Skip to main content
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

Bringing investment services supervision to the centre of the EU will raise significant questions of the ultimate institutional structure and operation of the single regulator. Accordingly, a few comments shall be made in this chapter on the trend towards consolidation and conglomeration of financial services and on issues stemming from their supervision, particularly within the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Goodhart, C. et al., Financial Regulation: Why, How and Where Now? (London: Routledge, 1998) 143.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In Europe alone, more than 1500 new cases of domestic groups engaged in banking, securities and insurance activities have been reported since 1995; see European Commission, Progress on Financial Services: 2nd Report (COM(2000) 336, 31 May 2000) 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carton de Tournai, G., ‘A Few Reflections on Financial Conglomerates and Their Supervision’, in Wymeersch, E. (ed.), Further Perspectives in Financial Integration in Europe (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994) 66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A recent proposal seeks to introduce specific prudential legislation for financial conglomerates and takes the initial steps to align the directives for homogeneous financial groups and for financial conglomerates in order to ensure a minimum equivalency in their treatment; see European Commission, Proposal for a Directive on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC, 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the Parliament and the Council (COM(2001) 213 final, 24 April 2001, hereinafter ‘Conglomerates Directive’).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joint Forum, Supervision of Financial Conglomerates (December 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Economic and Financial Committee, Report on Financial Stability (EFC/ECFIN/240/00, 8 April 2000, ‘Brouwer Report’).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Briault, C., The Rationale for a Single National Financial Services Regulator (FSA Occasional Paper Series No. 2, May 1999) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meister, E., How should regulatory and supervisory responsibilities be shared among the national functional regulators? (Lecture held at the Multinational Banking Seminar, New York, 9 June 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Briault, op. cit., note 13, 5. See also, Briault, C., Revisiting the Rationale for a Single National Financial Services Regulator (FSA Occasional Paper Series No. 16, February 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Although the FSMA has some 433 sections and 22 schedules, the final enactment provides only the framework, with a large part of the substance of the financial reform left to secondary legislation. For the features of the legislation, see Alcock, A., The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: A Guide to the New Law (Bristol: Jordans, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blair, M. et al., Blackstone’s Guide to the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 (London: Blackstone Press, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, H., ‘Law and Financial Regulation’ (1993) 4–5 JIFM 193;

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacNeil, I., ‘The Future for Financial Regulation: The Financial Services and Markets Bill’ (1999) 62 MLR 725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See Walker, G., International Banking Regulation: Law, Policy and Practice (London: Kluwer Law International, 2001) 247. The new agency was originally only referred to as New RO but was subsequently named the Financial Services Authority at its formal launch on 28 October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For an analysis on the history of the Bank of England, see Sir Clapham, J., The Bank of England: A History (Cambridge: The University Press, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giuseppi, J., The Bank of England: A History from its Foundation in 1694 (London: Evans Bros, 1966);

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schooner, H. and Taylor, M., ‘Convergence and Competition: The Case of Bank Regulation in Britain and the United States’ (1999) 20 Michigan Journal of International Law 595, 606 et seq. The central argument of Schooner and Taylor is the proposition that, even in the presence of globalised financial markets and the opportunities for rule competition brought in their wake, the financial regulatory system of the United Kingdom continues to be shaped for the most part by its prior history.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Large, A., Report to the Chancellor on the Reform of the Financial Regulatory System (July 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Davies, H., Why Regulate? (Henry Thornton Lecture, City University, 4 November 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thieffry, G., ‘After the “Lamfalussy” Report: The First Step towards a European Securities Commission (ESC)?’, in Andenas, M. and Avgerinos, Y., Financial Market Supervision in Europe: Towards a Single Regulator? (London: Kluwer, forthcoming 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Lastra, R., Central Banking and Banking Regulation (London: Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics, 1996) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Fender, I. and von Hagen, J., Central Bank Policy in a More Perfect Financial System (ZEI Policy Paper B03, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goodhart, C. and Schoenmaker, D., ‘Should the Functions of Monetary Policy and Banking Supervision be Separated?’ (1995) 4 Oxford Economic Papers 539, 545.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Louis, J.V. et al., Banking Supervision in the European Community (Brussels: University of Brussels, 1995) 56.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Smits, R., The European Central Bank: Institutional Aspects (The Hague: Kluwer, 1997) 334;

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moloney, N., EC Securities Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 893.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Di Giorgio, G. and Di Noia, C., Designing Institutions for Financial Stability: Regulation and Supervision by Objective for the Euro Area (mimeo, November 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lannoo, K., ‘Challenges to the structure of financial supervision in the EU’ (CEPS, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor, M., Twin Peaks: A Regulatory Structure for the New Century (London: Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation, December 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Di Giorgio, G., Di Noia, C. and Piatti, L., ‘Financial Market Regulation: The Case of Italy and a Proposal for the Euro area’, in Andenas, M. and Avgerinos, Y. (eds), Financial Market Supervision in Europe: Towards a Single Regulator? (London: Kluwer, forthcoming 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. ECB, The Role of Central Banks in Prudential Supervision (March 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Yannis V. Avgerinos

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avgerinos, Y.V. (2003). Consolidating Financial Supervision. In: Regulating and Supervising Investment Services in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286870_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics