Abstract
Golem-tales often highlight the reflexive nature of the relation between creator and golem. If the creature is flawed, it is a reflection of the flaw in the creator: if the creature reveals itself to be monstrous, it is because the creator is essentially monstrous. The idea of monstrosity did not just limit itself to fabulous creatures, but, with the advent and establishment of the Industrial Revolution, with the 1789 Revolution in France, and with new explorations in science, monstrosity as a metaphor came to be interpreted and reinterpreted throughout the nineteenth century. At the centre of this metaphor was the subject of control — of industry, of labour, of capital, of the dissemination and understanding of new ideas. Control of these areas was as shifting and unsure as control of the golem figure in Goethe’s ‘Sorcerer’s Apprentice’. We have already demonstrated how Eliot reconstructed (or deconstructed) previous literary representations of Jewish assimilation; in her novels and short stories she realigned and restructured the pervasive metaphors of monstrosity and control that permeated nineteenth-century writing through further exploitation of the golem myth and kabbalistic ideas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mircea Eliade, Myths, Dreams and Mysteries, trans. Philip Mairet (London, 1960), p. 15.
Paul A. Cantor, Creature and Creator: Myth-making and English Romanticism (Cambridge, 1984), p. 105.
George Eliot, The Lifted Veil; Brother Jacob, ed. Helen Small (Oxford, 1999), p. 87.
Charles Dickens, Great Expectations, ed. Angus Calder (Harmondsworth, 1979), p. 337.
See Terry Eagleton, ‘Power and Knowledge in The Lifted Veil’ in George Eliot, ed. K. M. Newton (London and New York, 1991), pp. 53–64.
Nina Auerbach, Women and the Demon: the Life of a Victorian Myth (Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1982), p. 184.
See A. Reville, ProlegomPnes de l’Histoire des Religions (Paris, 1886), p. 163.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’, in Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, ed. Lewis R. Feuer (London, 1969), p. 54.
Sherwin, PMLA 96 (1981), p. 896.
Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George Eliot (New York, 1957), p. 80.
See Baldick, In Frankenstein’s Shadow (Oxford, 1987), pp. 148–52.
Copyright information
© 2002 Saleel Nurbhai and K. M. Newton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nurbhai, S., Newton, K.M. (2002). The Relationship between Creator and Creature. In: George Eliot, Judaism and the Novels. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288539_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288539_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42771-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28853-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)