Abstract
The purpose of this study of Labotsibeni Gwamile LaMdluli is to examine human agency in historical processes and to demonstrate how one individual helped shape and forge a new collective consciousness. This is an inquiry into the dynamics of how LaMadluli initiated, moulded and coordinated change in Swaziland.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Traditional practice among the Swazi allows married women to retain (for public use) their paternal surnames. This is consistent with conventional references to males in most societies in the world. Scholarly works often identify authors through use of surname. In following this practice, LaMdluli will be used to identify the subject of discussion. This is a departure from historical works on Swaziland that refer to her by her first name, Labotsibeni, or Gwamile. This was appropriate before gender studies and its corresponding consciousness became a staple in academic work.
B. A. Marwick, The Swazi (London: Frank Cass, 1966) p. 262; see also H. Kuper, An African Aristocracy: Rank Among the Swazi (London: International Africa Institute, 1947) p. 55.
H. Kuper, The Uniform of Colour (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 1947) p. 101.
Christopher P. Youé, Robert Thorne Coryndon: Proconsular Imperialism in Southern and Eastern Africa, 1897–1925 (London: Colin Smythe, 1986) p. 52.
A. M. Kanduza, ‘Monarchy, Peasant Differentiation and Politics of Production in Swaziland, 1941–1972’. OSSREA Research Report, 1993.
T. T. Ginindza and H. Kuper, ‘The Power Behind the Swazi Monarchy: The Indlovukazi Labotsibeni Mdluli’, Part I and Part II, Dzadze, vol. I (1987).
H. Kuper, Sobhuza II (London: Duckworth, 1978). Re-evaluations of Cecil Rhodes include: John E. Flint, Cecil Rhodes (London: Hutchinson, 1974); I. R. Phimister, ‘Rhodes, Rhodesia and the Rand’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 2 (1974); C. Newbury, ‘Out of the Pit: the Capital accumulation of Cecil Rhodes’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 10 (1981).
See for example, a special issue of the Journal of Southern African Studies, 21, 4 (1995).
See for example, C. P. Potholm, ‘The Ngwenyama of Swaziland: The Dynamics of Political Adaptation’ in R. LeMarchand (ed.), African Kingships in Perspective: Political Change and Modernisation in Monarchical Settings (London: Frank Cass, 1977); H. M. Jones, A Biographical Register of Swaziland to 1902 (Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press, 1993).
P. Bonner, Kings, Commoners and Concessionaires: The Evolution and Dissolution of the Nineteenth-Century Swazi State ( Johannesburg: Ravan Press, 1983); Leroy Vail and L. White, Power and the Praise Poem: Southern African Voices in History (London: James Currey, 1991) pp. 155–97.
Marwick, The Swazi, p. 263.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, pp. 3, 18–21.
S. Marks and R. Rathbone, ‘Introduction’, S. Marks and R. Rathbone (eds), Industrialisation and Social Change in South Africa (London: Longman, 1982).
A. M. Kanduza, ‘Ambiguities in Woman History: The Case of Swaziland’, Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 12, 1 (1996) 35–45.
Personal Communication. In an informal social setting one Inkhosikati (wife of a prince) stated that her husband represents a tradition laid by Mswati II’s mother and Labotsibeni which Sobhuza II followed faithfully. Thus, a section of Swazi aristocracy belong to the progressive camp.
Jones, Register, pp. 400–2.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, pp. 59, 129.
Ibid., p. 18.
Youé, Coryndon, pp. 52–3; Kuper, Sobhuza II, pp. 73–4.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 21.
M. Genge, ‘The Role of the AmaSwazi in the Destruction of the BaPedi State, 1876–1879’, unpublished paper, n.d.’. Genge is doing a PhD on the period of LaMdluli’s reign.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 18.
Ginindza and Kuper, ‘Power behind the Swazi Monarchy . . . ’
Kuper, Sobhuza II, pp. 18, 28.
Jones, Registrar, pp. 95–101.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 28.
Ibid., p. 30.
Although the King and the Queen Mother are co-rulers, their relations face creative tension in the early years of the King’s reign. A total breakdown in relations is rare but serious conflicts are inevitable, and it is in that situation that the Swazi say ‘two bulls cannot live in the same kraal’.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 31.
Kuper, African Aristocracy, p. 9; H. W. Macmillan, ‘Swaziland: Decolonisation and the Triumph of Tradition’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 23 (1985).
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 39.
Ibid., p. 40.
Jonathan Crush, The Struggle for Swazi Labour, 1890–1920 (Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s, 1987), p. 158.
Ibid., p. 157.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 42.
A. Pim, Report on the Financial and Economic Situation of Swaziland (London: HMSO 1932), p. 18.
Crush, Struggle, p. 159.
Crush, Struggle, pp. 159–60.
Vail and White, Praise Poem, p. 160.
SNA (Swaziland National Archives) RCS 478/13: Minutes of Meeting between Resident Commissioner and Chief Regent and Council, 26 Aug. 1913.
SNA, RCS 475/14: Queen Regent to Resident Commissioner, 16 June 1914.
SNA, RCS 126/15: Meeting of Resident Commissioner and Swazi Chiefs, 6 June 1915.
Crush, Struggle, p. 163.
Kanduza, ‘Monarchy’, p. 16.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 43.
J. S. M. Matsebula, A History of Swaziland (London: Longman, 1976) pp. 163–5.
Kuper, Sobhuza II, p. 110.
SNA, J61/02: Swazi Queen Sends Deputation to Commissioner for Native Affairs, 30 June 1902.
SNA, S.3: J. J. Ferreira to T. Shepstone, 21 Jan. 1890.
SNA, J50/1904: Report on Swaziland by Special Commissioner.
SNA, 45/07/1418: Resident Commissioner to High Commissioner, 22 Aug. 1907; High Commissioner to Resident Commissioner, 2 Sept. 1907. File RCS/178.12: Queen Regent to Resident Commissioner, 18 June 1914; 19 Aug. 1913.
There are probably more community primary and high schools in Swaziland than those built by the government. In rural areas, where about 80 per cent of the population lives, every chiefdom aspires to have its own school.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kanduza, A. (2001). ‘You Are Tearing My Skirt’ :Labotsibeni Gwamile LaMdluli. In: Youé, C., Stapleton, T. (eds) Agency and Action in Colonial Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288485_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288485_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41796-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28848-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)