Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Report on the State of the European Union ((RSEU))

  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

Is Europe in decline? Over recent years, the macroeconomic performance of the European Union has been conspicuously weak, with low growth and high unemployment, in absolute terms and relative to the rest of the world. While some of this poor showing may be attributable to cyclical factors, there is clearly a more profound, structural element to the European lack of economic dynamism that so clearly revealed itself in the 1990s. But what are the major causes of this ‘structural slump’ (Phelps, 1994)?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson and J.A. Robinson (2001), ‘Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution’, NBER Working Paper, no. 8460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and S.N. Durlauf (eds) (2005), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudchon, H., J. Creel, J.-L. Gaffard, E. Laurent, J. Le Cacheux, P. Musso and Ingénue team (2005), ‘Potential Growth in the EU: Prospects from Technical Progress and Eastern Enlargement’, International Collaboration Project, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, and Nomura Research Institute, Final Report, January 2005, http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/prj-2004_2005/macro/macro16/05-l-R.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I. (2004), Funding the European Union. Making Sense of the EU Budget, A Federal Trust Report on the Union’s Budget, London, The Federal Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (2004), ‘The Economic Future of Europe’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (4), Fall 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. and J. Driffill (1988), ‘Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance’, Economic Policy, 6, pp. 13-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camdessus Report, Ministère français de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie (2004), Le Sursaut - Vers une nouvelle croissance pour la France, Paris, La Documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2000), Presidency Conclusions, Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2004), Presidency Conclusions, Brussels European Council, 25 and 26 March 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000), ‘The EU Economic 2000 Review’, chapter 3 ‘Economic Growth in the EU: Is a New Pattern Emerging?’, European Economy, 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003), The Social Situation in the European Union, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004a), Report from the High Level Group Chaired by Wim Kok: Facing the Challenge - The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004b), ‘Building Our Common Future: Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013’, COM (2004) 101, Brussels, 10 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.-P. (2002), ‘Comments on Nickell, Nunziata, Ochel and Quintini’, in P. Aghion, R. Frydman, J. Stiglitz and M. Woodford (eds), Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, pp. 432-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J-P. and E. Laurent (2005), ‘Time Inconsistency in the EU, The Sequel’, Challenge Europe no. 13: ‘What Future for Europe’s Economic and Social Model’, European Policy Centre, Brussels, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.-P. and J. Le Cacheux (eds), (2005), L’Etat de l’Union européenne 2005, Paris, Fayard and Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.-P. and O. Passet (2000), ‘Réduction du chômage: les réussites en Europe’, Rapport du Conseil d’Analyse Économique no. 23, Paris, La Documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. (2000), ‘Single Peaked vs. Diversified Capitalism: The Relation between Economic Institutions and Outcomes’, NBER Working Paper no. 7556.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, D.W. and P.A. Hall (2004), ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis’, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Discussion Paper 04/5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. et al. (2004), ‘Do Institutions Cause Growth?’, NBER Working Paper no. 10568.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E. and Jones, C.I. (1999), ‘Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, Vol. 114, pp. 83-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and D. Soskice (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W. (2001), ‘Information Technology and the US Economy’, Discussion Paper no. 1911, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, January (also in American Economic Review, 91 (1), March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W. (2004a), ‘Accounting for Growth in the Information Age’, in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W. (2004b), ‘Information Technology and the G7 Economies’, Harvard University, mimeo, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, W. et al. (2004), Facing the Challenge: The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment (Report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok), EU Commission, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., S. Nickell and R. Jackman (1991), Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cacheux, J. (2004), ‘Negotiating the Medium-Term Financial Perspectives for the Enlarged EU: The Future of the European Budget’, Revue de VOFCE, special issue The New EU Enlargement’, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cacheux, J. (2005), ‘European Budget: The Poisonous Budget Rebate Debate’, Notes de Notre Europe, 41, June, http://www.notre-europe.asso.fr.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1994), ‘Economic Performance through Time’, American Economic Review, 84(3), June 1994, pp. 359-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000), ‘A New Economy? The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth’, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, contribution for the June 2000 meeting of the OECD Council at ministerial level.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001), ‘The New Economy: Beyond the Hype’, final report on the OECD growth project, meetings of the OECD Council at ministerial level.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004), ‘The Economic Impact of ICT - Measurement, Evidence and Implications’.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, M. and B. van Ark (2003), ‘EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective - Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process?’, DG Enterprise, European Commission, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. (1994), Structural Slumps - The Modern Equilibrium Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Assets, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E. (2004), ‘Prosperity and Depression’, Richard T. Ely Lecture, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 92 (2), May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2004), ‘Getting Institutions Right’, CESifo DICE Report, Summer 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian and F. Trebbi (2002), ‘Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development’, NBER Working Paper no. 9305.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003), ‘Institutions Don’t Rule: Direct Effect of Geography on Per Capita Income’, NBER Working Paper no. 9490.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. et al. (2004), An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. and A.B. Krueger (2002), The Roaring Nineties - Can Full Employment Be Sustained? New York, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (2004), ‘A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), pp. 563-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Paul Fitoussi Jacques Le Cacheux

Copyright information

© 2007 OFCE

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitoussi, JP., Cacheux, J.L. (2007). The Lisbon Strategy. In: Fitoussi, JP., Cacheux, J.L. (eds) Report on the State of the European Union. Report on the State of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287938_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics