Conclusion — the Legacy and Price of Rapprochement without Reparation

Part of the St Antony’s Series book series


Postwar rapprochement of Malaya with Japan took place in a very different context from the rapprochement of most of the other SouthEast Asian countries with Japan in the following three ways. First, during the war, while the Japanese Military Administration at least promised to grant nominal independence to other occupied areas of South-East Asia, it was determined to keep Malaya under its direct control because of her strategic and economic importance. After the Japanese surrender, the British administration returned and, as explained in Chapter 3, was even more determined to retain Malaya as the South-East Asian stronghold of the British strategy, economy, and prestige once lost to the Japanese. Especially after the independence of India and Burma, Malaya’s importance for Britain as her remaining Asian stronghold grew even greater. Moreover, Malaya’s rubber and tin made her the biggest dollar earner in the Sterling Area. The British presence in Malaya was also prolonged by the Emergency and the need for economic and political stability as a prerequisite for ‘safe’ decolonization for Britain to maintain influence in and informal control of Malaya and South-East Asia.


Prime Minister Iron Mining SouthEast Asian Country East Asia Economic British Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 15.
    Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman, ‘PROTON-sha Shitauke Keikaku ni yoru Bumiputra Chusho Kigyo no Ikusei’, in Hara Fujio (ed.), Bumiputra Kigyo no Taito to Malayjin Kajin Keizai Kyoryoku (Tokyo: IDE, 1995), pp. 38, 43, 46–8.Google Scholar
  2. 22.
    Kobayashi Hideo, Nihon Gunseika no Asia (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1993), pp. 198f.Google Scholar
  3. 23.
    Matsukata Saburo, ‘Kokusaiteki ChOsei no Tameni’, Chuo KOron, January 1955, pp. 21f.Google Scholar
  4. 32.
    Hagiwara Yoshiyuki, ‘TOnan Asia no Kuniguni kara mita Nihon no Kyokasho Mondai’, in Shakaika Kyokasho Shippitsusha Kondankai (ed.), Kyokasho Mondai towa Nanika (Tokyo: Miraisha, 1984), pp. 136–49.Google Scholar
  5. 34.
    Onuma Yasuaki, Tokyo Saiban kara Sengo Sekinin no Shisoe, 3rd edn (Tokyo: TOshindO, 1993), p. 243.Google Scholar
  6. 35.
    Text of Prime Minister Kaifu’s Policy Speech: Straits Times, 4 May 1991. Cheah Sue Kun, ‘Malaysia, Singapore’, pp. 227f. Hagiwara, Rahman to Mahathir, p. 200. Tanaka Hiroshi, ‘Nihon no Sengo Sekinin to Asia’, in Mitani TaichirO (ed.), Iwanami KOza: Gendai Nihon to Shokuminchi 8: Asia no Reisen to Datsushokuminchika (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1993), p. 210, quoting Lian He Zao Bao, 1 June 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 36.
    Arai Shin’ichi, ‘Sengo HoshO to Sengo Sekinin’, in Nakamura Masanori, Amakawa Akira et al. (eds), Sengo Nihon: Senryo to Sengo Kaikaku 5: Kako no Seisan (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995), p. 260.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Junko Tomaru 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of International Cooperation StudiesKobe UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations