Advertisement

Patterns of Enmity: Varieties of Narrative

Chapter
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The rhetoric of hostility is a ubiquitous feature of politics and government. But the ways in which enemies are described, the nature of the perceived and alleged threats, the identification of enemies, the identity of the enmity narrator, and the context and consequences of narration, all differ widely. To say that enmity is a recurring feature of political life tells us only in the very broadest terms what to expect. It indicates a range of possibilities, but within that range an eclectic variety is all we can predict. Up to this point of the discussion, I have spoken of enmity and enemies as a single broad type, and discussed the various accounts of enmity in relation to this comprehensive category. But it is now both possible and desirable to make the discussion more precise, in order to distinguish the many points on a scale which can run from murderous calls for extermination, to restrained and civil competition in parliamentary politics.

Keywords

Ideal Type Constitutional Democracy Foreign Power Threatening Group Objective Threat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There (London: Collins, 1954 [1872]), p. 152.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quoted in Mark Knight, ‘Faults on Both Sides: the Conspiracies of Party Politics under the Later Stuarts’, in Barry Coward and Julian Swann (eds), Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theory in Early Modern Europe: From the Waldensians to the French Revolution (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), p. 157.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    David F. Epstein, Personal Enmity in Roman Politics, 218–43 BC. (London: Croom Helm, 1987), p. 1.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Christopher Browning and Jürgen Matthäus, The Origins of the Final Solution: the Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy1939–42 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004), p. 10.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    David J. Finlay, Ole R. Holsti, and Richard R. Fagen, Enemies in Politics (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967), p. 7.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Siân Nicholas, The Echo of War: Home Front Propaganda and the Wartime BBC, 1939–49 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), p. 149.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Heinrich Mann, 1933, quoted in Matthew Stibbe, German Anglophobia and the Great War, 1914–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 2.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Matthew Stibbe, German Anglophobia and the Great War, 1914–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    Fred Halliday, Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics in the Middle East, 2nd edition (London: I. B. Tauris, 2003), p. 171.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    John Gallagher and Chris Bull, Perfect Enemies: the Religious Right, the Gay Movement, and the Politics of the 1990s (New York: Crown Publishers Inc., 1996).Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Jonathan Fox and Sandler Shmuel suggest that whilst liberal democratic pluralism discourages discrimination against ethnic minorities, religious groups can have beliefs which challenge liberal pluralism, and are thus more of a threat to liberal democracy which is secular, than to semi-democracies which are not necessarily so. Jonathan Fox and Sandler Shmuel, ‘Regime Types and Discrimination against Ethnoreligious Minorities: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Autocracy-Democracy Continuum’, Political Studies, 51, 3, October (2003), pp. 469–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 20.
    Wolfgang Behringer, Witches and Witch-hunts: a Global History (Cambridge: Polity, 2004).Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Stuart Clark, ‘Introduction’, in Stuart Clark (ed.), Languages of Witchcraft: Narrative, Ideology and Meaning in Early Modern Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001), p. 10.Google Scholar
  14. 25.
    David Margolick, Beyond Glory: Joe Louis vs. Max Schmeling, and a World on the Brink (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005), p. 158.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Thomas C. Reeves, The Life and Times of Joe McCarthy: a Biography (New York: Stein and Day, 1982), p. 589.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Ian Buruma, ‘The Indiscreet Charm of Tyranny’, New York Review of Books, 52, 8, 12 May (2005), p. 35.Google Scholar
  17. 32.
    Yorkshire Post, 28 July 1984, quoted in John Campbell, Margaret Thatcher. Volume II: the Iron Lady (London: Jonathan Cape, 2003), p. 361.Google Scholar
  18. 33.
    Roger Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), p. 18.Google Scholar
  19. 35.
    Speech to the Senate on 20 February 1950, in Joseph McCarthy, Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950–1951 (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951), p. 8,Google Scholar
  20. quoted in Seymour J. Mandelbaum, The Social Setting of Intolerance: the Know-Nothings, the Red Scare, and McCarthyism (Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1964), pp. 142–3.Google Scholar
  21. 36.
    Sir John Harington, Epigrams (1618), book 4, number 5, quoted in Angela Partington (ed.), The Dictionary of Quotations, 4th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 326, 12.Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    C. A. R. Crosland, The Conservative Enemy (London: Jonathan Cape, 1962).Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    Quoted in Richard Jackson, Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), p. 170.Google Scholar
  24. 41.
    George Orwell, ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941), The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, ed. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus, 4 vols (Harmondsworth: Penguin (1970 Penguin edn) 1968), p. 95.Google Scholar
  25. 42.
    Quoted in Robert Alan Goldberg, Enemies Within: the Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001), p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 43.
    By the end of the twentieth century such attacks, like political messages as a whole, could be transmitted with speed and ease via the internet. http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/aa110399.htm, accessed 27 May 2006. The evidence, and narratives, of such phenomena are frequently elusive. See, for instance, Mary Hershberger, Jane Fonda’s War: a Political Biography of an Anti-War Icon (New York: New Press, 2005);Google Scholar
  27. Rick Perlstein, ‘Operation Barbarella’, London Review of Books, 27, 2, 17 November (2005), pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
  28. 44.
    Craig Unger, House of Bush, House of Saud: the Secret Relationship Between the World’s Two Most Powerful Dynasties (London: Gibson Square, 2004).Google Scholar
  29. 46.
    Simon Haxey, Tory M.P. (London: Victor Gollancz, 1939), p. 245.Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  31. 50.
    Idith Zertal, Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 52.
    Gilles Kepel, Jihad: the Trail of Political Islam, translated by Anthony F. Roberts (London: Tauris, 2002).Google Scholar
  33. 53.
    George Simmel, Conflict & the Web of Group-Affiliations, translated by Kurt H. Wolff and Reinhard Bendix (New York: Free Press, 1964), p. 43.Google Scholar
  34. 54.
    Tom Gallagher, Glasgow: the Uneasy Peace (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987), p. 17.Google Scholar
  35. 55.
    Giles Radice, Friends and Rivals: Crosland, Jenkins and Healey (London: Abacus, 2003), p. 132.Google Scholar
  36. 57.
    Bernard Donoughue and G. W. Jones, Herbert Morrison: Portrait of a Politician (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973).Google Scholar
  37. 59.
    Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Raids and Reconstructions: Essays in Politics, Crime and Culture (London: Pluto Press, 1973), p. 61.Google Scholar
  38. 60.
    George Schwab, The Challenge of the Exception: an Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt between1921 and 1936, 2nd edition (Berlin: Greenwood Press, 1970), pp. 53–4.Google Scholar
  39. 61.
    Giovanni Sartori, ‘The Essence of the Political in Carl Schmitt’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 1, January (1989), pp. 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 62.
    Richard Hofstadter, The Paranoid Style in American Politics and other Essays (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  41. 63.
    Diarmaid MacCulloch, Reformation: Europe’s House Divided 1490–1700 (London: Allen Lane, 2003), pp. 244–6, 420–1, and passim.Google Scholar
  42. 65.
    Jacques Le Goff, The Birth of Europe, translated by Janet Lloyd (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), p. 84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rodney Barker 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The London School of Economics and Political ScienceUK

Personalised recommendations