Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility: an Institutional Perspective

  • Chapter
Corporate Governance and International Business

Part of the book series: The Academy of International Business ((AIB))

Abstract

Over the past two decades much has been written on the subject of corporate social responsibility (CSR). From an international business perspective, several papers in a recent focused issue of theJournal ofInternational Business Studies (JIBS) reviewed some of the firm-specific organization and strategic managerial issues and challenges posed by them (Eden et al., 2006). A more multifaceted and interdisciplinary approach is taken by van Tulder and van der Zwart (2006). They view CSR as part of a business—society management nexus, which has become more varied and complex as a result of globalization.1 The ethical implications of CSR have been addressed by several scholars, such as Sethi (2003a, 2003b), van Marrewijk (2003), Kolk and van Tulder (2004) and Garriga and Mele (2004). In this chapter, we shall attempt to integrate these alternative approaches to CSR by relating each to the ‘big picture’ now emerging in international business (IB) scholarship. In so doing we shall suggest that this can best be done by embracing a more institutional perspective on the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abrahams, S. (2004). Regulating corporations: a resource guide ( Geneva: UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: the pathological pursuit of profit and power ( London: Constable and Robinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise ( Basingstoke: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (2001). ‘The ethical wealth of nations’. Journal of Business Ethics, 31 (1): 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Dufee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics ( Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. O. (1995). ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (ed.), (2003). Making globalization good ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2007a). ‘A new zeitgeist for international business and scholarship’. European Journal ofInternational Management, 1 (4): 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2007b). Space, location and distance in IB activities: a changing scenario. Reading and Rutgers Universities (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. and Lundan, S. (2008). The multinational enterprise and theglobal economy ( Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2005). ‘A survey of corporate social responsibility’. 22 January: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. Hillman, A., Rodriguez, P. and Siegel, D. (eds) (2006). ‘Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption and corporate social responsibility’. Journal ofInternational Business Studies, 37 (6): 733–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1983). ‘The social responsibility of business’. In T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie (eds), Ethical theory and business ( New Jersey: Prentice Hall ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E. and Mele, D. (2004). ‘Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory’. Journal of Business Ethics, 53 (1–2): 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. M. (2000). Fighting the wrong way: antiglobal activists and multinational enterprises ( Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue ( London: Institute of Economic Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J. (2000). ‘The institutional environment for international business’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 162: 334–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W. and Allen, D. B. (2006). ‘Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches’. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 838–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, P. (2007). ‘G8’s prioritization of IPR enforcement a positive step’. The Times: Intellectual Property Supplement (21 February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G. and Ruggie, J. G. (1999). ‘Global markets and legitimacy: the case of the “global compact”’. Transnational Corporations, 9 (3): 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. and van Tulder, R. (2004). ‘Ethics in international business: multinational approaches to child labor’. Journal of World Business, 39 (6): 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. and van Tulder, R. (2005). ‘Setting new global rules: TNCs and codes of conduct’. Transnational Corporations, 14 (3): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, C. C. Y. and Tadesse, S. (2006). ‘The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption’, Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 767–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: lessons from new science ( London: Allen Lane).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S. and Boyacigiller, N. A. (2007). ‘What we talk about when we talk about “global mindset”: managerial cognition in multinational corporations’. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 231–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, E. and Nicholas, S. (2003). ‘New institutional economics: an organizing framework’. In J. Cantwell and R. Narula (eds), International business and the eclectic paradigm, pp. 47–73 ( London amp; New York: Routledge ).

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001). ‘Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective’. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 117–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. (2002). ‘Institutions and international business: a theoretical overview’. International Business Review, 11 (6): 635–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000). The OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises: revision 2000 ( Paris: OECD ).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001). Making codes of corporate conduct work: management control systems and corporate responsibility ( Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J. (1997). ‘Happiness and economic performance’. Economic Journal, 107: 1815–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T. (2005). Institutions, industrial upgrading and economic performance in Japan ( Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. (2004). ‘(Corporate) governance, (shareholder) value and (sustainable) economic performance’. Corporate Governance, 12 (2): 210–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrick, D., Subramanian, A. and Trebbi, F. (2004). ‘Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development’. Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 131–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A. (2005). ‘Assessing government policies for business competitiveness in emerging market economies: an institutional approach’. In R. Grosse (ed.), International business and government relations in the 21st century, pp. 395–420 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A. and Behrman, J. N. (2000). ‘The institutional imperatives of globalization’. Global Focus, 12 (1): 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, I. (2006). Corruption: the world’s big C ( London: Institute of Economic Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (2003a). ‘Globalization and the good corporation: a need for pro-active existence’. Journal of Business Ethics, 43 (1–2): 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (2003b). Setting global standards: guidelines for creating codes of conduct in multinational corporations ( Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, T. and Zadek, S. (2002). Corporate responsibility and the competitive advantage of nations ( Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre for Accountability).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1999a). World investment report 1999: foreign direct investment and the challengeof development (New York and Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1999b). The social responsibility of transnational corporations ( New York and Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2001). Social responsibility. UNCTAD series of issues in international investment agreements ( New York and Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2006). World investment report 2006: FDI from developing and transition economies–implications for development ( New York and Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2002). The human rights responsibilities of companies ( New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNRISD (2004). Corporate social responsibility and development: towards a new agenda ( Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P. (2005). ‘Rethinking business regulation from self regulation to social control’. Technology, Business and Society, no. 15 ( Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development ).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. (2003). ‘Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion’. Journal of Business Ethics, 44 (2): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tulder, R. and van der Zwart, A. (2006). International business–society management: linking corporate responsibility and globalisation ( London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webley, S. and LeJeune, M. (2005). Corporate use of codes of ethics: 2004 survey ( London: Institute of Business Ethics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (2000). ‘The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead’. Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D. and Shenkar, O. (2002). ‘Institutional distance and the MNE’. Academy of Management Review, 27 (4): 608–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 John H. Dunning

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunning, J.H. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: an Institutional Perspective. In: Strange, R., Jackson, G. (eds) Corporate Governance and International Business. The Academy of International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285743_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics