Skip to main content

WTO and the Environmental Movement: On the Path to Participatory Governance?

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims at exploring the emerging forms of participation of NGOs in the World Trade Organization (WTO), based on the example of the relations between the environmental movement and the WTO. Although most suggestions concerning how to democratize global governance have not yet seen the light of day in practice, numerous reforms and attempts have been undertaken. Therefore, it is important to explore the response by practitioners to the articulated criticism of lacking accountability, transparency, and representation directed at international organizations in general, and the WTO in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alcock, F. (2008) “Conflicts and Coalitions Within and Across the ENGO Community,” Global Environmental Politics, 8 (4): 66–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apleton, A. (1999) “Shrimp/Turtle: Untangling the Nets,” Journal of International Economic Law, 2: 477–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M. and E. Corell (2008) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. (2001) “The Rising Tide of Green Unilateralism in World Trade Law: Options For Reconciling the Emerging North-South Conflict,” Journal of World Trade, 35 (3): 421–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, P. (2009) Misadventures of the Most Favored Nations: Clashing Egos, Inflated Ambitions, and the Great Shambles of the World Trading System (New York: Public Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buira, A. (ed.) (2005) Reforming the Governance of the IMF and the World Bank (London: Anthem Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, S. and B. Van Dyke (1996) In Search of Sound Environmental Trade Policy: A Critique of Public Participation in the WTO (Washington, DC: CIEL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boström, M. and M. Klintman (2008) Eco-Standards, Product Labelling and Green Consumerism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charnowitz, S. (2000) “Opening the WTO to Non-Governmental Interests,” Fordham International Law Journal, 18: 173–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R., S. Reccia and R. Rohrschneider (2003) “The Environmental Movement and Modes of Political Action,” Comparative Political Studies, 36: 743–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damian, M. and J.-C. Graz (2001) “The World Trade Organization, the Environment, and the Ecological Critique,” International Social Science Journal, 53 (170): 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, A. (2003) “The WTO… Will Meet Somewhere, Sometime: And We Will Be There,” paper prepared for the project “VOICES: The Rise of Nongovernmental Voices in Multilateral Organisations,” Ottawa: Institut Nord-Sud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M-L. and S. Quack (eds) (2003) Globalization and Institutions (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerberg, K. and W.M. Lafferty (eds) (1998) From the Earth Summit to Local Agenda 21 Working Towards Sustainable Development (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, A. (1996) “Openness and the WTO, a Draft IISD Paper” (Winnipeg: IISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. (1997) Why the WTO Needs Environmental NGOs (Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004a) EU Submission: The EU and the WTO: Improving the Functioning of the WTO (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004b) “Environment and Governance: What Role for the WTO,” presentation by Rupert Schlegelmilch, Head of Unit, European Commission DG Trade, Geneva WTO Symposium, 26 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (1996a) Non paper by the European Community to the Committee on Trade and Environment, 23 July 1996 (Brussels: European Union).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (1996b) Non-paper by the European Community to the Committee on Trade and Environment, 19 February 1996 (Brussels: European Union).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feichtinger, J. and M. Pregernig (2005) “Participation and/or/versus Sustainability? Tensions Between Procedural and Substantive Goals in Two Local Agenda 21 Processes in Sweden and Austria,” European Environment, 15 (4): 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. (ed.) (2000) The Third Force. The Rise of Transnational Civil Society (Washington DC: Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace (2002) Greenpeace Comments and Annotation on the WTO Doha Ministerial Declaration (Berlin: Greenpeace).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace, Adelphi Research, and FOE (2004) “Is the WTO the Only Way?” briefing paper by S. Pfahl, with S. Lovera and K. Bizzarri (Berlin, Amsterdam, Brussels: Greenpeace, Adelphi Research, and FOE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. and H. Wagenaar (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howse, R. and K. Nicolaïdis (2003) “Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?” Governance, 16 (1): 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. (2005) “Contested Boundaries: Ambiguity and Creativity in the Evolution of German Codetermination,” in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2001) “The WTO `Constitution’ and Proposed Reforms: Seven ‘Mantras’ Revisited,” Journal of International Economic Law, 4 (1): 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jah, V. (2002) “Environmental Regulation and the WTO,” in B. Hoekman, A. Mattoo and P. English (eds) Development, Trade and the WTO (Washington, DC: EBRD/World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jawara, F. and A. Kwa (2003) Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Negotiations (London and New York: Zed Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (2004) “Defining Accountability Up: The Global Economic Multilaterals,” Governance and Opposition, 39: 132–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, P. and C. Mudde (2003) “Rethinking Civil Society,” Democratization, 10 (3): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2006) “A Qualitative Analysis of the WTO’s Role on Trade and Environment Issues,” Global Environmental Politics, 6 (1): 102–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2000) “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society, 29: 507–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marceau, G. and M. Stillewell (2001) “Practical Suggestions for Amicus Curiae Briefs before WTO Adjudicating Bodies,” Journal o fInternational Economic Law, 4 (1): 155–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., J. Boli, G.M. Thomas and F.O. Ramirez (1997) “World Society and the Nation State,” American Journal of Sociology, 103: 144–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanz, P. and J. Steffek (2004) “Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere,” Government and Opposition, 39: 314–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2004) “The WTO and the Environment: Its Past Record Is Better than Critics Believe, but the Future Outlook Is Bleak,” Global Environmental Politics, 4 (3): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991) “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes,” Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersmann, E.-U. (ed.) (2005) Reforming the World Trading System: Legitimacy, Efficiency, and Democratic Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000) “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, 94: 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripinsky, S. and P. Van Den Bossche (2007) NGO Involvement in International Organizations: A Legal Analysis (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, R. and R. Dalton (2002) “A Global Network? Transnational Cooperation among Environmental Groups,” Journal of Politics, 64 (2): 510–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A. (2002) “Institution-Building from Below and Above: The European Community in Global Environmental Politics,” in J. Andrew (ed.) Environmental Policy in the European Union: Actors, Institutions and Processes (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2002) “Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance,” Global Governance, 8: 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2004) “The WTO and Civil Society,” in S. McGuire and B. Hocking (eds) Trade Politics (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2007) “Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance,” Journal of Civil Society, 3 (3): 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A., R. O’Brien and M. Williams (1999) “The WTO and Civil Society,” Journal of World Trade, 33 (1): 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, G. (2002) “The Nexus of Law and Politics: The WTO’s Committee of Trade and Environment,” in R. Steinberg (ed.) The Greening of Trade Law: International Trade Organizations, Trade and the Environment, and Environmental Issues (Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, G. (2003) “How to Make the WTO Dispute Settlement System Work for Developing Countries: Some Proactive Developing Country Strategies,” in ICTSD, Towards a Development-Supportive Dispute Settlement System in the WTO, Resource Paper No. 5 (Geneva; ICTSD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., C. Chatfield and R. Pagnucco (eds) (1997) Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. and P. Nanz (2007) “Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance,” in J. Steffek, C. Kissling and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J., C. Kissling and P. Nanz (2007) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S., K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds) (1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcomb, A. (1968) Constructing Social Theories (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. and K. Thelen (eds) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, G. (2006) “Management by Results: Its Origin and Development in the Swedish State,” International Public Management Journal, 9: 399–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SUNS (1998) Transparency of WTO Decision Making Ducked, Report July 20, http://www.sunsonline.org (accessed November 3, 2009: Third World Network)

    Google Scholar 

  • SUNS — South-North Monitor (1990) Environment and Sustainable Development, http://www.sunsonline.org/trade/areas/environm/10200090.htm (accessed November 3, 2009: Third World Network).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, P., J. Bhagwati, K. Botchwey, N. FitzGerald, K. Hamada, J.H. Jackson, C. Lafer and T. de Montbrial (2004) The Future o f the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium (Geneva: World Trade Organization).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2003) “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Research,” in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlin, A. (2009) “Which Characteristics of Civil Society Organizations Support What Aspects of Democracy? Evidence from Post-Communist Latvia,” International Political Science Review, 30: 271–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bossche, P. (2008) “NGO Involvement in the WTO: A Comparative Perspective,” Journal of International Economic Law, 11 (4): 717–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1999) “The World Trade Organization, Social Movements and ‘Democracy’,” in A. Taylor and G. Thomas (eds) Global Trade and Social Issues (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2001) “Trade and the Environment: A Decade of Stalemate,” Global Environmental Politics, 1 (4): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. and L. Ford (1999) “The World Trade Organization, Social Movements and Global Environmental Management,” Environmental Politics, 8 (1): 268–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. and A. Narlikar (2001) “Governance and the Limits of Accountability: The WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank,” International Social Science Journal, 53 (107): 569–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1996) Guidelines for Arrangements on Relations with Non-Governmental Organizations (Geneva: WTO, WT/L/162, 23 July).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2001) Symposium report 2001 (Geneva: WTO).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2006) Public Forum, Program and Report, http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_forum_e/forum06_e.htm (accessed November 3, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2007) Public Forum, Program and Report, http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_forum2007_e/public_forum07_e.htm (accessed November 3, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2008) Public Forum, Program and Report, http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_forum08_e/public_forum08_e.htm (accessed November 3, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2009a) Public Forum, Program, http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_forum09_e/programme_e.htm (accessed December 18, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2009b) NGO Position Papers Received by the WTO Secretariat, http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/ngo_e/pospap_e.htm (accessed July 7, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Åsa Casula Vifell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vifell, Å.C. (2010). WTO and the Environmental Movement: On the Path to Participatory Governance?. In: Jönsson, C., Tallberg, J. (eds) Transnational Actors in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283220_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics