1870).
Editor [G.H. Lewes], ‘Variâ’ , Fortnightly Review 3 (1 January 1866), 512.
John Dennis, review of John Malcolm Ludlow, Woman’s Work in the Church in Fortnightly Review1 (1 June 1865), 252.
See the following reviews in the Fortnightly: John Dennis’s review of Mary Braddon, Only a Clod in 1 (1 July 1865), 511–12
A.R. Vardy’s review of Amelia B. Edwards, Half a Million of Money in 3 (15 January 1866), 654–5
Robert Buchanan’s review of Sarah Tytler’s Citoyenne Jacqueline: A Woman’s Lot in the Great French Revolution in 3 (1 February 1866), 781–2
John Dennis’s review of Elizabeth Cooper’s Life and Letters of Lady Arabella Stuart in 4 (15 March 1865), 383.
Mary Lyndon Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in England, 1850–1895 (London: I.B. Tauris, 1989), 50–1. See chapter 2 on the Married Women’s Property Act of 1870.
Editor [Lewes], ‘Criticism in Relation to Novels’, Fortnightly Review 3 (15 December 1865), 353.
Editor [G.H. Lewes], ‘The Principles of Success in Literature: The Principle of Vision’, Fortnightly Review 1 (1June 1865), 187.
Raymond Williams, The Country and the City (1973; London: Hogarth Press, 1985), 174–5.
Frederic Harrison, ‘The Limits of Political Economy’, Fortnightly Review 1 (15 June 1865), 366–7.
[F.W. Newman,] ‘Capacities of Women’, Westminster Review 56 n.s. (October 1865), 359.
[Helen Taylor,] ‘The Ladies’ Petition’, Westminster Review 31 n.s. (January 1867), 66
Ann P. Robson and John M. Robson, eds, Sexual Equality: Writings by John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill and Helen Taylor (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994), 219.
Michael Slater, ‘The Bachelor’s Pocket Book for 1851’, Tennessee Studies in Literature (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1984), 128–40.
Laurel Brake, ‘“The Trepidation of the Spheres”: The Serial and the Book in the 19th Century’, in Michael Harris and Robin Myers, eds, Serials and Their Readers (Winchester: St. Paul’s Bibliographies, 1993), 91.
George Saintsbury, A History of Nineteenth Century Literature (London: Macmillan, 1896), 450.
See Matthew Arnold, ‘Up to Easter’, Nineteenth Century 21 (May 1887), 638.
Editor [Lewes], ‘Causerie’, Fortnightly Review 4 (1 April 1866), 507.
Harriet Martineau, ‘Literary Lionism’, reprinted in Harriet Martineau’s Autobiography 1 (3 vols; London: Smith, Elder, 1877), 283.
Leo Lowenthal, Literature, Popular Culture and Society (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1961), 110.
Philip Collins, ‘The Popularity of Dickens’, Dickensian 70 (January 1974), 6.
Mary Poovey, Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 108. Poovey argues that Dickens came to represent a type of ‘national character’ which ‘implicitly constructed the middle-class male as the norm by obliterating class (and gender) differences’, 110.
Philip Collins, Reading Aloud: A Victorian Metier (Lincoln, UK: Tennyson Society, 1972), 7. Collins’s account of the popularity of public readings, lectures, and recitals informs the next few paragraphs. See also
Philip Collins, ed., Charles Dickens: The Public Readings (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), xvii-xxx.
Joel Wiener, ‘Edmund Yates: The Gossip as Editor’, in Joel Wiener, ed., Innovators and Preachers: The Role of Editor in Victorian England (Westport, CT, and London: Greenwood Press, 1985), 269.
N. John Hall gives the details of Nina Balatka’s publishing history in Trollope: A Biography (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), 283–9.
See Judith Knelman, ‘Trollope’s Experiments with Anonymity’, Victorian Periodicals Review 14:1 (Spring 1981), 21–4.
Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), 75.
Edward Bishop, ‘Re: Covering Modernism: Format and Function in the Little Magazines,’ in Ian Willison, Warwick Gould, and Warren Chernaik, eds, Modernist Writers and the Marketplace (Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Press, 1996), 287–319.
Copyright information
© 2000 Mark W. Turner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, M.W. (2000). Launching a Hybrid: The Belton Estate in the Fortnightly Review. In: Trollope and the Magazines. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288546_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288546_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40628-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28854-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)