Abstract
After the Great War the concept of ‘war memorials’ extended far beyond traditional stone and metal statues. There was a move towards utilitarian monuments that were ‘other than stone and mortar’1 with parks, hospitals and homes for the elderly and wounded compared to traditional stone arches, crosses cenotaphs and obelisks.2 This chapter locates and analyses the hospitals, wards and rest homes around the world that commemorated Cavell. There was a high degree of sameness in the form that medical memorials took, and this was often an example of networks whereby the peripheries copied the metropolis. British and European initiatives were followed by colonial elites who sought to create civic and national identities out of a connection with the imperial centre. Organizing medical monuments was a gendered project, and transnationally medical memorials for Cavell depended upon organized elite women with the necessary respect and resources to fulfil their wishes. As well as being able to run large fund-raising campaigns, women needed to occupy key positions of influence on hospital boards. They were able to draw upon their fund-raising skills learnt during the war, and had a practical sense of what utilities were needed. There was a new-found confidence in these women’s endeavours.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Katie Pickles, Female Imperialism and National Identity: Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2002), chapter 6, ‘Other than stone and mortar’: war memorials, memory and imperial knowledge’, pp. 108–121.
A. Whittick, War Memorials (London: Country Life Ltd., 1946), p. 1 writes that Canadians favoured non-traditional memorials. But Ken Inglis, Sacred Places: War Memorials in the Australian Landscape (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, The Miegunyah Press, 1998), p. 144 argues for ‘monumen-tality over use’ in Australia, and also South Africa, Britain and New Zealand. See also C. Maclean and J. Phillips, The Sorrow and the Pride: New Zealand War Memorials (Wellington: Government Printer, 1990).
A. King, Memorials of the Great War in Britain: The Symbolism and Politics of Remembrance (Oxford and New York: Berg, 1998), p. 65.
NIWM 15592, Birkenhead News, Saturday 12 October 1918, n.p.
See L. J. Rupp, Worlds of Women: The Making of an International Women’s Movement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), and M. Sinha, D. Guy and A. Woollacott (eds) Feminisms and Internationalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).
Katie Pickles, ‘Colonial Counterparts: the First Academic Women in Anglo-Canada, New Zealand and Australia, Women’s History Review, 10, 2 (2001), 273–297.
Julia Bush, ‘Edwardian Ladies and the ‘Race’ Dimensions of British Imperialism’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 3, (1998), 277–289.
A. Woollacott, ‘Inventing Commonwealth and Pan-Pacific Feminism: Australian Women’s International Activism in the 1920s-30s’, Gender and History, 10:3, (1998) 425–448, 95, and Woollacott, A. Woollacott, To Try Her Fortune in London: Australian Women, Colonialism And Modernity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001). See also F. Paisley, ‘Citizens of their World: Australian Feminism and Indigenous Rights in the World Context, 1920s and 1930s’, Feminist Review, (April 1998), pp. 66–84 and F. Paisley, ‘Cultivating Modernity: Culture and Internationalism in Australian Feminism’s Pacific Age’, Journal o f Women’s History, 14: 3 (2002), pp. 105–132.
G. W. Russell, New Zealand Today (Wellington: Minister of Internal Affairs and Public Health, 1919), p. 283.
See C. Strange, Toronto’s Girl Problem: the Perils and Pleasures of the City, 1880–1930 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995), and J. Smart, ‘Feminists, Flappers and Miss Australia: Contesting the Meanings of Citizenship, Femininity and Nation in the 1920s’, Journal of Australian Studies, 71 (2002), 1–15.
A. Bingham, Gender, Modernity, and the Popular Press in Inter-War Britain (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 91.
C. Brazil, B. Davison and J. Tremayne, ‘The Marks-Hirschfeld Medical Museum and the Royal Brisbane Hospital GNA Inc. Nursing Museum Royal Children’s Heritage Trail’, Royal Children’s Hospital, Herston. Saturday 10th May 1997, 1.00pm-4.30pm, p. 12.
See K. Pickles ‘Kiwi Icons and the Re-settlement of New Zealand as Colonial Space’, New Zealand Geographer, 58:2 (2002), 5–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Katie Pickles
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pickles, K. (2007). Homes and Hospitals: Locating Medical Memorials. In: Transnational Outrage. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286085_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286085_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54053-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28608-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)