Anti-Science and Organic Daydreams

  • Michael Grant


In this reading, taken from Newton’s Sleep (1995), Tallis takes up the theme of the response of intellectuals to science. He begins from the fact of pain. There is a connection that he detects between the attitude of certain intellectuals to suffering and the attitude cultivated by the Church. There is, however, little spiritual content in unrelieved toothache. Death from neonatal tetany — in which the baby spends its first and only week of life convulsing to death — is even less compelling as an example of the spiritual benefits to be obtained from physical suffering. He cites a remark of C.P. Snow’s, one of those who, as Tallis sees it, understood the issues at stake here, to the effect that the ‘tragic’ sense of life opens a moral trap. It is all too easy to believe that, because human life is tragic, it does not matter if two-thirds of the world are starving to death. Pursuing his theme in relation to AIDS, Tallis notes that Susan Sontag, a ‘leading intellectual’ if ever there was one, has questioned the whole idea of a disease characterised by immune failure and has tried to suggest that AIDS is ‘really’ a ‘product of definition and construction’. Scientists, on the other hand, have worked out the mechanism of the virus and developed treatments and strategies which may in time lead to a vaccine. The problem that certain humanists have with science is that, while it has dramatically diminished human helplessness before the non-human universe, it seems to have done so at the cost of diminishing our communion with the vital forces of nature. Tallis challenges this assumption, which emerged with the Romantics and continues to enjoy a wide following today.


Wishful Thinking Total Domination Magic Thinking Physical Suffering World Picture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Martin Seymour-Smith, Guide to Modern World Literature (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1974), p. xviii.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peter Medawar, The Hope of Progress (London: Methuen, 1972).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    J. Chin, in ‘Current and future dimensions of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in women and children’, Lancet, 336, 1990, pp. 221–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    G.C. Schild and E.J. Stott, ‘Where are we now with vaccines against AIDS?’, British Medical Journal, 306, 1993, pp. 947–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 8.
    Rainer Friedrich’s critique of the postmodernists: ‘The Deconstructed Self in Artaud and Brecht’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, xxvi, 1990, pp. 282–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 10.
    George Steiner, Real Presences (London: Faber & Faber, 1989).Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Lewis Wolpert, in The Unnatural Nature of Science (London: Faber & Faber, 1992, p. 43).Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    See J.R. von Salis, Rainer Maria Rilke: The Years in Switzerland, translated by N.K. Cruickshank (London: The Hogarth Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    See, for example, Rupert Sheldrake, The Rebirth of Nature: New Science and the Revival of Animism (London: Rider, 1993).Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Richard Westfall’s Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    John Gribbins and Paul Davies, The Matter Myth (London: Macmillan, 1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Raymond Tallis 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Grant
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutherford CollegeThe University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations