Skip to main content

Transnational Actor Participation in International Institutions: Where, Why, and with What Consequences?

  • Chapter

Abstract

The nature of global governance is changing, as are the standards by which we judge its legitimacy. While international institutions were long the exclusive preserve of national governments, the past decades have witnessed a gradual and partial shift from interstate cooperation to more complex forms of governance, involving participation by transnational actors, such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), advocacy networks, party associations, and multinational corporations. Increasingly, states and international institutions are engaging transnational actors as policy experts, service providers, compliance watchdogs and stakeholder representatives. The World Bank, for instance, draws on the expertise of NGOs in the formulation of country reports, engages in operational collaboration with civil society actors in the field, and conducts policy dialogue through the NGO-World Bank Committee. Whereas only 21 percent of all World Bank funded projects involved civil society participation in 1990, this figure had risen to 72 percent in 2006 (World Bank, 2009). The United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) provides another example, engaging transnational actors by offering NGOs accreditation to its meetings, operating a Global Civil Society Forum, and drawing on civil society in the implementation of its programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, K.W. and D. Snidal (2000) “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization, 54: 421–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. and A.I. Johnston (eds) (2007) Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K.J. (2006) “Private Litigants and the New International Courts,” Comparative Political Studies, 39: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K. (2002) Address at Ceremony of Adherence to the Global Compact, Madrid, 9 April. www.unglobalcompact.org/NewsAndEvents/speeches_and_statements/sg_adherence_to_gc.html (accessed April 5, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.N. and M. Finnemore (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M.M. and E. Corell (2008) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexell, M., J. Tallberg and A. Uhlin (2010) “Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors,” Global Governance, 16: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, S. (1997) “Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance,” Michigan journal of International Law, 18: 183–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, S. (2000) “Opening the WTO to Nongovernmental Interests,” Fordham International Law Journal, 24: 173–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerny, P.G. (1993) “Plurilateralism: Structural Differentiation and Functional Conflict in the Post-Cold War World Order,” Millennium, 22: 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1999) “Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View,” in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon (eds) Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998) “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, 52: 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. (2003) The Coming Democracy: New Rules for Running a New World (Washington DC: Island Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, N. (2008) “Reframing NGOs: The Identity of an International Relations Non-Starter,” European Journal of International Relations, 14: 231–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorescu, A. (2007) “Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations,” International Studies Quarterly, 51: 625–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992) “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, 46: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D.G., D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson and Mj. Tierney (eds) (2006) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. and M. Koenig-Achibugi (eds) (2005) Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. and A. McGrew (2002) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselin, D. and W. Wallace (eds) (2001) Non-State Actors in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (2005) “Defining Accountability Up: The Global Economic Multilaterals,” in D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M.E. and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. and J.S. Nye (2003) “Redefining Accountability for Global Governance,” in M. Kahler and D. Lake (eds) Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koremenos, B., C. Lipson and D. Snidal (2001) “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization, 55: 761–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. and M.D. McCubbins (2006) “The Logic of Delegation to International Organizations,” in D.G. Hawkins, D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson and M.J. Tierney (eds) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. (2004) A Democratic Audit of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1998) “Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards,” European Law Journal, 4, 1: 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malena, C. (2004) “Strategic Partnership: Challenges and Best Practices in the Management and Governance of Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships Involving UN and Civil Society Actors,” paper prepared for the Multi-Stakeholder Workshop on Partnerships and UN-Civil Society Relations, Pocantico, NY, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2005) “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis,” in D. Held and M. Koenig-Achibugi (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R., A.M. Goetz, J.A. Scholte and M. Williams (2000) Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patomäki, H. and T. Teivainen (2004) A Possible World: Democratic Transformation of Global Institutions (London and New York: Zed Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (2003) The Engines of Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, T. and M. Finger (1994) Environmental NGOs in World Politics: Linking the Local and the Global (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. (1997) “States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions,” International Studies Quarterly, 41: 719–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. (2004) “Police Patrols & Fire Alarms in the NAAEC,” Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 26: 389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, K.D. (2005) “Up to No Good? Recent Critics and Critiques of NGOs,” in H.F. Carey and O.P. Richmond (eds) Subcontracting Peace: The Challenges of NGO Peacebuilding (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, K.D. (2006) “A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms, and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs,” International Studies Quarterly, 50: 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2002) “Transnational Actors and World Politics,” in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T. (ed.) (1995) Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.T. and E.-O. Czempiel (eds) (1992) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, M.G. (ed.) (1999) Innovation in Multilateralism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2002) “Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance,” Global Governance, 8: 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. (2005) “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance,” in D. Held and M. Koenig-Achibugi (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. and P. Nanz (2008) “Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance,” in J. Steffek, C. Kissing and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J., C. Kissling, and P. Nanz (eds) (2008) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2002a) “Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union,” International Organization, 56: 609–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2002b) “Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?” West European Politics, 25: 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009) Natural Allies: Engaging Civil Society in UNEP’s Work (Nairobi: United Nations Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.A. (2004) Multilateral Conferences: Purposeful International Negotiation (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, P. (2007) “Civil Society,” in T.G. Weiss and S. Daws (eds) The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T.G. and L. Gordenker (eds) (1996) NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T.G., T. Carayannis and R. Jolly (2009) “The `Third’ United Nations,” Global Governance, 15: 123–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (ed.) (1996) “The Conscience of the World”: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in the U.N. System (Washington DC: Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (2000) “From ‘Consultative Arrangements’ to ‘Partnership’: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN,” Global Governance, 6: 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (2006) “The Cardoso Report on the UN and Civil Society: Functionalism, Global Corporatism, or Global Democracy?” Global Governance, 12: 305–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, G. (1999) “Polylateralism’ and New Modes of Global Dialogue,” Discussion Paper, No. 59. Leicester: Leicester Diplomatic Studies Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009) Civil Society — Background. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/CSO/0,contentMDK:20093161-menuPK: 220423-pagePK:220503-piPK:220476-theSitePK:228717,00.html (accessed November 11, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2009) NGOs Attendance to the WTO Sixth Ministerial Conference, Hong Kong, China, 13–18 December, 2005. http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min05_e/ngo_info_e.htm (accessed November 11, 2009)

  • Yearbook of International Organizations (Brussels: Union of International Associations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziirn, M. (2000) “Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions,” European Journal of International Relations, 6: 183–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Jonas Tallberg and Christer Jönsson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tallberg, J., Jönsson, C. (2010). Transnational Actor Participation in International Institutions: Where, Why, and with What Consequences?. In: Jönsson, C., Tallberg, J. (eds) Transnational Actors in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283220_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics