Skip to main content

The Origins of the UN Presence in Cyprus

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Republic of Cyprus, as founded in 1960, lasted just three years. On 21 December 1963 the political tensions that had been developing between the Greek and Turkish communities over the previous months, if not years, finally erupted into violence. From the earliest stages the governments of the United Kingdom, Greece and Turkey became concerned with these events. These three countries, collectively known as the Guarantor Powers, had all been given a role in maintaining the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus under the terms of the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee and for each of them violence in Cyprus was a threat to their interests. For the United Kingdom any serious disturbance on the island threatened the lives of the large number of British citizens living there and had the potential to proliferate in such a way as to present a challenge to the existence of the strategically important Sovereign Base Areas that had been ceded to Britain upon Cypriot independence in 1960. For Turkey, the domestic political situation was such that any attacks on the Turkish Cypriots would necessitate some form of military intervention. This in turn threatened to embroil Greece. Thus the events taking place on the island posed a risk to the integrity NATO’s entire southern flank. The three Guarantor Powers approached the Government of Cyprus on 25 December 1963 with a proposal to institute a tripartite peacekeeping force in an attempt to prevent further conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Although the Soviet Union welcomed the appointment of U Thant as the third Secretary-General of the UN following the death of Dag Hammarskjold in September 1961, they still held a suspicion of the office. There are a number of reasons why the Soviet Union had been hostile towards the two previous Secretaries-General of the UN Trygve Lie and Dag Hammarskjold. The main reasons, however, seem to devolve from their approaches to the UN operations in Korea, in the case of Lie, and the Congo, in the case of Hammarskjold. In both cases they had expressed concern at the amount of responsibility that the Secretary-General seemed to be developing; power which they believed should lie solely with the Security Council. Some picture of the problem as seen from the UN can be found in Trygve Lie, In Pursuit of Peace, London: Macmillan, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brian Urquhart, A Life in peace and War, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987; and

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brian Urquhart, Hammarskjold, London: W.W. Norton, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. George Ball, The Past has Another Pattern, London: W.W. Norton, 1982, p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an account written by the Greek Representative see Dimitri Bitsios, Cyprus: the Vulnerable Republic, Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The French representative, Roger Seydoux, following the vote, explained why France had abstained by saying that his Government was concerned at the degree of responsibility being assumed by the Secretary-General which, in turn, reduced the responsibilities of the Security Council. Although it was pointed out that this was not a personal criticism of U Thant, the French Representative did not regard the responsibilities contained in the resolution as forming a precedent. It should be mentioned, however, that Seydoux was known to be harsh in his attitude to U Thant and that U Thant in his turn was often unable to deal with the Frenchman often choosing to ‘give way rather than stand and fight.’ Brian Urquhart, Ralph Bundle: an American Life, New York: W.W. Norton, 1993, p. 378.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 James Ker-Lindsay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ker-Lindsay, J. (2001). The Origins of the UN Presence in Cyprus. In: Richmond, O.P., Ker-Lindsay, J. (eds) The Work of the UN in Cyprus. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287396_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics