Skip to main content

Writing Matter: Science, Language and Materialism

  • Chapter
D.H. Lawrence, Science and the Posthuman
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

What did it mean for Lawrence to connect the art of Paul Cézanne with the ‘actual existence’ of matter? The judgement was in no sense purely art-historical. Early in 1929, Lawrence completed ‘Introduction to These Paintings’, the essay in which the claim was made, and as the year progressed two further, sustained discursive essays, ‘A Propos of Lady Chatterley’s Lover’ and Apocalypse, emerged. Despite their differing focuses, all three essays show Lawrence, at this late stage in his life, returning to the subject of science with renewed, if still highly critical, interest. Science, he wrote in a draft fragment of Apocalypse, had become a ‘nothingness’ of the same order as the atom which now, according to modern physics, was unimaginable; and therefore, ‘I give it up’ (A 164). Yet Lawrence had spent most of his creative life claiming to give science up, and the essays suggest that he still had not quite succeeded.

The actual fact is that in Cézanne modern French art made its first tiny step back to real substance, to objective substance, if we may call it so.… It seems a small thing to do: yet it is the first real sign that man has made for several thousands of years that he is willing to admit that matter actually exists.

‘Introduction to These Paintings’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Marie Cariou, ‘Bergson: The Keyboards of Forgetting’, in John Mullarkey (ed.), The New Bergson (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1999), pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982), p. 456.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornel West, The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989), p. 67.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. For a fuller discussion of this point and others in this section, see my ‘Introduction: Difficulty and Defamiliarisation — Language and Process in The Origin of Species’, in D. Amigoni and J. Wallace (eds), Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species; New Interdisciplinary Essays (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1995), pp. 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (1859; Ware: Wordsworth Classics, 1998), pp. vii–xxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tess Cosslett, ‘Introductory essay’, in Cosslett (ed.), Science and Religion in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacques Barzun, Darwin, Marx, Wagner: Critique of a Heritage (London: Secker and Warburg, 1942), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Samuel Butler, Life and Habit (1910; London: Wildwood House, 1981), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sources here are: J.W. Burrow, Evolution and Society: A Study in Victorian Social Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  10. John H. Goldthorpe, ‘Herbert Spencer’, in Timothy Raison (ed.), The Founding Fathers of Social Science (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969), pp. 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adrian Desmond, Archetypes and Ancestors: Palaeontology in Victorian London 1850–1875 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.H. Huxley, ‘Science and Culture’, in Collected Essays of T.H. Huxley, Vol. III: Science and Education (London: Macmillan, 1895), pp. 140–1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. James Paradis, T.H. Huxley: Man’s Place in Nature (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1978), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.H. Huxley, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays (London: Macmillan, 1894), p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.H. Lawrence, Movements in Modern European History, ed. Philip Crumpton (1921; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 260–1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Jean Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, trans. Mark Poster (St. Louis: Telos Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michael Payne and John Schad (eds.), Life.After.Theory (London and New York: Continuum, 2003), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.M. Coetzee, ‘Newton and the Ideal of a Transparent Scientific Language’, Journal of Literary Semantics 11 (1982), pp. 3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Jeff Wallace

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallace, J. (2005). Writing Matter: Science, Language and Materialism. In: D.H. Lawrence, Science and the Posthuman. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287631_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics