Skip to main content

Explaining Patterns of Transnational Participation: The Role of Policy Fields

  • Chapter

Abstract

Within the range of concrete proposals for democratizing international governance, enhanced civil society participation has attracted a remarkable amount of scholarly interest.1 The literature that deals with this democratizing potential has grown exponentially over the last ten years (for recent overviews, see Greenwood, 2007; Kohler-Koch and Finke, 2007; Omelicheva, 2009; Scholte, 2004). Much of it is concerned with governance in the European Union (EU), but also global organizations such as the United Nations (UN), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are studied extensively. Some scholars have sought to put the numerous pieces of the puzzle together and to provide an overview of participatory trends in a more comparative fashion (Steffek et al., 2008). The set of volumes in which this text appears is certainly the most ambitious attempt so far to take stock of these developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albin, C. (1999) “Can NGOs Enhance the Effectiveness of International Negotiation?” International Negotiation, 4: 371–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E. and J. Pfeffer (1976) “Environments of Organizations,” Annual Review of Sociology, 2: 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alger, C. (2002) “The Emerging Roles of NGOs in the UN System: From Article 71 to a People’s Millennium Assembly,” Global Governance, 8: 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, A. (1983) “Methods of Multilateral Management: The Interrelationship of International Organizations and NGOs,” in T.T. Gati (ed.) The US, the UN and the Management of Global Change (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloed, A. (2007) “The OSCE’s Exclusion of NGOs: Back to the Old Days?” Helsinki Monitor 4 /2007: 315–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgomano-Loup, L. (2007) Improving NATO-NGO Relations in Crisis Response Operations (Rome: NATO Defense College).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2002) “Corporate Lobbying: The Logic of Access,” Journal of European Public Policy, 9: 365–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2003) “A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Corporate Lobbying in the European Parliament,” European Integration Online Papers, 7: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, R. (1994) “A New Role for NGOs in the CSCE,” in A. Bloed (ed.) The Challenges of Change: The Helsinki Summit of the CSCE and Its Aftermath (Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brühl, T. (2003) Nichtregierungsorganisationen als Akteure internationaler Umweltverhandlungen: Ein Erklärungsmodell auf der Basis der situationsspezifischen Ressourcennachfrage (Frankfurt/Main: Campus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brühl, T. (2007) “Public-private Partnerships: Unlike Partners? Assessing New Forms of Regulation,” in S.A. Schirm (ed.) Globalization: State of the Art and Perspectives (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, S. (1997) “Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 18: 183–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, K. (1996) “Greening the UN: Environmental Organisations and the UN System,” in L. Gordenker and T.G. Weiss (eds) NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Czempiel, E.-O. (1981) Internationale Politik: Ein Konfliktmodell (Paderborn: Schöningh).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K. (2007) “Nichtstaatliche Akteure und der Wandel der Governance-Norm,” paper presented at the workshop “Macht, Ohnmacht, Gegenmacht — Nichtstaatliche Akteure im globalen Regieren,” Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Delmenhorst, 15–16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donini, A. (1996) “The Bureaucracy and the Free Spirits: Stagnation and Innovation in the Relationship between the UN and NGOs,” in T.G. Weiss and L. Gordenker (eds) NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, P.-M. (1986) “Conclusions générales du colloqui,” in M. Bettati and P.-M. Dupuy (eds) Les O.N.G. et le droit international (Paris: Economia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feraru, A.T. (1974) “Transnational Political Interests and the Global Environment,” International Organization, 28: 31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaer, F.D. (1996) “Reality Check: Human Rights NGOs Confront Governments at the UN,” in T.G. Weiss and L. Gordenker (eds) NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2007) “Review Article: Organised Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the EU,” British Journal of Political Science, 37: 333–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.M. (1992) “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, 46: 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer and V. Rittberger (1997) Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, P.V. (2008) NATO’s Comprehensive Approach to Crisis Response Operations: A Work in Slow Progress (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M.E. and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissling, C. and J. Steffek (2006) “Civil Society Participation in International Governance: The UN and the WTO Compared,” University of Bremen, TranState Working Paper No. 42 /2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissling, C. and J. Steffek (2008) “CSOs and the Democratization of International Governance: Prospects and Problems,” in J. Steffek, C. Kissling and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. and B. Finke (2007) “The Institutional Shaping of EU-Society Relations: A Contribution to Democracy via Participation?” Journal of Civil Society, 3: 205–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S., and P. White (1961) “Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 5: 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2006) “Institutionalizing Societal Activism into Structures of Global Governance — Amnesty International and the United Nations System,” Journal of International Relations and Development, 9: 371–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, P. (2008) “Civil Society Participation in International Security Organizations: The Cases of NATO and OSCE,” in J. Steffek, C. Kissling and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphet, S. (1996) “NGOs and the Environment,” in P. Willetts (ed.) The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in the UN System (London: Hurst & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanz, P. and J. Steffek (2005) “Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation in International Governance: Criteria and Research Strategies,” Acta Politica, 40: 368–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omelicheva, M.Y. (2009) “Global Civil Society and Democratization of World Politics: A Bona Fide Relationship or Illusory Liaison?” International Studies Review, 11: 109–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, M.S. (2001) “Corporatism Goes Global,” Global Governance, 7: 265–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. (1997) “States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions,” International Studies Quarterly, 41: 719–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, K.D. (2006) “A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs,” International Studies Quarterly, 50: 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, M.P. and D. Tussie (2001) “Pressing Ahead with New Procedures for Old Machinery: Global Governance and Civil Society,” in V. Rittberger (ed.) Global Governance and the United Nations System (Tokyo: United Nations University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V. and M. Aim (1991) “Regime Theory: Findings from the Study of East-West Regimes,” Cooperation and Conflict, 26: 165–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2002) Civil Society Voices and the International Monetary Fund (Ottawa: North-South Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2004) Democratizing the Global Economy: The Role of Civil Society (Coventry: University of Warwick, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snidal, D. (1985) “Coordination vs. Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes,” American Political Science Review, 79: 923–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. (2008) “Explaining Cooperation between IGOs and NGOs: Push Factors, Pull Factors, and the Policy Cycle,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association (ISA), San Francisco, 26–29 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. and U. Ehling (2008) “Civil Society Participation at the Margins: The Case of WTO,” in J. Steffek, C. Kissling and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. and P. Nanz (2008) “Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance,” in J. Steffek, C. Kissling and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J., C. Kissling and P. Nanz (eds) (2008) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A.A. (1990) Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudyka, K.P. (2002) “Non-Governmental Organizations and the OSCE,” in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.) OSCE Yearbook 2001 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2003) “UN System and Civil Society: An Inventory and Analysis of Practices,” Secretary General, Panel of Eminent Persons on Civil Society and UN Relationships, May 2003. Available at http://www.ngocongo.org/files/un-civil_society-background_paperl.doc (accessed July 4, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.C. (1968) International Non-Governmental Organizations: Their Purposes, Methods and Accomplishments (New York: Greenwood Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (1996) “Consultative Status for NGOs at the United Nations,” in P. Willetts (ed.) The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in the UN System (London: Hurst & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (2000) “From ‘Consultative Arrangements’ to ’Partnership’: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN,” Global Governance, 6: 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, F. and J. Depledge (2004) The International Climate Change Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Jens Steffek

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steffek, J. (2010). Explaining Patterns of Transnational Participation: The Role of Policy Fields. In: Jönsson, C., Tallberg, J. (eds) Transnational Actors in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283220_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics