Skip to main content

Launching a Hybrid: The Belton Estate in the Fortnightly Review

  • Chapter
Trollope and the Magazines
  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

In May 1865, Trollopé s The Belton Estate launched the Fortnightly Review. In the first part of this chapter, I explore the cultural formation of the Fortnightly and consider the nature of the magazine’s liberalism in relation to the network of male writers which defined it. I believe that, for all its radical policies, there is an absence of the female voice in its contents because of what might be termed its Positivist political stance. The Belton Estate (serialized between May 1865 and January 1866) was the second Trollope novel to launch a periodical, but rather than defining the magazine in the way Framley Parsonage seemed to do in the Cornhill, it sits oddly in the Fortnightly under its first editor, G.H. Lewes. The tensions which I think The Belton Estate generates as a bid for women readers are directly related to its context in a hybrid periodical — not quite a traditional review, not quite a popular monthly. In the second part of the chapter, I discuss the question of signature in the context of anxiety over creating what has been called a star system of criticism. Although star journalism had not yet been fully introduced in the mid-1860s, it can be argued that the rise of individual personalities within a burgeoning mass culture had already begun. The Fortnightly was part of the foundation for a middle-class culture which, as the century moved on, became hooked on personality and celebrity. The anonymity debate, then, can be examined not simply for its effect on honesty in writing but also for its contribution to a culture of celebrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Prospectus, Fortnightly Review 1 (May 15, 1865), inside front cover.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles Morgan, The House of Macmillan (1843–1943) (London: Macmillan, 1943), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosemary Ashton, G.H. Lewes: A Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Auguste Comte, A General View of Positivism, J.H. Bridges, trans. (London: Trubner, 1865), 225–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See the following articles on Comte: ‘Positive Philosophy of Comte’, Edinburgh Review 127 (April 1868), 303–57

    Google Scholar 

  6. William Whewell, ‘Comte and Positivism’, Macmillan’s Magazine 13 (March 1866), 353–62

    Google Scholar 

  7. William Whewell, ‘Positivism’, North British Review 49 (September 1868), 209–56

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.H. Freemantle, ‘M. Auguste Comte and His Disciples on International Policy’, Contemporary Review 3 (December 1866), 477–98

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooke F. Westcott, ‘Comte on the Philosophy of the History of Christianity’, Contemporary Review 3 (December 1867), 399–421

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brooke F. Westcott, ‘Aspects of Positivism in Relation to Christianity’, Contemporary Review 8 (July 1868), 371–86.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Editor [G.H. Lewes], ‘Comte and Mill’, Fortnightly Review 6 (1 October 1866), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewes’s ‘Auguste Comte’, Fortnightly Review 3 (1 January 1866), 385–410 and his review of Bridges’s General View in the Fortnightly Review 1 (1 June 1865), 250–1, in which he accepts Comte’s early philosophy but not the later doctrinal religion. As I indicate later in this chapter, another way to regard the Fortnightlÿ s promotion of Positivism is to consider the periodical’s relation to radical politics.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.H. Lewes, Biographical History of Philosophy 2 (2 vols; London: John W. Parker, 1857), 662.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon Haight, ed., The George Eliot Letters 4 (9 vols; London: Oxford University Press; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1956), 496.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Christopher Kent, ‘Higher Journalism and the Promotion of Comtism’, Victorian Periodicals Review 25:2 (Summer 1992), 51–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard Dellamora, Masculine Desire: The Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990), chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christopher Kent, Brains and Numbers: Elitism, Comtism, and Democracy in Mid-Victorian England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richard Congreve, The Propagation of the Religion of Humanity: A Sermon Preached at South Fields, Wandsworth (London: John Chapman, 1860), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.S. Beesly, J.H. Bridges, Richard Congreve, Religion of Humanity, Republic of the West: Papers on the War between France and Germany (London: Edward Truelove, 1870).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Editor [G.H. Lewes], ‘Variâ’ , Fortnightly Review 3 (1 January 1866), 512.

    Google Scholar 

  21. John Dennis, review of John Malcolm Ludlow, Woman’s Work in the Church in Fortnightly Review1 (1 June 1865), 252.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See the following reviews in the Fortnightly: John Dennis’s review of Mary Braddon, Only a Clod in 1 (1 July 1865), 511–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.R. Vardy’s review of Amelia B. Edwards, Half a Million of Money in 3 (15 January 1866), 654–5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robert Buchanan’s review of Sarah Tytler’s Citoyenne Jacqueline: A Woman’s Lot in the Great French Revolution in 3 (1 February 1866), 781–2

    Google Scholar 

  25. John Dennis’s review of Elizabeth Cooper’s Life and Letters of Lady Arabella Stuart in 4 (15 March 1865), 383.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mary Lyndon Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in England, 1850–1895 (London: I.B. Tauris, 1989), 50–1. See chapter 2 on the Married Women’s Property Act of 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Editor [Lewes], ‘Criticism in Relation to Novels’, Fortnightly Review 3 (15 December 1865), 353.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Editor [G.H. Lewes], ‘The Principles of Success in Literature: The Principle of Vision’, Fortnightly Review 1 (1June 1865), 187.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raymond Williams, The Country and the City (1973; London: Hogarth Press, 1985), 174–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frederic Harrison, ‘The Limits of Political Economy’, Fortnightly Review 1 (15 June 1865), 366–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. [F.W. Newman,] ‘Capacities of Women’, Westminster Review 56 n.s. (October 1865), 359.

    Google Scholar 

  32. [Helen Taylor,] ‘The Ladies’ Petition’, Westminster Review 31 n.s. (January 1867), 66

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ann P. Robson and John M. Robson, eds, Sexual Equality: Writings by John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill and Helen Taylor (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994), 219.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Michael Slater, ‘The Bachelor’s Pocket Book for 1851’, Tennessee Studies in Literature (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1984), 128–40.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Laurel Brake, ‘“The Trepidation of the Spheres”: The Serial and the Book in the 19th Century’, in Michael Harris and Robin Myers, eds, Serials and Their Readers (Winchester: St. Paul’s Bibliographies, 1993), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  36. George Saintsbury, A History of Nineteenth Century Literature (London: Macmillan, 1896), 450.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Matthew Arnold, ‘Up to Easter’, Nineteenth Century 21 (May 1887), 638.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Editor [Lewes], ‘Causerie’, Fortnightly Review 4 (1 April 1866), 507.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Harriet Martineau, ‘Literary Lionism’, reprinted in Harriet Martineau’s Autobiography 1 (3 vols; London: Smith, Elder, 1877), 283.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Leo Lowenthal, Literature, Popular Culture and Society (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1961), 110.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Philip Collins, ‘The Popularity of Dickens’, Dickensian 70 (January 1974), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mary Poovey, Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 108. Poovey argues that Dickens came to represent a type of ‘national character’ which ‘implicitly constructed the middle-class male as the norm by obliterating class (and gender) differences’, 110.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Philip Collins, Reading Aloud: A Victorian Metier (Lincoln, UK: Tennyson Society, 1972), 7. Collins’s account of the popularity of public readings, lectures, and recitals informs the next few paragraphs. See also

    Google Scholar 

  44. Philip Collins, ed., Charles Dickens: The Public Readings (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), xvii-xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Joel Wiener, ‘Edmund Yates: The Gossip as Editor’, in Joel Wiener, ed., Innovators and Preachers: The Role of Editor in Victorian England (Westport, CT, and London: Greenwood Press, 1985), 269.

    Google Scholar 

  46. N. John Hall gives the details of Nina Balatka’s publishing history in Trollope: A Biography (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), 283–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. See Judith Knelman, ‘Trollope’s Experiments with Anonymity’, Victorian Periodicals Review 14:1 (Spring 1981), 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), 75.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Edward Bishop, ‘Re: Covering Modernism: Format and Function in the Little Magazines,’ in Ian Willison, Warwick Gould, and Warren Chernaik, eds, Modernist Writers and the Marketplace (Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Press, 1996), 287–319.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Mark W. Turner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, M.W. (2000). Launching a Hybrid: The Belton Estate in the Fortnightly Review. In: Trollope and the Magazines. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288546_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics