Advertisement

Abstract

‘Evolution’, wrote Henri Bergson in Creative Evolution (1907), ‘reveals to us how the intellect has been formed, by an uninterrupted progress, along a line which ascends through the vertebrate series up to man’. The intellect had evolved as a tool with which to ‘think matter’; that is, to secure the ‘perfect fitting of our body to its environment’ and to ‘represent the relations of external things among themselves’. Yet, this fortunate sense of ‘uninterrupted progress’ must be tempered, Bergson insists, by a recognition that something in the very nature of intellect as an evolved (rather than, for example, divinely ordained) entity places a necessary limitation on it. From this evolved condition,

(I)t must also follow that our thought, in its purely logical form, is incapable of presenting the true nature of life, the full meaning of the evolutionary movement. Created by life, in definite circumstances, to act on definite things, how can it embrace life, of which it is only an emanation or an aspect? Deposited by the evolutionary movement in the course of its way, how can it be applied to the evolutionary movement itself? As well contend that the part is equal to the whole, that the effect can reabsorb its cause, or that the pebble left on the beach displays the form of the wave that brought it there (CE ix–x).

Keywords

Material World Frankfurt School Creative Evolution Cartesian Dualism Bourgeois Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Teny Eagleton, Ideology: An Introduction (London: Verso, 1991), p. 159.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy (1872), in The Birth of Tragedy and The Genealogy of Morals, trans. F. Golffing (New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1956), p. 111.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Winwood Reade, The Martyrdom of Man (1872; London: Watts and Co., 1933), p. 331.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See Edward Nehls, D.H. Lawrence: A Composite Biography, Vol. III (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1959), p. 287.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    J.M. Robertson, ‘The Theism of Earl Balfour’ (1923), in Spoken Essays (London: Watts and Co., 1925), p. 171.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Jessie Chambers, D.H. Lawrence: A Personal Record (1935; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), pp. 112–13.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Aldous Huxley, ‘Introduction’ to Letters of D.H. Lawrence (1932), in Harry T. Boulton (ed.), The Collected Letters of D.H. Lawrence, Vol. 2 (London: Heinemann, 1962), p. 1252.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    .Aldous Huxley, Literature and Science (New Haven: Leete’s Island Books, 1963), p. 24.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Linda Ruth Williams, Sex in the Head: Visions of Femininity and Film in D.H. Lawrence (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993), p. 45.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    For this mapping of existentialism, see William Banett, Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy (New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1962).Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    Theodor W. Adomo and Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944; trans. John dimming; London and New York: Verso, 1995), pp. 3–39Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    TS. Eliot, After Strange Gods: A Primer of Modern Heresy (London: Faber and Faber, 1934), p. 58.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Eliseo Vivas, D.H. Lawrence: The Failure and Triumph of Art (London: Allen and Unwin, 1961), p. 92.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Michael Black, D.H. Lawrence: The Early Fiction (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1986), pp. 148–9.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Percy Bysshe Shelley, ‘A Defense of Poetry’, in Harold Bloom (ed.), The Selected Poetry and Prose of Shelley (1966; New York: Meridian, 1978), pp. 441–2.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Raymond Williams, Culture and Society 1780–1950 (London: Chatto and Windus, 1958), p. 43.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    See, for example, John Beer, ‘Lawrence’s Counter-Romanticism’, in Gamini Salgado and G.K. Das (eds), The Spirit of D.H. Lawrence: Centenary Studies (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988), pp. 46–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robert Montgomery, The Visionary D.H. Lawrence: Beyond Philosophy and Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 27.
    F.R. Leavis, D.H. Lawrence: Novelist (1955; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976), p. 29.Google Scholar
  20. 29.
    F.R. Leavis, Thought, Words and Creativity: Art and Thought in Lawrence (London: Chatto and Windus, 1976), p. 45.Google Scholar
  21. 31.
    Donald R. Benson, ‘Facts and Constructs: Victorian Humanists and Scientific Theorists on Scientific Knowledge’, in James Paradis amd Thomas Postlewait (eds), Victorian Science and Victorian Values: Literary Perspectives (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1985), pp. 299–318.Google Scholar
  22. 35.
    Francis Mulhern, The Moment of Scrutiny’ (London: New Left Books, 1979), p. 297.Google Scholar
  23. 37.
    John Worthen, D.H. Lawrence: The Early Years 1885–1912 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 184Google Scholar
  24. Daniel Schneider, The Consciousness of D.H. Lawrence: An Intellectual Biography (Kansas and London: University of Kansas Press/Eurospan, 1987), p. 8.Google Scholar
  25. 40.
    Francis Fukuyama, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (London: Profile Books, 2002), p. 7.Google Scholar
  26. 43.
    N. Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999), pp. 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 49.
    Sean Watson, ‘The New Bergsonism: Discipline, Subjectivity and Freedom’, Radical Philosophy 92 (November/December 1998), pp. 6–16.Google Scholar
  28. 50.
    Gilles Deleuze, Bergsonism, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam (New York: Zone Books, 1991), p. 25.Google Scholar
  29. 53.
    Leo Bersani, A Future for Astyanax: Character and Desire in Literature (Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Co., 1976), p. x.Google Scholar
  30. 54.
    Ed Jewinski, ‘The Phallus in D.H. Lawrence and Jacques Lacan’, D.H. Lawrence Review 21 (1989), p. 20.Google Scholar
  31. 56.
    Schneider, The Consciousness of D.H. Lawrence, p. 66; Jonathan Arac, Critical Genealogies: Historical Situations for Postmodern Literary Studies (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989), p. 149.Google Scholar
  32. 57.
    Anne Fernihough, D.H. Lawrence: Aesthetics and Ideology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 59.
    Colin Clarke, River of Dissolution: D.H. Lawrence and English Romanticism (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969), pp. 72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jeff Wallace 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff Wallace

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations