Policy Paradigms and Long-Term Care: Convergence or Continuing Difference?

  • Virpi Timonen

Abstract

This chapter analyses policy paradigms in the area of long-term care for older people in France, Spain, England, Sweden and Germany2 since the mid-1990s. The chapter identifies three paradigms that do not have much in common and that have not converged in any essential respects. While the statist paradigm (to which Sweden continues to adhere) and the familialist/individualist paradigm (to which care policies in England and Spain belong) have experienced only minor changes, the ‘state pays, others provide’ paradigm to which France and Germany adhere has undergone extensive changes. Contrary to some other recent accounts of the development of social care systems, this chapter argues that there are no signs of significant convergence towards universalisation, individualisation and formalisation in the long-term care policy paradigms in the five countries analysed here. Despite the absence of significant convergence between the paradigms, there are two common themes that the long-term care policies in all five countries share, namely the emphasis on homecare (domiciliary or ‘community’ care) and the increased inclination to turn to the market as a source of care (marketisation).

Keywords

Europe Income Arena OECD Renes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Policy maps and interviews from the WRAMSOC project submitted in 2003 (authors: France: Bruno Palier and Lou Mandin; Spain: Luis Moreno et al; Germany: Andreas Aust and Frank Bönker; UK: Peter Taylor-Gooby, Trine Larsen, Anne Daguerre; Finland/Sweden: Virpi Timonen; Switzerland). These are available on the Internet at www.kent.ac.uk/wramsocGoogle Scholar
  2. Alber, Jens (1995) ‘A framework for the comparative study of social services’, Journal of European Social Policy 5(2): 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anttonen, Anneli and Jorma Sipilä (1996) ‘European Social Care Services: Is It Possible to Identify Models?’ Journal of European Social Policy 6(2): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anttonen, Anneli, John Baldock and Jorma Sipilä (2003) The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Baldock, John and A. Evers (1992) ‘Innovations in Care for the Elderly: The Cutting Edge of Change for Social Welfare Systems. Examples from Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom’, Ageing and Society 12(3): 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, Peter (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning and the state — the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3), pp. 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirk, S. and C. Glendinning (1998) ‘Trends in Community care and Patient Participation: Implications for the Roles of Informal Carers and Community Nurses in the UK’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28: 370–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, Jane (1992) ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy 2(3), 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morel, Nathalie (2003) Providing coverage against new social risks in Bismarkian welfare states: the case of long-term care, Paper presented at the ESPAnet conference, Copenhagen, 13–15 November 2003.Google Scholar
  11. OECD (1996) Caring for frail elderly people: policies in evolution. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. Österle, August (2001) Equity Choices and Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Allocating resources and burdens in Austria, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Pierson, Paul (Ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  14. Socialstyrelsen (2002) Äldre — Va[o]rd och omsorg a[o]r 2001. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor-Gooby, Peter (Ed.) (2004) New Risks and New Welfare in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Timonen, Virpi (2004) ‘New Risks — Are They Still New for the Nordic Welfare States?’ in Peter Taylor-Gooby (Ed.) New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Trydega[o]rd, Gun-Britt (2000) Tradition, Change and Variation. Past and Present Trends in Public Old-Age Care. Stockholm Studies of Social Work No. 16. Stockholm University, Department of Social Work.Google Scholar
  18. Wistow, Gerald (1996) Social Care Markets: Progress and Prospects. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Virpi Timonen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virpi Timonen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations