Abstract
It is well known that classical Greek used three words to express what we now call people: láos, démos, ójlos. Ójlos meant a group of people whose only connection was physical proximity and a common rejection of something, or protest against someone; the Romans used the term plebs. Láos is an archaic term, meaning an organized human group with an internal connection, and an internal principle of unity. The Athenians, or the Jews, were láos. Démos is an intermediate kind of word. It indicates a population which is neither ójlos, the masses, nor has an internal principle of articulation, precisely because démos was a peaceful group of individuals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Alvira, Rafael and Cruz, Alfredo (eds) (2003) ‘Participación: Entre filosofía y política’, Anuario Filosófico, 36 (1–2).
Alvira, Rafael, Grimaldi, Nicolás and Herrero, Montserrat (eds) (2008) Sociedad civil: la democracia y su destino, (Pamplona: EUNSA).
Beiner, R. (1992) What’s the Matter with Liberalism? (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).
Cruz Prados, Alfredo (2006) Ethos y polis: bases para una reconstrucción de la filosofía política (Pamplona: EUNSA).
Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Kymlicka, Will (1991) Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Possenti, Vittorio (1991) Le societá liberali al bivio: lineamenti di filosofia della societá (Genoa: Marietti).
Rawls, John (1976) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Sandel, Michael J. (1997) Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Sandel, Michael J. (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press).
Taylor, Charles (1995) Negative Freheit?: zur Kritik des neuzeitlichen Individualismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Vigna, Carmelo (ed.) (2003) Libertà, giustizia e bene in una società plurale (Milan: Vita e Pensiero).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Rafael Alvira
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alvira, R. (2010). The Dialectics of Democracy: Common-Particular and Public-Private. In: Fryzel, B., Dembinski, P.H. (eds) The Role of Large Enterprises in Democracy and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283138_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283138_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31053-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28313-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)