Abstract
In the winter of 1613–14, entitling themselves ‘the only true professors of the gospell’, two prominent Cheshire Puritans, John Bruen and John Ratcliffe, sponsored a campaign of spontaneous iconoclasm.2 While Bruen satirically claimed that he had long been called ‘Bishop Bruen’ and had ‘a visitation in purpose if God so please to give opportunity’, Ratcliffe was a substantial local brewer, twice mayor of Chester and a parliament man.3 Their servants smashed down seven stone crosses, three standing in parish churchyards, and another four in the highway. One ‘crossbreaker’ taunted the parishioners of Christleton that ‘their dagon was fallen’ and that since ‘crowes [crowbars] pulled down crosses’, ‘dawes [jackdaws] must sett them up againe’. The inhabitants threatened revenge if the magistracy failed to ‘use some course for the reprovinge of their insolences’. The iconoclasts refused to give evidence before the magistrates Sir John Savage and Bishop George Lloyd. One of them, the carpenter William Dale, scornfully argued that he would give sworn testimony only ‘if they could persuade him that the takeing of an oath were to the glory of God’. When further investigation was undertaken by justices Edward Dodd and Richard Brereton, mocking rhymes were spread abroad that ‘Dodd hath noe God, and Brereton is not God’s son’.
All suits which frequent this courte are brought hither, either by some particular person complaiyning, or els by the very vigilant eye of state
[Anonymous Treatise] ‘On the Jurisdiction of the Star Chamber’, c.16001
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For Bruen, see William Hinde, A Faithful Remonstrance of the Holy Life and Happy Death of John Bruen of Bruen Stapleford in the County of Chester, Esquire (1641 [Wing 2063]); R.C. Richardson, Puritanism in North-west England: A Regional Study of the Diocese of Chester to 1642 (Manchester, 1972), pp. 122–4;
Patrick Collinson, The Religion of Protestants: The Church in English Society, 1559–1625 (Oxford, 1982), pp. 167, 169; and BL MS Additional 70001, fol. 1. For Ratcliffe, see Richardson, Puritanism in North-west England, pp. 133, 141;
and D.M. Hirst, The Representatives of the People? Voters and Voting in Earlty Stuart England (Cambridge, 1975), p. 198.
PRO CHES 21/2, fols. 96, 100, 100v, 105. Cf. Peter Lake and Michael Questier, ‘Prisons, Priests and People’, in Nicholas Tyacke (ed.), England’s Long Reformation, 1500–1800 (1997), pp. 195–233.
For Jane Ratcliffe, see Peter Lake, ‘Feminine Piety and Personal Potency: The “Emancipation” of Mrs Jane Ratcliffe’, The Seventeenth Century 1 (1986), 143–65;
for Henry Hardware, see Patrick Collinson, The Birthpangs of Protestant England: Religious and Cultural Change in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Basingstoke, 1988), pp. 54–5, 101, 154.
Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Mythology’, AJLH 5 (1961), 1–11; Sharpe, The Personal Rule, pp. 665–6.
Paul Slack, ‘Religious Protest and Urban Authority: The Case of Henry Sherfield, Iconoclast, 1633’, in Derek Baker (ed.), Schism, Heresy and Religious Protest (SCH 9, Cambridge, 1972), pp. 295–302;
Paul Slack, ‘The Public Conscience of Henry Sherfield’, in J.S. Morrill, Paul Slack and Daniel Woolf (eds), Public Duty and Private Conscience: Essays Presented to Gerald Aylmer (Oxford, 1993), pp. 151–71; Sharpe, The Personal Rule, pp. 345–48.
Maragaret Aston, England’s Iconoclasts, Volume II: Laws Against Images (Oxford, 1988), pp. 220–342;
Margaret Aston, ‘Puritans and Iconoclasm, 1560–1660’, in Christopher Durston and Jacqueline Eales (eds), The Culture of English Puritanism, 1560–1700 (Basingstoke, 1996), pp. 92–121. Cf. chapter 7 below.
Joan R. Kent, ‘“Folk Justice” and Royal Justice in Early Seventeenth-Century England: A “Charivari” in the Midlands’, MH 8 (1983), 70–85;
Martin Ingram, ‘Ridings, Rough Music and the “Reform of Popular Culture” in Early Modern England’, P&P 105 (1984), 79–113.
Steve Hindle, ‘Custom, Festival and Protest in Early Modern England: The Little Budworth Wakes, St Peter’s Day, 1596’, Rural History 6 (1995), 155–78.
Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants and Their Counsel, 1596–1641’, in J.H. Baker (ed.), Legal Records and the Historian (1978), p. 9.
G.R. Elton (ed.), The Tudor Constitution: Documents and Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1982), pp. 163–87;
J.P. Kenyon (ed.), The Stuart Constitution: Documents and Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1986), pp. 104–10;
and J.A. Guy, The Court of Star Chamber and its Records to the Reign of Elizabeth I (1985).
Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Due Process and Slow Process in the Late Elizabethan and Early Stuart Star Chamber’, AJLH 6 (1962), 224.
J.A. Guy, The Cardinal’s Court: The Impact of Thomas Wolsey in Star Chamber (Hassocks, 1977), pp. 15, 23–6, 51;
D.E. Hoak, The King’s Council in the Reign of Edward VI (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 222–8, 342–3; Guy, The Court of Star Chamber, p. 9;
E. Skelton, ‘The Court of Star Chamber in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth’ (unpublished University of London MA thesis, 1931), I, pp. 194–5, 196–7; Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, pp. 8–9; and Barnes, ‘Due Process & Slow Process’, 330.
Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 17; Barnes, ‘Due Process & Slow Process’, 335; Henry E.I. Phillips, ‘The Last Years of the Court of Star Chamber, 1630–41’, TRHS 4th ser. 21 (1938), 111; Guy, The Court of Star Chamber, p. 65.
Cf. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 10; Thomas G. Barnes (ed.), List and Index to the Proceedings in Star Chamber for the Reign of James I (1603–25) in the Public Record Office, London, Class STAC 8 (3 vols, Chicago, 1975), III, 11–14, 36–9; Tawney, The Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century, p. 397.
S.J. Stevenson, ‘The Rise of Suicide Verdicts in South-East England, 1530–1590: The Legal Process’, C&C 2 (1987), 37–75; Stevenson, ‘Social & Economic Contributions to the Pattern of “Suicide”; MacDonald and Murphy, Sleepless Souls, pp. 24–8.
J.S. Cockburn, ‘Trial by the Book: Fact and Theory in the Criminal Process, 1558–1625’, in Baker (ed.), Legal Records & the Historian, p. 72; T.A. Green, Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury, 1200–1800 (Chicago, 1985), pp. 141–3, 152; Cockburn, Assize Records: Introduction, pp. 70–1; Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 20 n.4; Herrup, The Common Peace, p. 161; J.S. Cockburn, ‘Twelve Silly Men? The Trial Jury at Assizes, 1560–1670’, in Cockburn and Green (eds), Twelve Good Men & True , p. 158.
For Elizabethan and Jacobean examples, see PRO STAC 5/A3/30; 5/A4/11; 5/A34/3; 5/A51/6; 5/A52/34; 8/2/42; 8/2/46. Cf. G.R. Elton, Policy and Police: The Enforcement of the Reformation in the Age of Thomas Cromwell (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 310–14; Green, Verdict According to Conscience, p. 143.
William B. Wilcox, ‘Lawyers and Litigants in Stuart England: A County Sample’, Cornell Law Quarterly 24 (1938–9), 536 n.16.
For the Jacobean case-loads, see PRO STAC 8/4–24. For the Caroline attorneys, see Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Cropping the Heath: the Fall of a Chief Justice, 1634’, HR 64 (1991), 331–43;
W.J. Jones, ‘“The Great Gamaliel of the Law”: Mr Attorney Noye’, HLQ 40 (1976–7), 197–226; and Sharpe, The Personal Rule, pp. 472, 550–2, 722–4.
Patrick Collinson, The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (1967), pp. 417–31; John Guy, ‘The Elizabethan Establishment and the Ecclesiastical Polity’, in Guy (ed.), The Reign of Elizabeth I, p. 135.
J.E. Neale, Elizabeth I and Her Parliaments, 1584–1601 (1957), pp. 137–8, 142; Richard McCoy, ‘Lord of Liberty: Francis Davison and the Cult of Elizabeth’, in Guy (ed.), The Reign of Elizabeth I, pp. 216–17; Heal, ‘The Crown, The Gentry & London’, p. 217; Baker (ed.), Dyer’s Reports, p. lxxxix.
B. Malament, ‘The “Economic Liberalism” of Edward Coke’, Yale Law Journal 86 (1966–7), 1332; Martin, Feudalism to Capitalism, pp. 172–3; Manning, Village Revolts, pp. 229–52; PRO STAC 8/17/24.
Lisa Jardine and Alan Stewart, Hostage to Fortune: The Troubled Life of Francis Bacon, 1561–1626 (1998), pp. 346–7, 430–31, 435, 439–40.
BL MS Lansdowne 620, fols. 47v–49; Keith Thomas, ‘The Puritans and Adultery: The Act of 1650 Reconsidered’, in Donald Pennington and Keith Thomas (eds), Puritans and Revolutionaries: Essays in Seventeenth-Century History Presented to Christopher Hill (Oxford, 1978), p. 267.
Richard Cust, The Forced Loan and English Politics, 1626–1628 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 60–61, 68–70, 146.
Cliffe, The Yorkshire Gentry, p. 318; Holmes, Seventeenth-Century Lincolnshire, p. 133; Hunt, The Puritan Moment, p. 283; J.T. Cliffe, The Puritan Gentry: The Great Puritan Families of Early Stuart England (1984), p. 217.
Esther S. Cope (ed.), Proceedings of the Short Parliament of 1640 (Camden Soc. 4th ser. 19, 1977), pp. 212–13: Hindle, ‘Persuasion & Protest’; Manning, Village Revolts, pp. 317–18.
Cf. E.W. Ives, ‘English Law and English Society’, History 66 (1981), 50–60;
D.N. Schiff, ‘Socio-Legal Theory, Social Structure and Law’, Modern Law Review 39 (1976), 287–310;
D.N. Schiff, ‘Law as a Social Phenomenon’, in A. Podgorecki and C.J. Whelan (eds), Sociological Approaches to Law (1981), pp. 151–66;
Douglas Hay, ‘The Criminal Prosecution in England and its Historians’, Modern Law Review 47 (1984), 1–29; and [quoting] Sugarman, ‘Writing “Law and Society” Histories’, 294.
For this terminology, see James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (New Haven, Conn., 1990), pp. 1–16, 136–82.
Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 11; Fletcher, Sussex, p. 29; Hindle, ‘The State & Local Society’, p. 133 n.83. Cf. Roger B. Manning, Hunters and Poachers: A Social and Cultural History of Unlawful Hunting in England, 1485–1640 (Oxford, 1993).
Hoyle, ‘Tenure & the Land Market’; Andy Wood, ‘Social Conflict and Change in the Mining Communities of North-West Derbyshire, c.1600–1700’, International Review of Social History 38 (1993), 31–58;
Andy Wood, ‘The Place of Custom in Plebeian Political Culture: England, 1550–1800’, SH 22 (1997), 46–60.
J.A. Sharpe, Defamation and Sexual Slander in Early Modern England: The Church Courts at York (University of York Borthwick Paper no. 58, 1980), p. 3;
Laura Gowing, ‘Women, Status and the Popular Culture of Dishonour’, TRHS 6th ser. 6 (1996), 225–34.
Barnes, ‘Star Chamber & the Sophistication of the Criminal Law’, 322–3; Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History, pp. 497–503; Adam Fox, ‘Ballads, Libels and Popular Ridicule in Jacobean England’, P&P 145 (1994), 54–6.
Fox, ‘Ballads, Libels & Popular Ridicule’; Adam Fox, ‘Popular Verses and Their Readership in the Early Seventeenth Century’, in James Raven, Helen Small and Naomi Tadmor (eds), The Practice and Representation of Reading in England (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 125–37.
Fletcher, ‘Honour, Reputation & Local Office-Holding’, p. 99; R.W. Hoyle, ‘The Earl, the Archbishop and the Council: The Affray at Fulford, May 1504’, in Rowena E. Archer and Simon Walker (eds), Rulers and Ruled in Late Medieval England: Essays Presented to Gerald Harriss (1995), p. 254.
Holmes, Seventeenth-Century Lincolnshire, p. 51; Hindle, ‘The State & Local Society’, p. 145 n.106; Wilfrid R. Prest, The Rise of the Barristers: A Social History of the English Bar, 1590–1640 (Oxford, 1986), pp. 151, 293.
Hext, ‘To Burghley’, in R.H. Tawney and Eileen Power (eds), Tudor Economic Documents (3 vols, 1924), II, p. 340.
Stone, The Crisis of the Aristocracy, p. 42; Martin Ingram, ‘Juridical Folklore in England Illustrated by Rough Music’, in Brooks and Lobban (eds), Communities & Courts, pp. 71–2; G.M. Young, ‘Some Wiltshire Cases in Star Chamber’, Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 50 (1942–4), 449; Barnes, ‘Star Chamber & the Sophistication of Criminal Law’.
John Bossy, ‘Blood and Baptism: Kinship, Community and Christianity in Western Europe from the Fourteenth to the Seventeenth Centuries’, in Derek Baker (ed.), Sanctity and Secularity: The Church and the World (SCH 10, Oxford, 1973), pp. 129–43;
John Bossy, Peace in the Post-Reformation (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 73–100.
Craig Muldrew, ‘The Culture of Reconciliation: Community and the Settlement of Economic Disputes in Early Modern England’, HJ 39 (1996), 915–42.
Wrigley and Schofield, The Population History of England, pp. 216–17, 252; cf. Keith Thomas, ‘Age and Authority in Early Modern England’, Proceedings of the British Academy 62 (1976), 205–48; Adam Fox, ‘Custom, Memory and the Authority of Writing’, in Griffiths et al. (eds), The Experience of Authority, pp. 89–116.
Ingram, ‘Ridings, Rough Music & the “Reform of Popular Culture” ’. Cf. Heal, Hospitality in Early Modern England, p. 13; Felicity Heal, ‘Reputation and Honour in Court and Country: Lady Elizabeth Russell and Sir Thomas Hoby’, TRHS 6th ser. 6 (1996), 169–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Steve Hindle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hindle, S. (2002). The Provision of Prerogative Justice. In: The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, 1550–1640. Early Modern History: Society and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288461_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288461_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0046-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28846-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)