Skip to main content

Growth Policies in Europe

A Problem of Collective Action?

  • Chapter
  • 59 Accesses

Part of the book series: Report on the State of the European Union ((RSEU))

Abstract

While the European summit at Lisbon in the spring of 2000, in the euphoria of a relatively sustained period of growth, proclaimed ambitious objectives for employment rates and promised to make the EU ‘the most competitive knowledge-based economy …’, the five years that followed unfortunately recorded economic performance well below these ambitions. Harsh diagnoses on the state of the European economy and its chief members have multiplied in recent years (Camdessus et al., 2004; Kok ét al., 2004; Sapir et al., 2004; Blanchard et al., 2005). They concur in identifying some serious slack in the European economy in comparison with the United States and in the emphasis placed on the dangers that the prospects of lasting weak growth would pose for the financing of European systems of social protection in particular, which would not be supported by demographic change (because of the rapid ageing of European populations) or by technical progress since efforts in research and development in Europe are inadequate. All blame the ‘rigidities’ that are characteristic of European economies, especially in the labour markets, the inertia of public sectors and the too heavy tax burden on the net return from the efforts and savings for financing them and social protection. All seem to agree on the idea that the macroeconomic policies are globally good, or at any rate that the ‘stability culture’ shared by the chief leaders at the heart of the European economic and monetary union — the famous ‘Brussels-Frankfurt consensus’ (Sapir et al., 2004) — and the institutions that are inspired by and support it (the independent central bank, pursuing a primary objective of price stability, and the SGP framing the national budgetary policies) are all in no way responsible for the poor economic performance of the eurozone, and that only ‘structural reforms’ radically transforming the European welfare states and drastically lightening their financial burden are likely to encourage a salutary ‘rebound’ (Camdessus et al., 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Baldwin, R. and M. Widgrén (2004a), ‘Winners and Losers under Various Dual Majority Rules for the EU Council of Ministers’, CEPR Discussion Papers no. 4450, London, Centre for Economic Policy Research, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and M. Widgrén (2004b), ‘Council Voting in the Constitutional Treaty: Devil in the Details’, Université de Genève Policy Paper, 23 June, http://www.unige.ge/baldwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, Olivier, et alii (2005), L’Europe déclassée?, Collection ‘Temps réel’, Paris, Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (2004), ‘The Perspectives, 18 (4), Fall 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camdessus, Michel et al. (2004), Le Sursaut, vers une nouvelle croissance pour la France, Report of a working group headed by Michel Camdessus at the Ministry of Economy and Finance, Paris, La Documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.-P. and J. Le Cacheux (eds) (2003), Rapport sur l’état de l’Union européenne 2004, Paris, Fayard and Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2004), ‘The Institutions of Monetary Policy’, Richard T. Ely Lecture, AEA Papers & Proceedings, American Economic Review, 94 (2), May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, W. et al. (2004), ‘Facing the Challenge. The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment’, November, http://www.europa.eu.int.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É. and J. Le Cacheux (2004), ‘L’Europe “boucles d’or”: trois maximes pour sortir d’une impasse’, Lettre de l’OECE, 246, 30 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É. and J. Le Cacheux (2006), ‘Integrity and Efficiency in the EU: The Case against the European Economic Constitution’, Centre for European Studies Working Paper Series no. 130, Harvard University, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cacheux, J. (2000), ‘Les Dangers de la concurrence fiscale et sociale en Europe’, in Questions européennes, Rapport du Conseil d’analyse économique, 27, Paris, La Documentation française, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cacheux, J. (2004), ‘L’Avenir du budget européen et le financement des politiques communes’, in Maxime Lefebvre (ed.), Quel budget européen à l’horizon 20131, Paris, IFRI/CEES-La Documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Wallace E. (1999), ‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, pp. 1120-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. et al. (2004), An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Paul Fitoussi Jacques Le Cacheux

Copyright information

© 2007 OFCE

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitoussi, JP., Cacheux, J.L. (2007). Growth Policies in Europe. In: Fitoussi, JP., Cacheux, J.L. (eds) Report on the State of the European Union. Report on the State of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287938_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics