Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series ((NPSE))

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

The case of the two Imia islets (in Greek) or Kardak rocks (in Turkish) is a more recent addition to the already heavy Aegean agenda. It came to the fore in 1996 (see Chapter 9). At the time, Turkey raised the wider issue of the existence of ‘grey zones’ in the Aegean, that is, islets and rocks in the eastern Aegean whose status as to sovereignty was ‘undetermined’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Constantin P. Economides (1997), ‘Les ilots d’Imia dans la mer Egée: un differend créé par la force’, Revue générale de droit international publique, 101, 2, pp. 321–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Economides (1997), ‘Quelques commentaries sur l’article de Mr. H. Pazarcι’, Revue générale de droit international publique, 101, 2, pp. 379–89

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krateros M. Ioannou (1997), ‘The Greek Territorial Sea’, in Theodore C. Kariotis (ed.), Greece and the Law of the Sea (The Hague: Kluwer), pp. 140–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Angelos M. Syrigos (1998), The Status of the Aegean Sea According to International Law (Athens and Brussels: Sakkoulas, Bruylant), pp. 358–60, 403–19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stylianos Politis (2001), ‘The Legal Regime of the Imia Islands in International Law’, Revue hellénique de droit international, 54, 1, pp. 353–64

    Google Scholar 

  6. Constantinos Svolopoulos and Evanthis Hatzivassiliou (2001), ‘Turkey’s Acceptance of the Demarcation Line in the Dodecanese Area, 1953’, Revue hellénique de droit international, 54, 2, pp. 517–26. See also ‘Imia Case’ and ‘Grey Zones’, under ‘Turkish Claims’, in ‘Foreign Policy-Turkey’, http://www.mfa.gr. Dates accessed 7 September 2007 and 25 March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hüseyin Pazarcι (1997), ‘Différend gréco-turc sur le statut de certains ilots et rochers dans la mer Egée: une reponse à Mr. C.P. Economides’, Revue générale de droit international publique, 101, 2, pp. 353–89

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yüksel Inan and Sertaç H. Başeren (1996), ‘The Troubled Situation of the Aegean Territorial Waters’, Hellenic Studies, 4, 2, pp. 64–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ali Kurumahmut (1998), Ege’de Temel Sorun, Eğemenliği Tartişmalι Adalar [The Basic Dispute in the Aegean: Islands of Disputed Sovereignty] (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erdem Deng (1999), ‘Disputed Islets and Rocks in the Aegean Sea’, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 29, pp. 131–55

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yücel Acer (2003), The Aegean Maritime Disputes and International Law (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 19–22, 32–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yüksel Inan and Yücel Acer (2003), ‘The Aegean Disputes’ (Ankara: Foreign Policy Institute), pp. 6–9, 25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ali Kurumahmut and Sertaç Hami Başeren (2004), The Twilight Zones in the Aegean. (Un)Forgotten Turkish Islands (Ankara: Publications of Turkish Historical Society), VII, 220, pp. 1, 13–33

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deniz Bölükbaşi (2004), Turkey and Greece. The Aegean Disputes. A Unique Case in International Law (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited), pp. 823–30, 913–5; Kemal Başlar (2007), ‘Two facets of the Aegean Sea Dispute: de lege lata and de lege ferenda’, pp. 18–20, http://www.turkishweekly.net/pdf/aegean_sea.pdf. Date accessed 10 December 2007. The website of the Turkish foreign ministry was very detailed in the first part of the 2000s, but from 2006 onwards the issue has been downgraded. See ‘A Brief View of the Kardak Crisis’, ‘Legal Background of the Kardak Crisis in a Nutshell’ and ‘The Kardak Dispute’, under ‘Foreign Policy-Greece’, http://www.mfa.gov.tr. Date accessed 5 December 2003. For 2006 onwards, see ‘Islands, Islets and Rocks in the Aegean Which Where [sic] not Ceded to Greece by International Treaties and Maritime Boundaries’ and ‘The Conflict Claims over the Small Islets and Rocks in the Aegean and the Crisis’, under ‘Foreign Policy-Greece’, http://www.mfa.gov.tr. Dates accessed 20 October 2006 and 20 February 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gulden Ayman (2001), ‘The Kardak (Imia) Crisis and Turkish-Greek Relations’, Hellenic Studies, 9, 2, pp. 56, 59, 61

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reşat Arιm (2001), Foreign Policy Concepts. Conjuncture, Freedom of Action, Equality (Ankara: Foreign Policy Institute), p. 26. More generally, see Kurumahmut, op. cit.; and Bölükbaşi, op. cit., pp. 65–9, 823–30 and passim.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Alexis Heraclides

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heraclides, A. (2010). Imia/Kardak and the Grey Zones. In: The Greek-Turkish Conflict in the Aegean. New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283398_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics