Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series ((NPSE))

  • 361 Accesses

Abstract

Demilitarisation aims to prevent armed conflicts that may be triggered from border regions. Examples include the 15 year demilitarisation of Thrace between Greece, Turkey and Bulgaria agreed in 1923 at Lausanne or the short-lived demilitarisation of five small Italian islands and the partial demilitarisation of Sicily and Sardinia adopted by the Paris Peace Treaty (1947).1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Natalino Ronzitti (1989), ‘The Aegean Demilitarization, Greek-Turkish Relations and Mediterranean Security’, in The Aegean Issues: Problems and Prospects (Ankara: Foreign Policy Institute), pp. 295–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christos Rozakis (1988), ‘To diethnes nomiko kathestos tou Aigaiou’ [The International Legal Regime of the Aegean], in Alexis Alexandris et ah, Oi ellinotourkikes scheseis, 1923–1987 [Greek-Turkish Relations, 1923–1987] (Athens: Gnosi, 1988), pp. 428–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deniz Bölükbaşi (2004), Turkey and Greece. The Aegean Disputes. A Unique Case in International Law (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited), pp. 750–4, 779–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rozakis, op. cit., pp. 434–5; Byron Theodoropoulos (1988), Oi Tourkoi kai emeis [The Turks and Us] (Athens: Fitrakis), pp. 294–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.P. Economides (1981), ‘La prétendue obligation de demilitarisation de l’ile de Lemnos’, Revue héllenique de droit international, pp. 12–13 Resolution: Golbal

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.P. Economides (1989), ‘To nomiko kathestos ton ellinikon nison tou Aigaiou’ [The Legal Regime of the Greek Islands in the Aegean’, in Hüseyin Pazarcι and C.P. Economides, To kathestos apostratikopioisis ton nison tou anatolikou Aigaiou [The Demilitarisation Regime of the Islands the Eastern Aegean] (Athens: Gnosi), pp. 146–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See previous note and the following: Christos L. Rozakis (1989), ‘Oi ellinotourkikes scheseis: i nomiki diastasi’ [Greek-Turkish Relations: The Legal Dimension], in D. Constas and Ch. Tsardanidis (eds), Sychroni elliniki exoteriki politiki [Contemporary Greek Foreign Policy] (Athens: Sakkoulas), pp. 57–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Philippe Drakidis (1983), ‘La démilitarisation du Dodécanèse’, Défence Nationale (April), pp. 81–2 Resolution: Golbal; Drakidis (1984), ‘Le statut de démilitarisation de certaines iles grécques’, Défence Nationale (August-September), pp. 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hüseyin Pazarci (1985), ‘Has the Demilitarized Status of the Aegean Islands as Determined by the Lausanne and Paris Treaties Changed?’, Turkish Review Quarterly Digest (Winter), pp. 24–45 Resolution: Golbal

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pazarcι (1986), Doğu Ege Adalarιmιn Askerden Arιndιrlmuş [The Demiltarisation Regime of the Islands of the Eastern Aegean] (Ankara: Ankara Universitesi Yayιnlarι), also translated in Greek, Pazarcι and Economides, op. cit., pp. 58–92; Bölükbaşi, op. cit., pp. 722–6, 733, 760–81

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yücel Acer (2003), The Aegean Maritime Disputes and International Law (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 23–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yüksel Inan and Yücel Acer (2003), ‘The Aegean Disputes’ (Ankara: Foreign Policy Institute), pp. 11, 13–15. See also ‘Militarization of Eastern Aegean Islands’ in ‘The Aegean Problems’ and ‘The Demilitarization Status of the Eastern Aegean Islands’, in ‘Background Note on Aegean Dispute’, under ‘Foreign Policy-Greece’, http://www.mfa.gov.tr. Date accessed 16 December 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Economides, ‘To nomiko kathestos ton ellinikon nison tou Aigaiou’, op. cit., pp. 166–71; Rozakis, ‘To diethnes nomiko kathestos tou Aigaiou’, op. cit., pp. 429–30, 436–8; Yannis A. Stivachtis (1999), ‘The Demilitarisation of the Greek Eastern Aegean Islands: The Case of the Eastern Aegean and Dodecanese Islands’, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 29, pp. 105–30. See also ‘The Greek Positions on the Military Status of the Islands of the Eastern Aegean’, under ‘Foreign Policy-Turkey’, http://www.mfa.gr. Date accessed 4 December 2003; and ‘Military Status of Aegean Islands’, in ‘Differences’, under ‘Foreign Policy-Turkey’, http://www.mfa.gr. Date accessed 7 December 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pazarcι, op. cit., pp. 98–102; Şükrü S. Gürel (1993b), ‘Turkey and Greece: A Difficult Aegean Relationship’, in Canan Balkιr and Allan M. Williams (eds), Turkey and Europe (London: Pinter Publishers), p. 168

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duat Aksu (2002), ‘Preservation of Demilitarized Status of the Aegean Islands for the National Security of Turkey’, Turkish Review of Balkan Studies, 7, pp. 112–15; D. Bölükbaşi, op. cit., pp. 781–98, 805.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Suat Bilge, ‘The Situation in the Aegean’, in The Aegean Issues, op. cit., pp. 67–80; Ihsan Gürkan, ‘Certain Defence Issues in the Aegean Sea Basin: A Turkish View’, in The Aegean Issues, op. cit., pp. 113–31; Şükrü Elekdağ (1996), ‘2½ War Strategy’, Perceptions: foumal of International Affairs, I, 1 (March-May), pp. 33–57

    Google Scholar 

  17. Asian Gündüz (2001), ‘Greek-Turkish Disputes: How to Resolve Them?’, in Dimitris Keridis and Dimitrios Triantaphyllou (eds), Greek-Turkish Relations in the Era of Globalization (Herndon: Brassey’s), pp. 83–4, 87–90; Aksu, op. cit., pp. 107–33

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mümtaz Soysal (2004), ‘The Future of Turkish Foreign Policy’, in Lenore G. Martin and Dimitris Keridis (eds), The Future of Turkish Foreign Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mustafa Kibaroğlu (1999), ‘Turkey’s Deterrent’, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 55, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Hüseyin Pazarcι (1997), ‘Différend gréco-turc sur le statut de certains ilots et rochers dans la mer Egée: une reponse à Mr. C.P. Economides’, Revue générale de droit international publique, 101, 2, p. 370

    Google Scholar 

  21. Erdem Deng (1999), ‘Disputed Islets and Rocks in the Aegean Sea’, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 29, pp. 129–55

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ali Kurumahmut and Sertac Hami BaÅŸeren (2004), The Twilight Zones in the Aegean. (Un) Forgotten Turkish Islands (Ankara: Publications of Turkish Historical Society), pp. 3, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  23. On the security dilemma see for example Robert Jervis (1978), ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 30, 2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. For the security dilemma in the Aegean, see Mustafa Aydιn and Kostas Ifantis (eds) (2004), Turkish-Greek Relations: The Security Dilemma in the Aegean (London: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  25. and Panayotis J. Tsakonas (ed.) (2001), Études Helléniques/Hellenic Studies, issue entitled ‘Is the Greek-Turkish Conflict a Security Dilemma?’, 9, 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Alexis Heraclides

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heraclides, A. (2010). Demilitarisation. In: The Greek-Turkish Conflict in the Aegean. New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283398_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics