Skip to main content

Difference, ‘Multi’ and Equality

  • Chapter
The Plural States of Recognition

Part of the book series: Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series ((CAL))

Abstract

A politics of recognition of difference has to begin, sociologically, with the fact of negative ‘difference’: with alienness, inferiorization, stigmatization, stereotyping, exclusion, discrimination, racism, and so on; but also the senses of identity that groups so perceived have of themselves. The two together are the key datum for multiculturalism. The differences at issue are those perceived both by outsiders or group members — from the outside in and from the inside out — to constitute not just some form of distinctness but a form of alienness or inferiority that diminishes or makes difficult equal membership in the wider society or polity. There is a sense of groupness in play, a mode of being, but also subordination or marginality, a mode of oppression, and the two interact in creating an unequal ‘us–them’ relationship.2

This chapter is based on Chapter 3 of Modood (2007). I am grateful to Polity Press for the reuse of some of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amos, V. and Parmar, P. (1984) ‘Challenging Imperial Feminism’, Feminist Review, Vol. 17, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H. (1996) Fractured Identities: Changing Patterns of Inequality, Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, S. and Taylor, J. (2004) ‘Ethnicity, Educational Attainment and the Transition from School’, The Manchester School, Vol. 72, No. 3, 313–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, K. (2002) Rethinking Muslim Women and the Veil, London, International Institute for Islamic Thought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carby, H. (1982) ‘White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood’, in Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in Seventies Britain, London, Hutchinson, pp. 212–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain (CMEB) (2000) The Future of Multiethnic Britain, London, Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, H., Tyers, C., Modood, T. and Hilage, J. (2004) ‘Why the Difference? A Closer Look at Minority Ethnic Students and Graduates’, Research Report, No. 552, Department for Education and Skills, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903) The Souls of Black Folk, Chicago, A. C. McClurg & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1964) The Division of Labour in Society, trans. G. Simpson, New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, G. (1996) The Hispanic Nation: Culture, Politics and the Constructing of Identity, New Jersey, Secacusus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition, London, Verso.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gayle, V., Berridge, D. and Davies, R. (2002) ‘Young People’s Entry into Higher Education: Quantifying Influential Factors’, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2000) On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. and Cheung, S. Y. (2007) Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets, Oxford, Oxford University Press for the British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivisto, P. (2005) Incorporating Diversity: Rethinking Assimilation in a Multicultural Age, Boulder, CO, Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, J. (2005) The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. and Laurent, E. (2006) ‘France Shows Its True Colours’, Boston Globe, 3 June, <http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/06/03/franceshows_its_true_colors/>.

  • Loury, G., Modood, T. and Teles, S. (eds) (2005) Ethnicity, Social Mobility and Public Policy in the US and UK, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (ed.) (1999) Critical Multiculturalism, London, Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (1988) ‘“Black”, Racial Equality and Asian Identity’, New Community, Vol. 14, No. 3, 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (1994) ‘Political Blackness and British Asians’, Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 859–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2004) ‘Capitals, Ethnic Identity and Educational Qualifications’, Cultural Trends, Special Issue on Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion, guest ed. T. Bennett and M. Savage, Vol. 13(2), No. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2005a) Multicultural Politics: Racism, Ethnicity and Muslims in Britain, University of Minnesota Press and University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2005b) ‘Ethnicity and Political Mobilisation in Britain’, in G. Loury, T. Modood and S. Teles (eds), Ethnicity, Social Mobility and Public Policy in the US and UK, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 457–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2006) ‘The Liberal Dilemma: Integration or Vilification?’ OpenDemocracy website, 8 February, <http://www.opendemocracy.net/conflictterrorism/liberal_dilemma_3249.jsp>.

  • Modood, T. (2007) Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea, Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., Nazroo, J., Smith, P., Virdee, S. and Beishon, S. (1997) Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage — Fourth National Survey of Ethnic Minorities, London, Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Hansen, R., Bleich, E., O’Leary, B. and Carens, J. (2006) ‘The Danish Cartoon Affair: Free Speech, Racism, Islamism and Integration’, International Migration, Vol. 44, No. 5, 3–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Metcalf, H. and Virdee, S. (1998) ‘British Asian Entrepreneurs: Culture and Opportunity Structures’, in P. Taylor-Gooby (ed.), Choice and Public Policy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, H. (2004) ‘British Muslims a Success Story in 2004’, IslamOnline.net, 28 December, http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2004-12/28article06.shtml>.

  • O’Donnell, M. (2007) ‘“We” Need Human Rights Not Nationalism “Lite”: Globalisation and British Solidarity’, Ethnicities, Vol. 7, No. 22, 248–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M. and H. Winant (1986) Racial Formation in the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2000) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2004) ‘Redistribution or Recognition: A Misguided Debate’, in S. May, T. Modood and J. Squires (eds), Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–213.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2005) ‘British Commitments’, Prospect, September, <http://prospectmagazine.co.uk/article_details.php?search_term=parekh&id=7003&issue=509&AuthKey=51e3e0b168fd1b98c34d1cb9f08e4fe9>.

  • Phillips, A. (1999) Which Equalities Matter? Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L. (2005) ‘New Destinations? Assessing the Post-migration Social Mobility of Minority Ethnic Groups in England and Wales’, Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 39, No. 6, 697–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. and Zhou, M. (1993) ‘The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants among Post-1965 Immigrant Youth’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 530, 74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seglow, J. (2003) ‘Theorising “Recognition”‘, in B. Haddock and B. Sutch (eds), Multiculturalism, Identity and Rights, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. (2001) ‘Comparing Minorities’ Ethnic Options’, Ethnicities, Vol. 1, No. 1, 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism and ‘The Politics of Recognition’, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Michel Seymour

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Modood, T. (2010). Difference, ‘Multi’ and Equality. In: Seymour, M. (eds) The Plural States of Recognition. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285569_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics