Abstract
Salman Rushdie’s work has been formed by his obsession with history and the way its elusive quality constantly betrays those certainties we die to believe. Taking as his target the slippery nature of ontological histories: nationalist, ethnic, regional and religious, his novels show us that these histories have proved less than stalwart; betraying his characters, forcing them to recognize that all that seems solid is in fact air, entrapping them in their claims to truth, permanency and belonging, he delivers them only when they accept their rootlessness as the true human condition. Curious then, that this prophet of transformation and rebirth has himself been witness to the irrevocability of history and the claims of religion and national myths. Curiouser still, he has since found his latest incarnation as a celebrity writer in the country where the erasure of history, of immigrants and others, is a rite of passage. Now he finds himself as a polemicist without an object to hate. Paradoxically, it is since moving to the United States that his novels, both rooted in and rooting against history, have found nothing to attack, and so have been solipsistically about himself, trapped airily without the anchor of history. This cosmopolitan writer, in a fascinating return of the repressed, finds himself without the form of history to sustain his scorn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Salman Rushdie, ‘Handsworth Songs’, in Imaginary Homelands (New York: Viking Press, 1991), 117.
Paul Gilroy, There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
Salman Rushdie, Step Across This Line: Collected Nonfiction 1999–2002 (New York: Random House, 2002), 60.
Sara Maitland, ‘The Author Is Too Much with Us’, Commonweal, CXXIII, 3 (1996), 22–3.
Slavoj Žižek, ‘The Undergrowth of Enjoyment’, in Edmond Wright and Elizabeth Wright, eds, The Žižek Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), 17.
Shailja Sharma, ‘Salman Rushdie: the Ambivalence of Migrancy’, Twentieth-Century Literature, 47, 4 (2001), 596–618.
Salman Rushdie, The Satanic Verses (New York: Viking, 1989), 168
Fay Weldon, Sacred Cows (London: Chatto and Windus, 1990)
Modood’s reference here is to Fay Weldon, ‘Introduction’, in Tariq Modood and Pnina Werbner, eds, The Politics of Multi-Culturalism in the New Europe (London and New York: Zed Books), 3.
Agha Shahid Ali, The Country without a Post Office: Poems (New York: Norton, 1997).
Salman Rushdie, Fury (London: Vintage, 2002)
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Shailja Sharma
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, S. (2007). ’Precious Gift/Piece of Shit’: Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses and the Revenge of History. In: Morrison, J., Watkins, S. (eds) Scandalous Fictions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287846_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287846_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54484-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28784-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)