Skip to main content

The Dialectics of Democracy: Common-Particular and Public-Private

  • Chapter
Book cover The Role of Large Enterprises in Democracy and Society
  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

It is well known that classical Greek used three words to express what we now call people: láos, démos, ójlos. Ójlos meant a group of people whose only connection was physical proximity and a common rejection of something, or protest against someone; the Romans used the term plebs. Láos is an archaic term, meaning an organized human group with an internal connection, and an internal principle of unity. The Athenians, or the Jews, were láos. Démos is an intermediate kind of word. It indicates a population which is neither ójlos, the masses, nor has an internal principle of articulation, precisely because démos was a peaceful group of individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alvira, Rafael and Cruz, Alfredo (eds) (2003) ‘Participación: Entre filosofía y política’, Anuario Filosófico, 36 (1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvira, Rafael, Grimaldi, Nicolás and Herrero, Montserrat (eds) (2008) Sociedad civil: la democracia y su destino, (Pamplona: EUNSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, R. (1992) What’s the Matter with Liberalism? (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz Prados, Alfredo (2006) Ethos y polis: bases para una reconstrucción de la filosofía política (Pamplona: EUNSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will (1991) Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Possenti, Vittorio (1991) Le societá liberali al bivio: lineamenti di filosofia della societá (Genoa: Marietti).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1976) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael J. (1997) Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael J. (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1995) Negative Freheit?: zur Kritik des neuzeitlichen Individualismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigna, Carmelo (ed.) (2003) Libertà, giustizia e bene in una società plurale (Milan: Vita e Pensiero).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Rafael Alvira

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alvira, R. (2010). The Dialectics of Democracy: Common-Particular and Public-Private. In: Fryzel, B., Dembinski, P.H. (eds) The Role of Large Enterprises in Democracy and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283138_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics