Skip to main content

The Provision of Prerogative Justice

  • Chapter
  • 326 Accesses

Part of the book series: Early Modern History: Society and Culture ((EMH))

Abstract

In the winter of 1613–14, entitling themselves ‘the only true professors of the gospell’, two prominent Cheshire Puritans, John Bruen and John Ratcliffe, sponsored a campaign of spontaneous iconoclasm.2 While Bruen satirically claimed that he had long been called ‘Bishop Bruen’ and had ‘a visitation in purpose if God so please to give opportunity’, Ratcliffe was a substantial local brewer, twice mayor of Chester and a parliament man.3 Their servants smashed down seven stone crosses, three standing in parish churchyards, and another four in the highway. One ‘crossbreaker’ taunted the parishioners of Christleton that ‘their dagon was fallen’ and that since ‘crowes [crowbars] pulled down crosses’, ‘dawes [jackdaws] must sett them up againe’. The inhabitants threatened revenge if the magistracy failed to ‘use some course for the reprovinge of their insolences’. The iconoclasts refused to give evidence before the magistrates Sir John Savage and Bishop George Lloyd. One of them, the carpenter William Dale, scornfully argued that he would give sworn testimony only ‘if they could persuade him that the takeing of an oath were to the glory of God’. When further investigation was undertaken by justices Edward Dodd and Richard Brereton, mocking rhymes were spread abroad that ‘Dodd hath noe God, and Brereton is not God’s son’.

All suits which frequent this courte are brought hither, either by some particular person complaiyning, or els by the very vigilant eye of state

[Anonymous Treatise] ‘On the Jurisdiction of the Star Chamber’, c.16001

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For Bruen, see William Hinde, A Faithful Remonstrance of the Holy Life and Happy Death of John Bruen of Bruen Stapleford in the County of Chester, Esquire (1641 [Wing 2063]); R.C. Richardson, Puritanism in North-west England: A Regional Study of the Diocese of Chester to 1642 (Manchester, 1972), pp. 122–4;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patrick Collinson, The Religion of Protestants: The Church in English Society, 1559–1625 (Oxford, 1982), pp. 167, 169; and BL MS Additional 70001, fol. 1. For Ratcliffe, see Richardson, Puritanism in North-west England, pp. 133, 141;

    Google Scholar 

  3. and D.M. Hirst, The Representatives of the People? Voters and Voting in Earlty Stuart England (Cambridge, 1975), p. 198.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. PRO CHES 21/2, fols. 96, 100, 100v, 105. Cf. Peter Lake and Michael Questier, ‘Prisons, Priests and People’, in Nicholas Tyacke (ed.), England’s Long Reformation, 1500–1800 (1997), pp. 195–233.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For Jane Ratcliffe, see Peter Lake, ‘Feminine Piety and Personal Potency: The “Emancipation” of Mrs Jane Ratcliffe’, The Seventeenth Century 1 (1986), 143–65;

    Google Scholar 

  6. for Henry Hardware, see Patrick Collinson, The Birthpangs of Protestant England: Religious and Cultural Change in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Basingstoke, 1988), pp. 54–5, 101, 154.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Mythology’, AJLH 5 (1961), 1–11; Sharpe, The Personal Rule, pp. 665–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Slack, ‘Religious Protest and Urban Authority: The Case of Henry Sherfield, Iconoclast, 1633’, in Derek Baker (ed.), Schism, Heresy and Religious Protest (SCH 9, Cambridge, 1972), pp. 295–302;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul Slack, ‘The Public Conscience of Henry Sherfield’, in J.S. Morrill, Paul Slack and Daniel Woolf (eds), Public Duty and Private Conscience: Essays Presented to Gerald Aylmer (Oxford, 1993), pp. 151–71; Sharpe, The Personal Rule, pp. 345–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maragaret Aston, England’s Iconoclasts, Volume II: Laws Against Images (Oxford, 1988), pp. 220–342;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Margaret Aston, ‘Puritans and Iconoclasm, 1560–1660’, in Christopher Durston and Jacqueline Eales (eds), The Culture of English Puritanism, 1560–1700 (Basingstoke, 1996), pp. 92–121. Cf. chapter 7 below.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joan R. Kent, ‘“Folk Justice” and Royal Justice in Early Seventeenth-Century England: A “Charivari” in the Midlands’, MH 8 (1983), 70–85;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin Ingram, ‘Ridings, Rough Music and the “Reform of Popular Culture” in Early Modern England’, P&P 105 (1984), 79–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steve Hindle, ‘Custom, Festival and Protest in Early Modern England: The Little Budworth Wakes, St Peter’s Day, 1596’, Rural History 6 (1995), 155–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants and Their Counsel, 1596–1641’, in J.H. Baker (ed.), Legal Records and the Historian (1978), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.R. Elton (ed.), The Tudor Constitution: Documents and Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1982), pp. 163–87;

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.P. Kenyon (ed.), The Stuart Constitution: Documents and Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1986), pp. 104–10;

    Google Scholar 

  18. and J.A. Guy, The Court of Star Chamber and its Records to the Reign of Elizabeth I (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Due Process and Slow Process in the Late Elizabethan and Early Stuart Star Chamber’, AJLH 6 (1962), 224.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.A. Guy, The Cardinal’s Court: The Impact of Thomas Wolsey in Star Chamber (Hassocks, 1977), pp. 15, 23–6, 51;

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.E. Hoak, The King’s Council in the Reign of Edward VI (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 222–8, 342–3; Guy, The Court of Star Chamber, p. 9;

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Skelton, ‘The Court of Star Chamber in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth’ (unpublished University of London MA thesis, 1931), I, pp. 194–5, 196–7; Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, pp. 8–9; and Barnes, ‘Due Process & Slow Process’, 330.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 17; Barnes, ‘Due Process & Slow Process’, 335; Henry E.I. Phillips, ‘The Last Years of the Court of Star Chamber, 1630–41’, TRHS 4th ser. 21 (1938), 111; Guy, The Court of Star Chamber, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cf. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 10; Thomas G. Barnes (ed.), List and Index to the Proceedings in Star Chamber for the Reign of James I (1603–25) in the Public Record Office, London, Class STAC 8 (3 vols, Chicago, 1975), III, 11–14, 36–9; Tawney, The Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century, p. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S.J. Stevenson, ‘The Rise of Suicide Verdicts in South-East England, 1530–1590: The Legal Process’, C&C 2 (1987), 37–75; Stevenson, ‘Social & Economic Contributions to the Pattern of “Suicide”; MacDonald and Murphy, Sleepless Souls, pp. 24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.S. Cockburn, ‘Trial by the Book: Fact and Theory in the Criminal Process, 1558–1625’, in Baker (ed.), Legal Records & the Historian, p. 72; T.A. Green, Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury, 1200–1800 (Chicago, 1985), pp. 141–3, 152; Cockburn, Assize Records: Introduction, pp. 70–1; Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 20 n.4; Herrup, The Common Peace, p. 161; J.S. Cockburn, ‘Twelve Silly Men? The Trial Jury at Assizes, 1560–1670’, in Cockburn and Green (eds), Twelve Good Men & True , p. 158.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. For Elizabethan and Jacobean examples, see PRO STAC 5/A3/30; 5/A4/11; 5/A34/3; 5/A51/6; 5/A52/34; 8/2/42; 8/2/46. Cf. G.R. Elton, Policy and Police: The Enforcement of the Reformation in the Age of Thomas Cromwell (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 310–14; Green, Verdict According to Conscience, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  28. William B. Wilcox, ‘Lawyers and Litigants in Stuart England: A County Sample’, Cornell Law Quarterly 24 (1938–9), 536 n.16.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For the Jacobean case-loads, see PRO STAC 8/4–24. For the Caroline attorneys, see Thomas G. Barnes, ‘Cropping the Heath: the Fall of a Chief Justice, 1634’, HR 64 (1991), 331–43;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. W.J. Jones, ‘“The Great Gamaliel of the Law”: Mr Attorney Noye’, HLQ 40 (1976–7), 197–226; and Sharpe, The Personal Rule, pp. 472, 550–2, 722–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Patrick Collinson, The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (1967), pp. 417–31; John Guy, ‘The Elizabethan Establishment and the Ecclesiastical Polity’, in Guy (ed.), The Reign of Elizabeth I, p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.E. Neale, Elizabeth I and Her Parliaments, 1584–1601 (1957), pp. 137–8, 142; Richard McCoy, ‘Lord of Liberty: Francis Davison and the Cult of Elizabeth’, in Guy (ed.), The Reign of Elizabeth I, pp. 216–17; Heal, ‘The Crown, The Gentry & London’, p. 217; Baker (ed.), Dyer’s Reports, p. lxxxix.

    Google Scholar 

  33. B. Malament, ‘The “Economic Liberalism” of Edward Coke’, Yale Law Journal 86 (1966–7), 1332; Martin, Feudalism to Capitalism, pp. 172–3; Manning, Village Revolts, pp. 229–52; PRO STAC 8/17/24.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lisa Jardine and Alan Stewart, Hostage to Fortune: The Troubled Life of Francis Bacon, 1561–1626 (1998), pp. 346–7, 430–31, 435, 439–40.

    Google Scholar 

  35. BL MS Lansdowne 620, fols. 47v–49; Keith Thomas, ‘The Puritans and Adultery: The Act of 1650 Reconsidered’, in Donald Pennington and Keith Thomas (eds), Puritans and Revolutionaries: Essays in Seventeenth-Century History Presented to Christopher Hill (Oxford, 1978), p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Richard Cust, The Forced Loan and English Politics, 1626–1628 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 60–61, 68–70, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cliffe, The Yorkshire Gentry, p. 318; Holmes, Seventeenth-Century Lincolnshire, p. 133; Hunt, The Puritan Moment, p. 283; J.T. Cliffe, The Puritan Gentry: The Great Puritan Families of Early Stuart England (1984), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Esther S. Cope (ed.), Proceedings of the Short Parliament of 1640 (Camden Soc. 4th ser. 19, 1977), pp. 212–13: Hindle, ‘Persuasion & Protest’; Manning, Village Revolts, pp. 317–18.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cf. E.W. Ives, ‘English Law and English Society’, History 66 (1981), 50–60;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. D.N. Schiff, ‘Socio-Legal Theory, Social Structure and Law’, Modern Law Review 39 (1976), 287–310;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. D.N. Schiff, ‘Law as a Social Phenomenon’, in A. Podgorecki and C.J. Whelan (eds), Sociological Approaches to Law (1981), pp. 151–66;

    Google Scholar 

  42. Douglas Hay, ‘The Criminal Prosecution in England and its Historians’, Modern Law Review 47 (1984), 1–29; and [quoting] Sugarman, ‘Writing “Law and Society” Histories’, 294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. For this terminology, see James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (New Haven, Conn., 1990), pp. 1–16, 136–82.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber Litigants’, p. 11; Fletcher, Sussex, p. 29; Hindle, ‘The State & Local Society’, p. 133 n.83. Cf. Roger B. Manning, Hunters and Poachers: A Social and Cultural History of Unlawful Hunting in England, 1485–1640 (Oxford, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoyle, ‘Tenure & the Land Market’; Andy Wood, ‘Social Conflict and Change in the Mining Communities of North-West Derbyshire, c.1600–1700’, International Review of Social History 38 (1993), 31–58;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Andy Wood, ‘The Place of Custom in Plebeian Political Culture: England, 1550–1800’, SH 22 (1997), 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J.A. Sharpe, Defamation and Sexual Slander in Early Modern England: The Church Courts at York (University of York Borthwick Paper no. 58, 1980), p. 3;

    Google Scholar 

  48. Laura Gowing, ‘Women, Status and the Popular Culture of Dishonour’, TRHS 6th ser. 6 (1996), 225–34.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Barnes, ‘Star Chamber & the Sophistication of the Criminal Law’, 322–3; Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History, pp. 497–503; Adam Fox, ‘Ballads, Libels and Popular Ridicule in Jacobean England’, P&P 145 (1994), 54–6.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fox, ‘Ballads, Libels & Popular Ridicule’; Adam Fox, ‘Popular Verses and Their Readership in the Early Seventeenth Century’, in James Raven, Helen Small and Naomi Tadmor (eds), The Practice and Representation of Reading in England (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 125–37.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fletcher, ‘Honour, Reputation & Local Office-Holding’, p. 99; R.W. Hoyle, ‘The Earl, the Archbishop and the Council: The Affray at Fulford, May 1504’, in Rowena E. Archer and Simon Walker (eds), Rulers and Ruled in Late Medieval England: Essays Presented to Gerald Harriss (1995), p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Holmes, Seventeenth-Century Lincolnshire, p. 51; Hindle, ‘The State & Local Society’, p. 145 n.106; Wilfrid R. Prest, The Rise of the Barristers: A Social History of the English Bar, 1590–1640 (Oxford, 1986), pp. 151, 293.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hext, ‘To Burghley’, in R.H. Tawney and Eileen Power (eds), Tudor Economic Documents (3 vols, 1924), II, p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stone, The Crisis of the Aristocracy, p. 42; Martin Ingram, ‘Juridical Folklore in England Illustrated by Rough Music’, in Brooks and Lobban (eds), Communities & Courts, pp. 71–2; G.M. Young, ‘Some Wiltshire Cases in Star Chamber’, Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 50 (1942–4), 449; Barnes, ‘Star Chamber & the Sophistication of Criminal Law’.

    Google Scholar 

  55. John Bossy, ‘Blood and Baptism: Kinship, Community and Christianity in Western Europe from the Fourteenth to the Seventeenth Centuries’, in Derek Baker (ed.), Sanctity and Secularity: The Church and the World (SCH 10, Oxford, 1973), pp. 129–43;

    Google Scholar 

  56. John Bossy, Peace in the Post-Reformation (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Craig Muldrew, ‘The Culture of Reconciliation: Community and the Settlement of Economic Disputes in Early Modern England’, HJ 39 (1996), 915–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wrigley and Schofield, The Population History of England, pp. 216–17, 252; cf. Keith Thomas, ‘Age and Authority in Early Modern England’, Proceedings of the British Academy 62 (1976), 205–48; Adam Fox, ‘Custom, Memory and the Authority of Writing’, in Griffiths et al. (eds), The Experience of Authority, pp. 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ingram, ‘Ridings, Rough Music & the “Reform of Popular Culture” ’. Cf. Heal, Hospitality in Early Modern England, p. 13; Felicity Heal, ‘Reputation and Honour in Court and Country: Lady Elizabeth Russell and Sir Thomas Hoby’, TRHS 6th ser. 6 (1996), 169–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 Steve Hindle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hindle, S. (2002). The Provision of Prerogative Justice. In: The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, 1550–1640. Early Modern History: Society and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288461_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288461_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0046-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28846-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics