Skip to main content

Religion and Reflexivity: The Paralysis of a Theological Imagination

  • Chapter
Sociology in Theology
  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

In an assessment of religion and spirituality in England, Barley (2006: xi) stated: ‘Christian Britain is a thing of the past and yet it remains the backdrop to everyday life.’ The disconnection between folk memory of religion and practice has never been more explicitly cast. Thus, looking at the state of religion in English society, one is faced with a paradox. The Census for England and Wales, 2001, showed that 72 per cent of the population identified themselves as Christian, that is 37.3 million. Much ink has been spilt working out this perplexing figure that surprised almost all commentators. What was the Christianity to which so many subscribed and yet so few practised, as expressed in weekly or even monthly attendance? The Census figures and the relatively small number who practise in terms of weekly church attendance seemed to justify Davie’s notion (2000: 177–80) of religion as a form of vicarious memory, where the few worship on behalf of the self-disaffiliated many.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Kieran Flanagan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flanagan, K. (2007). Religion and Reflexivity: The Paralysis of a Theological Imagination. In: Sociology in Theology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287457_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics