Skip to main content

The Relationship between Creator and Creature

  • Chapter
George Eliot, Judaism and the Novels

Abstract

Golem-tales often highlight the reflexive nature of the relation between creator and golem. If the creature is flawed, it is a reflection of the flaw in the creator: if the creature reveals itself to be monstrous, it is because the creator is essentially monstrous. The idea of monstrosity did not just limit itself to fabulous creatures, but, with the advent and establishment of the Industrial Revolution, with the 1789 Revolution in France, and with new explorations in science, monstrosity as a metaphor came to be interpreted and reinterpreted throughout the nineteenth century. At the centre of this metaphor was the subject of control — of industry, of labour, of capital, of the dissemination and understanding of new ideas. Control of these areas was as shifting and unsure as control of the golem figure in Goethe’s ‘Sorcerer’s Apprentice’. We have already demonstrated how Eliot reconstructed (or deconstructed) previous literary representations of Jewish assimilation; in her novels and short stories she realigned and restructured the pervasive metaphors of monstrosity and control that permeated nineteenth-century writing through further exploitation of the golem myth and kabbalistic ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mircea Eliade, Myths, Dreams and Mysteries, trans. Philip Mairet (London, 1960), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul A. Cantor, Creature and Creator: Myth-making and English Romanticism (Cambridge, 1984), p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  3. George Eliot, The Lifted Veil; Brother Jacob, ed. Helen Small (Oxford, 1999), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations, ed. Angus Calder (Harmondsworth, 1979), p. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Terry Eagleton, ‘Power and Knowledge in The Lifted Veil’ in George Eliot, ed. K. M. Newton (London and New York, 1991), pp. 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nina Auerbach, Women and the Demon: the Life of a Victorian Myth (Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1982), p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See A. Reville, ProlegomPnes de l’Histoire des Religions (Paris, 1886), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’, in Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, ed. Lewis R. Feuer (London, 1969), p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sherwin, PMLA 96 (1981), p. 896.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George Eliot (New York, 1957), p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Baldick, In Frankenstein’s Shadow (Oxford, 1987), pp. 148–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 Saleel Nurbhai and K. M. Newton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nurbhai, S., Newton, K.M. (2002). The Relationship between Creator and Creature. In: George Eliot, Judaism and the Novels. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288539_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics