Skip to main content

Dynamics and Challenges of Innovation in Germany

  • Chapter
The Innovation for Development Report 2009–2010

Abstract

The economy of the Federal Republic of Germany, labeled a ‘growth miracle’ in the 1950s, emerged as the growth engine of Europe throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Despite the slowdown of growth rates during the 1980s, it remained Europe’s strongest and most innovative economy (Harhoff, 2008), making its unique brand of a ‘social market economy’ a role model, combining technological innovativeness, international openness, and industrial competitiveness with an extensive welfare system. Since the 1990s and 2000s, however, the various challenges posed by economic globalization, technological change, locational competition, demographic pressures, persistent mass unemployment, and the fiscal burdens of reunification with East Germany have exercised a pressure for institutional reform. Indeed, current German policy discourse is preoccupied with the need for infusing more entrepreneurial drive into the economy at large, in line with the formation of a knowledge-based economy. This reform orientation also affects the debate on innovation: the primary task is the restructuring of Germany’s innovation system in the direction of an entrepreneurial approach that combines institutional flexibility in the research and educational systems with promotion of entrepreneurship in both start-ups and established firms, while providing adequate risk capital and manpower. Thus, innovation in Germany is a reflection of more extensive institutional changes which are transforming Germany’s postwar coordinated ‘social market economy’ into an institutional hybrid whose shape is not yet clear—apart from becoming decidedly more entrepreneurial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Annesley, C. 2004. Postindustrial Germany: Services, Technological Transformation and Knowledge in Unified Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. 2007. The Entrepreneurial Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., I. Grilo, and A. R. Thurik. 2007. “Explaining Entrepreneurship and the Role of Policy: A Framework.” In Audretsch, D. B., I. Grilo, and A. R. Thurik (eds.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 1–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. 2002. “Entrepreneurhips, innovation and growth: The David-Goliath symbiosis.” The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures 7:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belitz, H. and T. Kirn. 2008. „Deutlicher Zusammenhang zwischen Innovationsfáhigkeit und Einstellungen zu Wissenschaft und Technik im internationalen Vergleich.” In DIW Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol.2: Nationale Innovationssysteme im Vergleich, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, pp. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buenstorf, G. and J. P. Murmann. 2005. “Ernst Abbe’s scientific management: theoretical insights from a nineteenthcentury dynamic capabilities approach.” Industrial and Corporate Change 14(4):543–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L., C. Gomez, and J. Spencer. 2000. “Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena.” Academy of Management Journal 43(5):994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, S., M. Lehrer, and D. Soskice. 1999. “Can HighTechnology Industries Prosper in Germany? Institutional Frameworks and the Evolution of the German Software and Biotechnology Industries” Industry and Innovation 6(1):5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czada, R. 2005. „Die neue deutsche Wohlfahrtswelt: Sozialpolitik und Arbeitswelt im Wandel.” In S. Lütz und R. Czada (eds.). Wohlfahrtsstaat – Transformation und Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: VS. pp.127–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., and S. A. Johan. 2008. „Preplanned exit strategies in venture capital.” European Economic Review 52(7):1209–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. 2009. Embedded Entrepreneurship: The Institutional Dynamics of Innovation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI). 2009. “Gutachten zu Forschung” Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfáhigkeit 2009, Berlin: EFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt). 2007. National accounts: Germanys interrelations with the global economy—An analysis of imports and exports 2007. Wiesbaden: Destatis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. 2002. “Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—Complementarity and economic growth.” Research Policy 31(2):191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. and L. Soete. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, (3rd ed.), London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. F., M. Porter, and S. Stern. 2002. “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.” Research Policy 31:899–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, R. and M. Teubal. 1997. “Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems.” In C. Edquist (ed.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London: Frances Pinter. pp. 342–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., U. Schmoch, and B. Breitschopf. 2008. „Perspektiven des deutschen Innovationssystems: Technologische Wettbewerbsfáhigkeit und wirtschaftlicher Wandel.” In B. Bláttel-Mink und A. Ebner (eds.). Innovationssysteme: Technologie, Institutionen und die Dynamik der Wettbewerbsfahigkeit. Wiesbaden: VS. pp.249–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. and D. Soskice. 2001. „An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.1–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. and D. Soskice. 2000. “The End of the Innovation Economy?” In Harding, R. and W. E. Paterson (eds.). The Future of the German Economy: An End to the Miracle? Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. 2008. „Innovation, Entrepreneurship und Demographie.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9 (Special Issue):46–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, M. 2005. “The Renewal of Regional Capabilities: Experimental Regionalism in Germany.” Research Policy. 34:739–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T., L. Lindsey, and M. Puri. 2008. “Building Relationships Early: Banks in Venture Capital.” Review of Financial Studies 21(2):513–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., S. Wuchty, and B. Uzzi. 2008. “Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science.” Science 322:1259–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R. and H. Prange. 2004. “The Reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems: The Example of German Biotechnology.” Research Policy 33:395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, O. 1993. The National System for Technical Innovation in Germany, in R. Nelson (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, K-U. 1997. “Germany” In Graham, E.M. and J. D. Richardson (eds.), Global Competition Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp.115–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legler, H., O. Krawczyk, and M. Leidmann. 2009. FuE-Aktivitaten von Wirtschaft und Staat im internationalen Vergleich. Hannover: NIW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Á. (ed.). 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C., K. Schoors, and Y. Yafeh. 2005. “Sources of funds and investment activities of venture capital funds: Evidence from Germany, Israel, Japan and the United Kingdom.” Journal of Corporate Finance 11(3):586–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Á., B. Johnson, E. S. Andersen, and B. Dalum. 2002. “National systems of production, innovation and competence building.” Research Policy 31:213–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., B. Smith, K. Seawright, and E. Morse. 2000. “Cross-Cultural Cognition and the Venture Creation Decision.” Academy of Management Journal 43(5):974–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. 2004. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murmann, J. P. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (ed.) 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. R. and R. Rosenberg. 1994. “American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry.” Research Policy 23(3):323–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Compendium of Patent Statistics. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. Databasefor Structural Analysis. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. and K. Pavitt. 1994. “National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, and How They Might Be Measured and Compared.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(1):77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, WW., K.W. Koput, L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1):116–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prange, H. 2005. Wege zum Innovationsstaat: Globalisierung und der Wandel nationaler Forschungsund Technologiepolitiken. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammer, C., W. Polt, J. Egeln, G. Licht, and A. Schibany. 2004. Internationale Trends der Forschungsund Innovationspolitik: Fallt Deutschland zurück? Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A., P. Aghion, G. Bertola, M. Hellwig, J. Pisani-Ferry, D. Rosati, J. Viñals, and H. Wallace. 2003. “An Agenda for a Growing Europe: Making the EU Economic System Deliver.” Report of an Independent High-Level Study Group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/ ndbtext/innovation/sapirreport.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles. New York: McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwienbacher, A. 2008. “Venture capital investment prac tices in Europe and the United States” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 22(3):195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, H. 2005. The German Economy: Beyond the Social Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. 1997. “German Technology Policy, Innovation, and National Institutional Frameworks” Industry and Innovation 4(l):75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. 2009. Re-Forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykvová, T. 2006. “How do investment patterns of independent and captive private equity funds differ? Evidence from Germany.” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 20(4):399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitols, S. and L. Engelhardt. 2005. “National Institutions and High Tech Industries: A Varieties of Capitalism Perspective on the Failure of Germany’s ‘Neuer Markt.’” Discussion Paper SP II 2005–03. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A. and G. Redding. 2009. “Culture, meaning, and institutions: Executive rationale in Germany and Japan.” Journal of International Business Studies 40(5):859–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2009. DoingBusiness 2009 Report. Palgrave Macmillan, Available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Liming. 2008. “German export to remain world’s biggest in 2008: Difficult year ahead.” China View. Available at: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008–12/19/content 10528088.htm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Augusto López-Claros

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ebner, A., Täube, F.A. (2010). Dynamics and Challenges of Innovation in Germany. In: The Innovation for Development Report 2009–2010. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285477_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics