Abstract
The theoretical benefits and limitations of a non-interest financial system bear a close resemblance to those of Weitzman’s (1983, 1984, 1985, 1987) proposal to replace flat-rate wages with profit- or revenue-sharing labour remuneration arrangements. He assumes monopolistically competitive firms and long-run full employment equilibrium, but ‘sticky’ wages and prices due to implicit contracts with `insider’ workers (e.g. 1984, p. 34ff). Wage contracts allocate labour efficiently in equilibrium but can yield prolonged stagflation following an aggregate demand shock (ibid., p. 42ff). By replacing wages with a profit-sharing system, Weitzman believes that the marginal cost of employing an extra worker to the firm will always be less than their marginal revenue product, even at full employment levels (ibid., pp. 85–7).1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Paul S. Mills and John R. Presley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mills, P.S., Presley, J.R. (1999). Modelling Profit-and-Loss Sharing. In: Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288478_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288478_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38895-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28847-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)