Advertisement

Accounts of Enmity in Politics and Government

Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

‘Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.’2 With a few changes, the statement of President George W. Bush of the United States could be that of any one of a broad sweep of political rhetoricians who in their account of the world divide it into friends and enemies, and for whom there is no grey area, and no third or uncommitted position, between themselves and their opponents. If he who says organisation says oligarchy, it sometimes seems as if he who says politics says enmity. If that is so, the new millennium is entirely typical. The rhetoric of politics at the start of the twenty-first century is filled with images of danger and hostility which provide both illustrations and organising themes for accounts of the world. Political leaders of every persuasion and in every type of regime warn of the dangers facing their subjects and followers: terrorism, religious fanaticism, economic imperialism, military adventurism, moral corruption, the collapse of social order, riot, crime, and depravity. Nations, faiths, parties, and movements say loudly and clearly who their enemies are, so much so that their own character seems overshadowed by that of those whom they depict as threatening them. The evils of Western materialism have a more prominent role in such narratives than the virtues of Eastern spiritually informed material reticence, while the menace of religious fundamentalism takes up more space in the agenda of propaganda than the benefits of rational caution and humanistic respect.

Keywords

Political Action Political Life Political Enquiry Normal Politics Potential Enemy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    W. H. Auden, In Memory of W. B. Yeats, III, in Philip Larkin (ed.), The Oxford Book of Twentieth Century English Verse (London: Oxford University Press, 1975), p. 419.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Steven Shapin, The Scientific Revolution (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 6.
    3 June 1986, Quoted National Council for Civil Liberties, Stonehenge. A Report into the Civil Liberties Implications of the Events Relating to the Convoys of Summer 1985 and 1986 (London: National Council for Civil Liberties, 1986), p. 1.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Siân Nicholas, The Echo of War: Home Front Propaganda and the Wartime BBC, 1939–49 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), p. 180.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Stephen Tomkins, John Wesley: a Biography (Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2003), p. 58.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Paul Hoggett, ‘A Reply to Christopher Bluth’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 4, November (2005), p. 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 13.
    Paul Hoggett, ‘Iraq: Blair’s Mission Impossible’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 3, August (2005), p. 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 14.
    Christoph Bluth, ‘“Iraq: Blair’s Mission Impossible”: a Rejoinder to Paul Hoggett’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 4, November (2005), pp. 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 15.
    Max Weber, Economy and Society, ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, 2 vols (London: University of California Press, 1978), p. 952.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Magnali Christi, Americana OR The Ecclesiastical History of New England ([1702] New York: Russell & Russell, 1967, volume 2, p. 558),Google Scholar
  11. quoted in David E. Stannard, American Holocaust: the Conquest of the New World (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 114.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Kristen Renwick Monroe, ‘Identity and Choice’, in Kenneth R. Hoover (ed.), The Future of Identity: Centennial Reflections on the Legacy of Erik Erikson (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2004), p. 82.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    Wolfgang Behringer, Witches and Witch-hunts: a Global History (Cambridge: Polity, 2004), p. 74.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    Stuart Clark, Thinking with Demons: the Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. vii.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    William Shakespeare, Othello, Act 1, Scene 3 (London: Methuen, 1965 edn).Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Extremes: the Short Twentieth Century1914–1991 (London: Michael Joseph, 1994), p. 4.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just, ‘Framing Terrorism’, in Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just (eds), Framing Terrorism: the News Media, the Government and the Public (London: Routledge, 2003), p. 15.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    There is a considerable literature on the psychology of enmity, which falls outside the scope of this discussion. It can be approached, for instance, via Ofer Zur, ‘The Love of Hating: the Psychology of Enmity’, History of European Ideas, 13, 4 (1991), pp. 345–69,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. or Catarina Kinnvall, ‘Globalization, Identity, and the Search for Chosen Traumas’, in Kenneth R. Hoover (ed.), The Future of Identity: Centennial Reflections on the Legacy of Erik Erikson (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2004).Google Scholar
  20. I have not dealt with any of this literature. The body of work is immense, and a book such as Joseph H. Berke, Stella Pierides, Andrea, Sabbadini (eds), Even Paranoids Have Enemies: New Perpecitves on Paranoia and Persecution (London & New York: Routledge, 1998) is no more than an initial toehold on the mass of coverage. The discussion ranges from broad accounts of collective psychology to studies of small group or individual action where it can be observed that ‘sharing a dislike of a third party with a nonintimate may be a particularly powerful bonding agent in the formative phases of friendship’ (Jennifer K. Bosson, Amber B. Johnson, and Kate Niederhoffer, ‘Interpersonal Chemistry Through Negativity: Bonding by Sharing Negative Attitudes about Others’, Personal Relationships, 13, 2, June (2006), pp. 135–50, p. 140.Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    Anne H. Coulter, Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (New York: Crown Forum, 2003), p. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rodney Barker 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The London School of Economics and Political ScienceUK

Personalised recommendations