Skip to main content

The European Security Strategy Revisited

  • Chapter
Book cover The European Union as a Small Power

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

The EU security policy was a leap in the dark. It was constructed under an agreement that the EU should have such a policy, but not what it should be about. On 12 December 2003, the leaders of the European Union approved the first-ever European Security Strategy, the ESS, proclaiming an intention to ‘share in the responsibility for global security and in building a better world’.1 The ESS summons up the EU’s external dimension, in a manner that transcends the metaphorical ‘pillars’ intended to visualize the workings of the Union. It encapsulates foreign and security policy—from the development and neighbourhood policies of the European Commission, via the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), under the auspices of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to police and judicial cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Note

  1. Biscop, S. & Andersson, J. J. (2008). The EU and the European Security Strategy: Forging a Global Europe. Routledge Advances in European Politics, 49. London: Routledge, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Berenskoetter, F. S. (2005). Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European Security Strategies. Security Dialogue, 36 (1), 71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duke, S. (2008). The Future of EU-NATO Relations: A case of Mutual Irrelevance through Competition? Journal of European Integration, 30 (1), 27–43; Bailes, A. J. K. (2005). The European Security Strategy An Evolutionary History. SIPRI policy paper, no. 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toje, A. (2008c). The 2003 European Union Security Strategy—a Critical Appraisal, European Foreign Affairs Review, 9, (1), 2005, s. 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rieker, P. & Ulriksen, S. (2003). En Annerledes supermakt?: Sikkerhets-og fors-varspolitikken i EU. Oslo: NUPI.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Holden, P. (2009). In Search of Structural Power: EU Aid Policy as a Global Political Instrument. Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clausewitz, C. v (1976). On War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gideon Rose (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, World Politics, 51 (1), pp. 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weigley, R. F. (1973). The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barkawi, T. (1998). Strategy as a Vocation: Weber, Morgenthau and Modern Strategic Studies. Review of International Studies, 24 (2), 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laïdi, Z. (2008). Norms over Force: The Enigma of European Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Menon, A. (2009). Empowering Paradise? The ESDP at Ten. International Affairs, 85 (2), pp. 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasconcelos, A., Grevi, G., Helly, D., Keohane, D., Schmid, H. & Zaborowski, M. (2009). The European Security Strategy, 2003–2008: Building on Common Interests. Paris: Institute for Security Studies, European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaldor, M. (2007). Human Security: Reflections on Globalization and Intervention. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a critical appraisal of the efforts of applying Human Security see Paris, R. (2001). Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? International Security, 26, p. 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rees, W. (2008). Inside Out: the External Face of EU Internal Security Policy. Journal of European Integration, 30 (1), 102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Art, Robert J. (2006). Striking the Balance. International Security, 30 (3), pp. 177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Posen, Barry (2006). European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity? Security Studies, 15 (2): 149–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooks, S. G. & Wohlforth, W. C. (2005). Hard Times for Soft Balancing. International Security, 30 (1), pp. 72–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howorth, J. & Menon, A. (2009). Still not Pushing Back: Why the European Union is not Balancing against the United States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (5), pp. 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, the case studies in Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snyder, G. H. (1984). The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics, 36 (4), 461–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffmann, S. (1976). No Trumps, No Luck, No Will. In Chace, J. & Ravenal, E. C. (eds). Atlantis Lost: US-European Relations after the Cold War. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Dow, J. (1998). Arbitrage, Hedging, and Financial Innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 11 (4), pp. 739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability. Washington Quarterly, 29 (1), p. 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. See Art, R. J. (2004). Europe Hedges Its Security Bets,. In Paul, T. V., Wirtz, J. J. & Fortmann, M. (eds), Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Grevi, G. (2009). The interpolar world: A new scenario. Paris: Institute for Security Studies

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the World Polity. Essays on International Institutionalization. The New International Relations. London: Routledge, p. 106.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Tunsjø, Ø. (2009). Hvordan ‘hedge’ i internasjonal politikk? Internasjonal politikk, 67 (2), pp. 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Asle Toje

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toje, A. (2010). The European Security Strategy Revisited. In: The European Union as a Small Power. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281813_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics