Skip to main content

“The ‘Three Happinesses’ and Public Policy”

  • Chapter
Happiness and Public Policy

Abstract

In the American Declaration of Independence (1776), it is stated:

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and Happiness.

I had found no significant relationship between happiness and time over a period in which GDP per capita grew by one-third, from 1972 to 1991 (Easterlin 1995, pp. 37–8). Charles Kenny (1999, pp. 14–15), based on a correlation of happiness with GDP per capita over the period 1952 to 1988, found a significant negative relationship in the United States… [O]ne needs to develop an empirically tested causal model that includes the life satisfaction derived from multiple sources — not just material goods, but also family life, health, work utility, and the like (Easterlin 2003). A better understanding of the causes of happiness will provide a more secure foundation for policy recommendations.

Richard Easterlin (2004b)

To be without some of the things you want is an indispensable part of happiness.

Bertrand Russell

Virtue is not an end in itself. Virtue is not its own reward…. Life is the reward of virtue — and happiness is the goal and reward of life.1

Ayn Rand

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainslie, George (1992) Picoeconomics: The Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary, S. (1965) “A Theory of the Allocation of Time”, The Economic Journal, 75(299): 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy (1789) Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, from website http://www.la.utexas.edu/labyrinth/ipml

  • Diener, E. and Suh, E. (1999) “National differences in subjective well-being”, Chapter 22 in Kahneman, Diener and Schwartz (eds), 434–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. Kenneth (1958) The Affluent Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John, C. (1953) “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk Taking”, Journal of Political Economy, LXI: 434–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, Joh, C. (1955) “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility”, Journal of Political Economy, LXIII: 309–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, Rick (July 2003) “Skill Signaling, Prospect Theory, and Regret Theory”, Claremont Colleges Working Paper No. 2002–03. http://ssrn.com/abstract=311409

  • Joseph, Stephen (1999) Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 2: 117–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.E., Peter P. Wakker and Rakesh Sarin (1997) “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Kelvin (1966) “A New Approach to Consumer Theory”, Journal of Political Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, Lord Richard (2003) “Happiness — Has Social Science a Clue?” Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A.H. (1970) Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y.K. (2002) “The East-Asian Happiness Gap — Speculating on Causes and Implications”, Pacific Economic Review, 7(1): 51–63. http://fol.math.sdu.edu.cn/tyx/content/content.php?id=99&tb=wlg

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offer, A. (2000) “Economic welfare measurements and human well-being”, University of Oxford Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, Ayn (1957) Atlas Shrugged, 35th Anniversary Edition, New York: Signet, p. 939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, Ayn (1984) For the New Intellectual. New York: Signet, Reissue edition, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., V.I. Chirkov, T.D. Little, K.M. Sheldon, M. Kennon, E. Timoshina, and E.L. Deci (1999) “The American dream in Russia: Extrinsic aspirations and well-being in two cultures”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 1509–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Barry (2003) The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, Ecco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Lok Sang Ho

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ho, L.S. (2006). “The ‘Three Happinesses’ and Public Policy”. In: Ng, YK., Ho, L.S. (eds) Happiness and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288027_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics