Abstract
In this chapter I will describe the controversy that exists concerning the interpretation of the antinomy of reflective judgment and argue for a unitary reading of the Dialectic of Teleological Judgment. I will connect my reading to an account of the antinomy of judgments of taste in the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. In doing so, I will present a detailed response to Werner Pluhar’s interpretation of the relation between the Antinomies of Taste and Teleological Judgment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
George Schrader (1953–4) ‘The Status of Teleological Judgments in the Critical Philosophy’, Kant-Studien, Vol. 45.
John D. McFarland (1970) Kant’s Concept of Teleology (University of Edinburgh Press: Edinburgh and Chicago).
In addition to McFarland and Schrader, see Robert E. Butts (1984) Kant and The Double Government Methodology (D. Reidel: Dordrecht).
Werner Pluhar (1987) ‘Translator’s Introduction’ to his translation. p. lxxxix.
Copyright information
© 2000 Gary Banham
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banham, G. (2000). The Antinomy of Reflective Judgment Re-treated. In: Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287600_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287600_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40693-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28760-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)