Abstract
With a witch-hunting reputation to live down, Nixon’s chances of winning in 1968 were regarded as ‘dim’. Both Edward Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey were in favour of the draft and Nixon’s narrow victory has been partly attributed to Nixon’s conversion to Friedman’s long-held advocacy of an all-volunteer army. This was the marriage of ideas and vested interests, transmitted to Nixon via the head of his research department, Martin Anderson (Anderson 1993, 173–4; Friedman 1977, 12; Friedman and Friedman 1998, 377–81; Safire 1975, 77). Shortly after taking office, Nixon was again exposed to Friedman’s proposal to take the wind out of the anti-Vietnam war rhetoric by announcing a timetable for the phasing out of conscription. Defense Secretary Melvin Laird was an advocate of Friedman’s position. Nixon scribbled: ‘Get Laird’s comment on this intriguing proposal’ (cited by Reeves 2001, 51, 77).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Robert Leeson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leeson, R. (2003). Flexible Exchange Rates as a Vehicle for Nixon’s Re-election. In: Ideology and the International Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286023_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286023_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50898-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28602-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)