Abstract
The economy of the Federal Republic of Germany, labeled a ‘growth miracle’ in the 1950s, emerged as the growth engine of Europe throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Despite the slowdown of growth rates during the 1980s, it remained Europe’s strongest and most innovative economy (Harhoff, 2008), making its unique brand of a ‘social market economy’ a role model, combining technological innovativeness, international openness, and industrial competitiveness with an extensive welfare system. Since the 1990s and 2000s, however, the various challenges posed by economic globalization, technological change, locational competition, demographic pressures, persistent mass unemployment, and the fiscal burdens of reunification with East Germany have exercised a pressure for institutional reform. Indeed, current German policy discourse is preoccupied with the need for infusing more entrepreneurial drive into the economy at large, in line with the formation of a knowledge-based economy. This reform orientation also affects the debate on innovation: the primary task is the restructuring of Germany’s innovation system in the direction of an entrepreneurial approach that combines institutional flexibility in the research and educational systems with promotion of entrepreneurship in both start-ups and established firms, while providing adequate risk capital and manpower. Thus, innovation in Germany is a reflection of more extensive institutional changes which are transforming Germany’s postwar coordinated ‘social market economy’ into an institutional hybrid whose shape is not yet clear—apart from becoming decidedly more entrepreneurial.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Annesley, C. 2004. Postindustrial Germany: Services, Technological Transformation and Knowledge in Unified Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Audretsch, D. B. 2007. The Entrepreneurial Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Audretsch, D. B., I. Grilo, and A. R. Thurik. 2007. “Explaining Entrepreneurship and the Role of Policy: A Framework.” In Audretsch, D. B., I. Grilo, and A. R. Thurik (eds.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 1–16.
Baumol, W. 2002. “Entrepreneurhips, innovation and growth: The David-Goliath symbiosis.” The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures 7:1–10.
Belitz, H. and T. Kirn. 2008. „Deutlicher Zusammenhang zwischen Innovationsfáhigkeit und Einstellungen zu Wissenschaft und Technik im internationalen Vergleich.” In DIW Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol.2: Nationale Innovationssysteme im Vergleich, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, pp. 49–64.
Buenstorf, G. and J. P. Murmann. 2005. “Ernst Abbe’s scientific management: theoretical insights from a nineteenthcentury dynamic capabilities approach.” Industrial and Corporate Change 14(4):543–78.
Busenitz, L., C. Gomez, and J. Spencer. 2000. “Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena.” Academy of Management Journal 43(5):994–1003.
Casper, S., M. Lehrer, and D. Soskice. 1999. “Can HighTechnology Industries Prosper in Germany? Institutional Frameworks and the Evolution of the German Software and Biotechnology Industries” Industry and Innovation 6(1):5–24.
Czada, R. 2005. „Die neue deutsche Wohlfahrtswelt: Sozialpolitik und Arbeitswelt im Wandel.” In S. Lütz und R. Czada (eds.). Wohlfahrtsstaat – Transformation und Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: VS. pp.127–54.
Cumming, D., and S. A. Johan. 2008. „Preplanned exit strategies in venture capital.” European Economic Review 52(7):1209–41.
Ebner, A. 2009. Embedded Entrepreneurship: The Institutional Dynamics of Innovation. London and New York: Routledge.
Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI). 2009. “Gutachten zu Forschung” Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfáhigkeit 2009, Berlin: EFI.
Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt). 2007. National accounts: Germanys interrelations with the global economy—An analysis of imports and exports 2007. Wiesbaden: Destatis.
Freeman, C. 2002. “Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—Complementarity and economic growth.” Research Policy 31(2):191–211.
Freeman, C. and L. Soete. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, (3rd ed.), London: Pinter.
Furman, J. F., M. Porter, and S. Stern. 2002. “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.” Research Policy 31:899–933.
Galli, R. and M. Teubal. 1997. “Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems.” In C. Edquist (ed.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London: Frances Pinter. pp. 342–70.
Grupp, H., U. Schmoch, and B. Breitschopf. 2008. „Perspektiven des deutschen Innovationssystems: Technologische Wettbewerbsfáhigkeit und wirtschaftlicher Wandel.” In B. Bláttel-Mink und A. Ebner (eds.). Innovationssysteme: Technologie, Institutionen und die Dynamik der Wettbewerbsfahigkeit. Wiesbaden: VS. pp.249–66.
Hall, P. A. and D. Soskice. 2001. „An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.1–68.
Harding, R. and D. Soskice. 2000. “The End of the Innovation Economy?” In Harding, R. and W. E. Paterson (eds.). The Future of the German Economy: An End to the Miracle? Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 83–99.
Harhoff, D. 2008. „Innovation, Entrepreneurship und Demographie.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9 (Special Issue):46–72.
Heidenreich, M. 2005. “The Renewal of Regional Capabilities: Experimental Regionalism in Germany.” Research Policy. 34:739–57.
Hellmann, T., L. Lindsey, and M. Puri. 2008. “Building Relationships Early: Banks in Venture Capital.” Review of Financial Studies 21(2):513–41.
Jones, B. F., S. Wuchty, and B. Uzzi. 2008. “Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science.” Science 322:1259–62.
Kaiser, R. and H. Prange. 2004. “The Reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems: The Example of German Biotechnology.” Research Policy 33:395–408.
Keck, O. 1993. The National System for Technical Innovation in Germany, in R. Nelson (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–57.
Kühn, K-U. 1997. “Germany” In Graham, E.M. and J. D. Richardson (eds.), Global Competition Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp.115–49.
Legler, H., O. Krawczyk, and M. Leidmann. 2009. FuE-Aktivitaten von Wirtschaft und Staat im internationalen Vergleich. Hannover: NIW.
Lundvall, B.-Á. (ed.). 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Frances Pinter.
Mayer, C., K. Schoors, and Y. Yafeh. 2005. “Sources of funds and investment activities of venture capital funds: Evidence from Germany, Israel, Japan and the United Kingdom.” Journal of Corporate Finance 11(3):586–608.
Lundvall, B.-Á., B. Johnson, E. S. Andersen, and B. Dalum. 2002. “National systems of production, innovation and competence building.” Research Policy 31:213–31.
Mitchell, R., B. Smith, K. Seawright, and E. Morse. 2000. “Cross-Cultural Cognition and the Venture Creation Decision.” Academy of Management Journal 43(5):974–93.
Motta, M. 2004. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murmann, J. P. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, R. (ed.) 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nelson R. R. and R. Rosenberg. 1994. “American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry.” Research Policy 23(3):323–48.
OECD. 2007. Compendium of Patent Statistics. Paris: OECD.
—. 2008. Databasefor Structural Analysis. Paris: OECD.
Patel, P. and K. Pavitt. 1994. “National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, and How They Might Be Measured and Compared.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(1):77–95.
Powell, WW., K.W. Koput, L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1):116–45.
Prange, H. 2005. Wege zum Innovationsstaat: Globalisierung und der Wandel nationaler Forschungsund Technologiepolitiken. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Rammer, C., W. Polt, J. Egeln, G. Licht, and A. Schibany. 2004. Internationale Trends der Forschungsund Innovationspolitik: Fallt Deutschland zurück? Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Sapir, A., P. Aghion, G. Bertola, M. Hellwig, J. Pisani-Ferry, D. Rosati, J. Viñals, and H. Wallace. 2003. “An Agenda for a Growing Europe: Making the EU Economic System Deliver.” Report of an Independent High-Level Study Group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/ ndbtext/innovation/sapirreport.pdf
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles. New York: McGrawHill.
Schwienbacher, A. 2008. “Venture capital investment prac tices in Europe and the United States” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 22(3):195–217.
Siebert, H. 2005. The German Economy: Beyond the Social Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Soskice, D. 1997. “German Technology Policy, Innovation, and National Institutional Frameworks” Industry and Innovation 4(l):75–96.
Streeck, W. 2009. Re-Forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tykvová, T. 2006. “How do investment patterns of independent and captive private equity funds differ? Evidence from Germany.” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 20(4):399–418.
Vitols, S. and L. Engelhardt. 2005. “National Institutions and High Tech Industries: A Varieties of Capitalism Perspective on the Failure of Germany’s ‘Neuer Markt.’” Discussion Paper SP II 2005–03. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
Witt, M. A. and G. Redding. 2009. “Culture, meaning, and institutions: Executive rationale in Germany and Japan.” Journal of International Business Studies 40(5):859–85.
World Bank. 2009. DoingBusiness 2009 Report. Palgrave Macmillan, Available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org
Wu, Liming. 2008. “German export to remain world’s biggest in 2008: Difficult year ahead.” China View. Available at: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008–12/19/content 10528088.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Augusto López-Claros
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ebner, A., Täube, F.A. (2010). Dynamics and Challenges of Innovation in Germany. In: The Innovation for Development Report 2009–2010. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285477_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285477_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-23966-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28547-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)