Skip to main content
  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

In ‘Why the Novel Matters’ (1925), an essay on the special kind of ‘knowledge’ possessed by the novelist, Lawrence chips irreverently away at the foundational status of the Cartesian mind-body dualism. Why should he look at his hand, as it writes, and conclude that it is ‘a mere nothing compared to the mind that directs it’? The hand ‘flickers’ with a life of its own, and comes to learn and know things through touch. It slips along, jumps to dot an i, gets cold or bored — in fact, has its own ‘rudiments’ of thought. ‘Why should I imagine that there is a me which is more me than my hand is?’ (P 533)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Keith Ansell-Pearson, ‘Bergson and Creative Evolution/Involution: Exposing the Transcendental Illusion of Organismic Life’, in John Mullarkey (ed.), The New Bergson (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1999), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cited in Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin (London: Michael Joseph, 1991), p. xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amit Chaudhuri, D.H. Lawrence and ‘Difference’: Postcoloniality and the Poetry of the Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 128.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Jean-François Lyotard, The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ansell-Pearson, ‘Bergson and Creative Evolution/Involution’, pp. 161, 159. The quotation is from Richard Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel Dennett, Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness (London: Phoenix, 1996), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raymond Williams, Problems in Materialism and Culture (London: Verso, 1997), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Jeff Wallace

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallace, J. (2005). Posthuman D.H. Lawrence?. In: D.H. Lawrence, Science and the Posthuman. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287631_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics