Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

WJ-40: Issues in the Investigation of Implicature

  • Chapter
Book cover Meaning and Analysis

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition ((PSPLC))

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

Without actually employing the term ‘pragmatics’, Paul Grice laid out the map for modern pragmatic theory in his William James lectures of 1967 by setting out:

…a distinction…within the total signification of a remark…between what the speaker has said (in a certain favored and maybe in some degree artificial, sense of ‘said’), and what he has implicated (e.g., implied, indicated, suggested, etc.), taking into account the fact that what he has implicated may be either conventionally implicated (implicated by virtue of the meaning of some word or phrase which he has used) or non-conventionally implicated (in which case the specification of implicature falls outside the specification of the conventional meaning of the words used). (Grice 1989[1967]: 118)

A version of this paper appears as Horn (2009). Thanks are due to those who attended and commented on earlier presentations of parts of this material in Milan, East Lansing, Oakland, Rochester, Sheffield, and Leysin, and in particular to Barbara Abbott, Mira Ariel, Kent Bach, Emma Borg, David Braun, Bart Geurts, Michael Israel, Manfred Krifka, Anna Papafragou, Klaus Petrus, Jennifer Saul, and Gregory Ward. The blame is all mine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anscombre, J. C. and Ducrot, O. (1983) L’argumentation dans la langue (Brussels: Pierre Mardaga).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, M. (2004) Most. Language, 80: 658–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, M. (2006) A ‘just that’ lexical meaning for most. In K. Turner and K. von Heusinger (eds.)Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics (London: Elsevier), pp. 49–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962) How To Do Things With Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (1994) Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language, 9: 124–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (1999) The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 327–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (2001) You don’t say? Synthese, 127: 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (2005) Context ex machina. In Z. Szabó (ed.) Semantics vs. Pragmatics (Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 15–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (2006) The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In B. Birner and G. Ward (eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn (Amsterdam: Benjamins), pp. 21–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bédier, J. (1946) Le roman de Tristan et Iseut, renouvelé par Joseph Bédier de l’Academie Française (Paris: L’Édition de l’Art H. Piazza).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontly, T. (2005) Modified Occam’s Razor: Parsimony arguments and pragmatic explanations. Mind & Language, 20: 288–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E. (2004) Minimal Semantics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, B. (1911) Logic, Vol. 1, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, L. and Noveck, I. (2004) Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 437–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, R., Katsos, N. and Williams, J. (2006) Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100: 434–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultinck, B. (2005) Numerous Meanings: The Meaning of English Cardinals and the Legacy of Paul Grice (Oxford: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (2005) Insensitive Semantics (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-conditional semantics. In R. Kempson (ed.) Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 133–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (1995) Quantity maxims and generalized implicatures. Lingua, 96: 213–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2004) Relevance theory and the saying-implicating distinction. In Horn and Ward (eds.), pp. 633–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2005) Relevance theory, Grice, and the neo-Griceans: A response to Laurence Horn’s ‘Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics’. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2: 303–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. (2005) Paul Grice, Philosopher and Linguist. (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (2004) Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/ pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 39–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G., Crain, S. Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A. and Meroni, L. (2001) The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. BUCLD 25 Proceedings (Somerville: Cascadilla), pp. 157–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1972) Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In S. Peters (ed.) Goals of Linguistic Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall), pp. 63–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J. (1971) Some remarks on Grice’s views about the logical particles of natural language. In Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.) Pragmatics of Natural Language (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 50–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2007) Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and rationality. Journal of Pragmatics, 39: 2308–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Morgan, A. (1858) On the syllogism: III, and on logic in general. In De Morgan On the syllogism and other logical writings (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 74–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1975) Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6: 353–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1979) Comment contróler la vérité. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 25: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (2006) Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. Ms., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. (1979) Pragmatics (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. (1998) Scalars. In P. Ludewig and B. Geurts (eds.) Lexikalische Semantik aus kognitiver Sicht (Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag), pp. 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. (2009) Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. Mind and Language, 24: 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. To appear. Quantity Implicatures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. and Nouwen, R. (2007) At least et al.: The semantics of scalar modifiers. Language, 83: 533–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. (1998) Polarity Sensitivity as (Non -)Veridical Dependency (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1961) The causal theory of perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 35: 121–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1986) Reply to Richards. In R. Grandy and R. Warner (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 45–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzmann, D. (2007) Eine Implikatur konventioneller Art: Der Dativus Ethicus. Linguistische Berichte, 211: 277–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzmann, D. (2008) On the Interaction between Modal Particles and Sentence Mood in German (Mainz: German Institute, Johannes Gutenberg University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Sir W., of Edinburgh (1860) Lectures on Logic, Volume I. (Edinburgh: Blackwood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1984) A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness, NELS, 14: 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. (1985) A Theory of Scalar Implicature. University of Pennsylvania dissertation. (Revised version published New York: Garland, 1991.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. (1972) On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. UCLA dissertation. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1984) Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context (GURT ’84) (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), pp. 11–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1989) A Natural History of Negation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). (Reissued with a new introduction, Stanford: CSLI, 2001.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1990) Hamburgers and truth: Why Gricean inference is Gricean. BLS, 16: 454–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1992) The said and the unsaid. SALT II (Columbus: Ohio State University), pp. 163–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2000a) From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2000b) Pick a theory (not just any theory): Indiscriminatives and the free-choice indefinite. In L. Horn and Y. Kato (eds.) Negation and Polarity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2004) Implicature. In Horn and Ward (eds.), pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2006a) The border wars: A neo-Gricean perspective. In K. Turner and K. von Heusinger (eds.) Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics (Oxford: Elsevier), pp. 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2006b) More issues in neo- and post-Gricean pragmatics: a reply to Carston. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2007a) Neo-Gricean pragmatics: a Manichaean manifesto. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.) Pragmatics (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 158–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2007b) Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In I. Kecskes and L. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 39–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2008) “I love me some him”: The landscape of non-argument datives. In O. Bonami and P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.) Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 7, pp. 169–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (2009) WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning. International Review of Pragmatics, 1: 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (To appear) Histoire d’*O: Lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In J.-Y. Béziau (ed.) New Perspectives on the Square of Opposition (Bern: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) (2004) The Handbook of Pragmatics (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurewitz, F., Papafragou, A., Gleitman, L. and Gelman, R. (2006) Asymmetries in the acquisition of numbers and quantifiers. Language Learning and Development, 2: 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M. (1996) Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19: 619–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M. (to appear) Pragmatics, Polarity, and the Logic of Scales (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaszczolt, K. (2005) Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, N. and Landman, F. (1993) Any. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16: 353–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasher, A. (1982) Gricean inference revisited. Philosophica, 29: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. and Stanley, J. (2005) Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic context. In Z. Szabó (ed.) Semantics vs. Pragmatics (Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 111–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, J.-P. (1991) Scalar predicates and negation: Punctual semantics and interval interpretations. CLS, 27: 140–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korelitz, J. Hanff (2005) The White Rose (New York: Miramax Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1995) The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 25: 209–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. (1980) Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations (New York: Garland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U. (1998) Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Journal of Semantics, 6: 57–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-S. and Horn, L. (1994) Any as indefinite + even. Ms., Yale University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, A. (1974) Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linebarger, M. (1987) Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10: 325–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, A. (1994) Truthfulness, lies, and moral philosophers: What can we learn from Mill and Kant? The Tanner Lectures. Downloadable at http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/macintyre_1994.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1867) An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, 3rd edn (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. and Posada, A. (2003) Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85: 203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J. (2003) Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86: 253–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, A. and Schwarz, N. (2006) Most wanted. Language Acquisition, 13: 207–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C. (2005) The Logic of Conventional Implicatures (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2001) What is said. Synthese, 128: 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2004) Literal Meaning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. (2006) The acquisition of scalar implicatures. §5.3 of Interface Strategies — Optimal and Costly Computations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 2006. Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 23: 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U. (2004) Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 367–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2002a) Speaker meaning, what is said and what is implicated. Noús, 36: 228–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2002b) What is said and psychological reality: Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 347–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2006) Lying, misleading, and accidental falsehood: The role of what is said. Ms., University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenter, S. (1999) Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity (New York: Garland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, P. G. (1762) Extraits des Assertions dangereuses et pernicieuses en tous genres soutenues et enseignées par les soi-disans Jésuites. (Tome III: Parjure, Fausseté, Faux Témoignage.) Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (1982) How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 13: 483–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solan, L. and Tiersma, P. (2004) Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B. (2006) Aspects de la pragmatique des opérateurs logiques. PhD dissertation, Université de Paris VII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1952) Introduction to Logical Theory (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. (2001) Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus. Synthese, 128: 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, M. (2009) What use is ‘what is said’? In M. Kissine and P. de Brabanter (eds.) Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models (Amsterdam: Emerald), pp. 27–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Laurence R. Horn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bern, Switzerland

    Klaus Petrus

Copyright information

© 2010 Laurence R. Horn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horn, L.R. (2010). WJ-40: Issues in the Investigation of Implicature. In: Petrus, K. (eds) Meaning and Analysis. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230282117_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation